I'm planning the build of a 25ft canal/lake cruiser (pic attached) and am trying to come up with the build sequence. It is a displacement hull and has 3 developed "planks" per side (7mm plywood) to be assembled in a stitch-n-glue manner with 3 molds, plus the transom to help define the shape. All frame shapes (8 frames in all) are predetermined, not templated from the skin shape after gluing as Gougeon Bro's describe.
So what are the pros and cons of building upside down vs right side up? Typically small stitch-n-glue boats are built upright, which allows for 'heavy' fillets in the concave chines. The heavy fillets allow for a good amount of rounding of the chines prior to glassing the exterior. However, a beam of 8.5 ft will make filleting and laying glass inside the hull a literal pain in the back. So, doing it upside-down over the frames, like a plywood over frame construction, is possible, but I don't know if that's easier.?
Anyway, what do you all think about the build sequence? What if I just fillet and glass the 2 planks along the keel first, upright, then I should be able to walk on that to make the rest of the glassing easier. But that also means a lot of secondary bonds and sanding... idk?
So what are the pros and cons of building upside down vs right side up? Typically small stitch-n-glue boats are built upright, which allows for 'heavy' fillets in the concave chines. The heavy fillets allow for a good amount of rounding of the chines prior to glassing the exterior. However, a beam of 8.5 ft will make filleting and laying glass inside the hull a literal pain in the back. So, doing it upside-down over the frames, like a plywood over frame construction, is possible, but I don't know if that's easier.?
Anyway, what do you all think about the build sequence? What if I just fillet and glass the 2 planks along the keel first, upright, then I should be able to walk on that to make the rest of the glassing easier. But that also means a lot of secondary bonds and sanding... idk?