Michael Vanek
Junior Member
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2021
- Posts
- 20
- Reaction score
- 6
- Location
- Ontario
To install this app on your iPhone:
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All things being equal,the centre of buoyancy is the optimum place as the trim of the boat won't change with varying fuel load.
About 1/3rd of the way from the stern, ....
All things being equal,the centre of buoyancy is the optimum place as the trim of the boat won't change with varying fuel load.
Also, there is a sure misalignment between a 15 gallon tank and a 115hp engine. Given no stringers at all; the engine size you are choosing gives me great pause.
At rest this is correct but the tank should be on or behind the center of lift at normal planing speed, as this is a planing hull. This is a little harder to determine
I think that the width of the splashwell is way to wide. A wave coming over the back will add a lot of water into the splashwell.
While our boats were wider at the chine and a bit longer, we would stick 70 gallons of fuel against the transom with the addition of a big block and pump that weighed in around 1000 pounds
and never had the issue of keeping the bow up. We have modified about a dozen boats with outboards that had fuel tanks in the front, ( I realize that you are not putting the tanks up front)
that caused the bow to drop at higher speeds.
The best way to get to a solution is to find a similar hull, (deadrise, chine width and length ) with the hp that you want at a dealership and put the tank at that location.
you think he can find that boat somewhere?
None of those boat brands would be devoid of longitudinals afaik. Not trying to pick a fight; just not sure what he has here is all.A quick google search will reveal many riveted boats with the length, beam and similar deadrise.
Lund being one, Alumacraft, I think perhaps Crestliner .
None of those boat brands would be devoid of longitudinals afaik. Not trying to pick a fight; just not sure what he has here is all.