To install this app on your iPhone:
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Research reveals shocking detail on how Australia's environmental scientists are being silenced https://theconversation.com/research-reveals-shocking-detail-on-how-australias-environmental-scientists-are-being-silenced-140026Ecologists and conservation experts in government, industry and universities are routinely constrained in communicating scientific evidence on threatened species, mining, logging and other threats to the environment, our new research has found.
Our study, just published, shows how important scientific information about environmental threats often does not reach the public or decision-makers, including government ministers.
In some cases, scientists self-censor information for fear of damaging their careers, losing funding or being misrepresented in the media. In others, senior managers or ministers’ officers prevented researchers from speaking truthfully on scientific matters.
This information blackout, termed “science suppression”, can hide environmentally damaging practices and policies from public scrutiny. The practice is detrimental to both nature and democracy.
Ditto.LIKE
Federal report warns of financial havoc from climate change https://www.sltrib.com/news/nation-world/2020/09/09/federal-report-warns/Perhaps most notable is that it is being published at all. The Trump administration has suppressed, altered or watered down government science around climate change as it pushes an aggressive agenda of environmental deregulation that it hopes will spur economic growth.
“This is the first time a government entity has looked at the impacts of climate change on financial markets in the U.S.,” said Robert Litterman, the chairman of the panel that produced the report and a founding partner of Kepos Capital, an investment firm based in New York. “Rather than saying, ‘What’s the science?’ this is saying, ‘What’s the financial risk?’”
“A world wracked by frequent and devastating shocks from climate change cannot sustain the fundamental conditions supporting our financial system,” concluded the report, “Managing Climate Risk in the Financial System,”
It also recommends that the Federal Reserve supports international coalitions that handle climate threats, and calls for the Labor Department to revoke a proposed rule that would block retirement investment managers from weighing out environmental risks in their recommendations. It also stresses the importance of a carbon pricing by taxing emissions or establishing a cap-and-trade system. However, the report is also written from a realist perspective, explicitly stating that Trump will most likely ignore these recommendations if he is reelected.
In calling for climate-driven coverage adjustments, the report’s authors likened the monetary threat of world warming to the risk posed by the coronavirus right this moment and by mortgage-backed securities that precipitated the monetary crash in 2008.
One essential distinction, they stated, is that within the case of local weather change, monetary volatility and loss are prone to be unfold out over time, as they hit totally different areas and markets. Insurance corporations might withdraw from California within the wake of devastating wildfires, and residential values might plummet on coastlines and in floodplains. In the Midwest, banks might restrict loans throughout or after prolonged droughts that drastically decrease crop yields. All of these issues might be exacerbated by local weather change, however they’re unlikely to hit abruptly.
How obvious does it have to be that AGW is happening? /
If AGW was true then the solution would be the many AGW believers would adapt their behaviour and stop using fossil fuels.It's the same way here in the US, the only way deniers can continue is by suppression and misrepresentation of information.
What would be wrong when the many AGW believers only go on walking holidays starting and finishing at home and do this barefoot and stop using fossil fuels ?How obvious does it have to be that AGW is happening? How obvious does it have to get that AGW denial is based on profit and greed, and not science, before people reject en masse the ignorance of the few AGW deniers? How obvious before people realize the corporate driven hoax of AGW denial?
Here's a good theme song for the agw nonsense.