Ummmm..... so I'm not going to get involved in the above posted.... er.... discussion; but I do want to clarify a few things.
First off, I was a little confused. The Spindrift 37, Spindrift 40 (also called the Crowther 40), and Design 226A which is 42 ft, are three different designs. I was under the impression that the Crowther 40 was just a stretched version of the Spindrift 37 and perhaps I am right about that, but in any case I have found separate drawing (not plans) for each. And then the Design 226A is 42 ft and quite a bit of an advancement in overall design aspects from the Spindrift, although easily recognizable Crowther lines.
That said... I won't be building in wood. I've built many small craft in wood and although I love it as a classic, strong, and beautiful material I won't do it in a performance Cat. In the US, certified ply for boat building is in most cases equally as expensive as sheets of PVC80 foam core. I have actually sourced Airex C70 and a PVC60 at a lower price than BS 1088. There are some serious import costs on wood to the US right now and I'm afraid it will only get worse. The PVC60 I have found is from a US manufacturer, and while it has lower compressive modulus than PVC 80 I am only exploring the possibility of using a thicker core (19mm vs 16mm) to make up the difference and have a stiffer structure via the thicker foam core.
I do greatly appreciate the compressive and sheer strength of end grain balsa, and I have sourced 4 x 8 sheets of it for about 20 to 25% less than other name-brand core foams. My problem with blasa is that it still yields a heavier core structure if you are not meticulous in your lay-up schedule, but primarily there is a negative stigma in the US to anything 'wood' in core materials. I know this is very unfair since it is not the result of the material properties but rather shoddy workmanship, but the average uneducated boat buyer in the US will run away from a balsa core Cat like it had the plague even if it was built by the same guys who construct America's Cup boats, LOL. I will building this Cat for myself for the long term, but I'd be stupid to not consider future re-sale value... and just like my former collection of motorcycles, you can never have just one!
So right now I am fiddling with a 4 x 8 CNC panel router. I have roughed out plans for a machine that will have a roughly 20 ft X axis and an 8 foot Y axis, only 4 to 6 inches is required on the Z but I'll probably get 12 to 14 on the Z to shape foam blanks. Anyway, that is why I am attracted to the Schionning Arrow Cats, the flat-panel construction method. I'm awaiting continued updates to Tony Grainger's new Raku Cats as well. The seem to be flat panel above the water-line but have rounded bilges. Whatever I decide to do, I will likely utilize my plans for a large flat panel CNC router. Luckily I have enough room in my home shop for this machine so I can manufacture and store my own 'kit'. When I get on to building I will be selling my home and moving out the country will land is a bit cheaper, LOL!
The Crowther designs intrigue me and I just thought it'd be worth looking into. I might build a 25 ft sport Cat just for shits and giggles but also to get my processes refined before I dive into the big Cat. I'm not really balking at the $10K cost for Schionning's plans, but realistically I think I could buy all the materials (epoxy, S Glass, and core foam) to do the 25ft sport cat before I invest in the larger plans. In the long run, I think I could build a Crowther design with an alloy rig for much less than I could build an Arrow or a Raku, but still be very happy with its sailing ability. Seriously guys, I like the idea of high performance but my goal is efficient passage-making and storm avoidance, not winning races (but that would be fun!). i.e. I don't yet have the skill of a seasoned multi-hull racer, the only multi-hull I've sailed is a Hobi-Cat.