Lots of unsupported statements there. Do you actually have any experience with modern high performance concrete mix design and curing, it are you yet another armchair "expert" whose most recent experience with concrete is the 1970s?
As someone whose read a lot of academic research from the last 25 years or so (i.e. early 90's) concrete design and testing, and implementation, I can tell you that almost nothing that you wrote above is true. You're just furthering misconceptions that, though oft repeated, are no less false and perhaps worse for a forum that purports to be focused on "design", are not backed by even the facile attempt at supporting evidence.
I dont need to have first hand experience, I just look around at the hordes of ferro boats rolling out of the yards. off drawing boards, taking shape in peoples garages. Its overwhelming. The problem you have it that there is theory and practice, and in practice concrete boat construction is simply not economical. The hull is only about 1/3 the cost of a build so do tell how much are you going to save on a ferro cement hull especially with high tech materials? A ferro hull is just that, mostly steel with a thin layer of plaster screeded into a tightly packed armature, moreover to do a top job you'll need skilled labour, a mould to build it over and facilities to steam cure or at least control the environment for a month. Even assuming you'll save 50% over cedar core its still nothing considering resale will whatever you can get for it and dont even ask about insurance. You can beat physics, ferro is heavy and does not come into its own until its in the 50 plus foot 20 ton range, even then why would anyone sink a fortune into a material with such a poor reputation. Ferro has a place, marina pontoons being prime example but for a modern yacht it has had its day.