Fire Arrow Foiler / MPX Foil System Testing and Development--Self-Righting
When I started this thread it was to develop a "high performance
self-righting trimaran". That is the reason for the dihedral and "curved pieces" that support the amas. That gets buoyancy quite high and coupled with masthead flotation makes it almost impossible to capsize the boat. I assumed pitchpole could be a serious problem but in the second video(I think) I was having trouble with an overly sensitive(and very powerful) rudder and when I tried to gybe the rudder force caused a wanabe pitchpole. The boat went so far over I was sure she was going all the way, but the buoyancy of the main hull bow saved the day-I think she went almost 45 degrees.
The project sort of got hijacked by the new foil system which I considered was of more immediate need in development. Now that we know the foil system works 100%, it is just in need of refining to reduce foil areas, where possible, and strong wind testing along with testing the reefable rig.
One problem is that in building the boat one of my personal priorities was to do an excellent finish which I got fairly close to but at the cost of extra weight.
The initial system was to make the boat self-righting for a singlehanded 175lb. sailor. The boat can be sailed in the same breeze singlehanded as it can with a crew because of the ability of the main foil to add RM when necessary. The key to making it self -righting was to add a 175lb bulb at the junction of the daggerboard and main foil or to add the bulb(for testing purposes only) just above that juncture by clamping the lead bulb in place.
On paper that works and would still allow the boat to foil-especially with the bulb at the mainfoil/daggerboard juncture. That amount of ballast works because of the high buoyancy in the curved pieces at the end of the dihedral cross arms. It would primarily be there to guarantee recovery from a pitchpole since the arrangement of the amas pretty much prevents capsize even w/o the ballast. With the ballast the boat would theoretically be immune to capsize or pitchpole in "normal*" foiling.
So this year we will push the limits and see what happens. As mentioned earlier the evaluation of her capsize/pitchpole recovery will be diminished by the extra weight-equivalent to 3 175lb people and 29lb of supplies.
But we'll see what happens. This is one of the things that can be accurately tested on a model so the results will be interesting. Unfortunately, I can't do the singlehanded test because of the weight.
NOTE: Here is a link to a thread I had forgotten about that pretty accurately describes the self-righting characteristics I want to achieve with the Fire Arrow:
http://www.boatdesign.net/forums/multihulls/ballast-self-righting-trimarans-43264.html
*there is always a set of conditions that can invert any boat but the range of conditions in which this boat would be self-righting is pretty wide.
This first picture is a screen shot from the video done by an SA guy in order to ridicule the boat after the second picture below. The actual measured angle of the picture is 40 degrees but I think it was a bit higher before it started to recover. If the boat had a "normal" skinny main hull it probably wouldn't have recovered: