ImaginaryNumber
Imaginary Member
I agree that it is a civil debate, but it's not even clear whether most of the debaters are even scientists, let alone climate scientists. The only person who seems to know what he is talking about is Douglas Nuttall, though I have no idea what his credentials are. And I don't see that a conclusion was reached that CO2 does not/can not cause climate warming.CO2 does not and cannot cause catastrophic climate warming if you tripled the concentration in the atmosphere and that has been shown scientifically many times.
Your basic premise failed, and all extrapolations are carried down with it.
Here is an excellent debate on civil terms.
Is there empirical evidence that CO2 is the primary cause of... https://www.researchgate.net/post/Is_there_empirical_evidence_that_CO2_is_the_primary_cause_of_global_warming
Here are most of the other debaters:
Michael Kowalik - Independent ["Independent" of what?]
Emmanuel V Murray - National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development
Emmanuel Uzohuo - Federal Polytechnic Nekede, Owerri, Nigeria
Zagir Ataev - Dagestan State Pedagogical University
Harasit Kumar Paul - Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University
Robert Gerard van de Ketterij - Ministry of Defense, Netherlands
If you think these "scientists" represent cutting edge scientific research in Climate Change, it is no wonder you are so confused.