Sailboat-shaped Powerboats?

Discussion in 'Boat Design' started by Mat-C, Jan 23, 2012.

  1. masalai
    Joined: Oct 2007
    Posts: 6,818
    Likes: 121, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 1882
    Location: cruising, Australia

    masalai masalai

    and I get 7.5 miles per gallon :eek:
     
  2. BPL
    Joined: Dec 2011
    Posts: 217
    Likes: 15, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 209
    Location: Home base USA

    BPL Senior Member

    7.5 miles to the gallon at what speed?
    That's good for the wallet.

    The 38 gets 2 miles to the gallon at 18 knots cruise speed.
     
  3. eyschulman
    Joined: Jul 2011
    Posts: 253
    Likes: 8, Points: 18, Legacy Rep: 77
    Location: seattle Wa USA

    eyschulman Senior Member

    Going back to the original post-A motor sailor fills the slot. It often has a full disp. hull somewhere between sail and power and still has a rig for sailing steadying and to help with economy. If you observe sail boats cruising in the summer in many locations they power or motor sail 90% of time. So while they qualify as sailboats what ever that means they function just fine as motor boats.
     
  4. masalai
    Joined: Oct 2007
    Posts: 6,818
    Likes: 121, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 1882
    Location: cruising, Australia

    masalai masalai

    Hi BPL,
    The answer is in post #10 - http://www.boatdesign.net/forums/boat-design/sailboat-shaped-powerboats-41441.html#post522583 - My boat is a Bob Oram 39C sailing cat without mast and sails and under power alone does 10.1 knots on both engines but I cruise on one engine and using the autopilot as that steers better... On one engine at 3000rpm at the engine http://www.boatdesign.net/forums/boat-building/my-little-piece-peace-25962-121.html#post499727 has data on the most recent brief run to assess performance...

    6.7 knots at 3000 burning 3 Litres/hour... = 8.45nm/gal - - - on 2 engines at 3000rpm, same fuel burn (6litres/hour) and 10.1knots = 6.37nm/gal - - - - I made a mistake calculating conversions... I think this is correct now...

    I learnt to "think outside the box", and realise that, though mono-hulls have a certain BEAUTY, - - practicality demands certain compromises, and the wallet also forces other considerations, and a 40 ft x 21.5ft CAT is the best compromise I could imagine and the Bob Oram design met most NECESSARY criteria...

    I still have the opportunity to put a mast (12m stick - where the radar stands), and rig for a genoa to each bow, giving up to 90 sq metres (968 sq ft) of sail to carry in most slightly downwind and broad reach situations... The chain-plates, deck reinforcing are all in place to effect the rig... Displacement varies between 4,500kg and almost 6,000kg depending on fuel and 'cargo'...
     
  5. eyschulman
    Joined: Jul 2011
    Posts: 253
    Likes: 8, Points: 18, Legacy Rep: 77
    Location: seattle Wa USA

    eyschulman Senior Member

    I have no argument with the ultimate preformance edge of the multihull power or sail over the mono. I believe the key issues for those considering both are related to loading and how much time one spends at docks. I have lived with both formats and there are definete trade offs. It all comes down to how you use your boat. A fat cat kept light and on the hook makes for an attractive package. A fat cat overloaded and in need of hard to find dock space can be a pain in the butt.
     
  6. quequen
    Joined: Jul 2009
    Posts: 370
    Likes: 15, Points: 28, Legacy Rep: 199
    Location: argentina

    quequen Senior Member

  7. taniwha
    Joined: Sep 2003
    Posts: 205
    Likes: 10, Points: 18, Legacy Rep: 150
    Location: Pattaya, Thailand

    taniwha Senior Member

    I see your point Tad but of course we should not generalize some people do have good taste, they are just struggling with the 4 million :D
    Peter
    www.passagemaker.co.za
    [​IMG]
    https://picasaweb.google.com/105852014649751428903/Ataraxia#5056550756183331586
     
  8. Mat-C
    Joined: May 2007
    Posts: 255
    Likes: 12, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 141
    Location: Australia

    Mat-C Senior Member

    Thanks all...
    I don't really see the Pichiotti as being anything other than a displacement monohull that was designed by a sailboat designer... similar to the Dashew boats. Sure they have a passing resemblance to a sailboat hull, with finer fwd sections than you might otherwise find...

    Besides they operate at lower speeds than I was thinking of. Irens LDL boats are closer to the mark....
     
  9. BPL
    Joined: Dec 2011
    Posts: 217
    Likes: 15, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 209
    Location: Home base USA

    BPL Senior Member

    First I have seen Nigel Irens' LDL hulls. Thanks for the link Michael.
     
  10. Willallison
    Joined: Oct 2001
    Posts: 3,590
    Likes: 130, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 2369
    Location: Australia

    Willallison Senior Member

    Mat - Daiquiri and Tad have both given what I would consider to be the predominant reasons....
    The sailboat hull is compromised by the fact that it has an unfortunate habit of leaning over, so it's shape is dictated to some extent by this. Faster, more modern yots are held more upright than their predecessors ever were, which is why they do (to some extent) more closely resemble some mid-speed powerboats.
    But, as Tad pointed out, few powerboats are designed or built without taking interior volume into consideration. Would they be more 'sailboat-like' if it wasn't? To some extent yes, as the designs of Irens and others demonstrate.
     
  11. quequen
    Joined: Jul 2009
    Posts: 370
    Likes: 15, Points: 28, Legacy Rep: 199
    Location: argentina

    quequen Senior Member

    About "Exuma", it has a sailboat-like underwater body, optimized for low Fn. It seems like Briand has a registered patent on this issue, I should search for it. I think no other reason to shape a powerboat as a sailboat but low speed regime and low fuel consumption.
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Jan 26, 2012
  12. rwatson
    Joined: Aug 2007
    Posts: 6,166
    Likes: 495, Points: 83, Legacy Rep: 1749
    Location: Tasmania,Australia

    rwatson Senior Member


    Pretty good reasons, a couple more.

    To be able to Sail when your engine breaks downs

    To be able to Motor when the winds are gone, or way too adverse.

    The standard marketing talk at http://www.macgregor26.com/

    and I will have to start spruiking the same thing soon as I try to flog another version of the 'hybrid' motor-sailer
    http://schoolroad.weebly.com/project-2.html
     
  13. Tad
    Joined: Mar 2002
    Posts: 2,321
    Likes: 214, Points: 73, Legacy Rep: 2281
    Location: Flattop Islands

    Tad Boat Designer

    Exuma is an admirable design but I see nothing that I would consider Patentable or unique. She is a narrow and lightly loaded displacement hull, that's all......I believe Briand has trademarked the name BOS (Briand Optimized Stretched Hull).

    Length is 164' and beam 31.15', so B/L = .19
    LWL = 160' and cruising speed is 12 knots while top speed is 17. So S/L at cruising is 0.95 and at top speed is 1.34 (So called displacement hull speed).
    D/L = 97.6 at full load (400 tons)

    The equivalent 50' will have a beam of 9.5', displacement of 27,300 lbs at full load, cruising speed of 7 knots and full speed of 9.5 knots.
     
  14. Willallison
    Joined: Oct 2001
    Posts: 3,590
    Likes: 130, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 2369
    Location: Australia

    Willallison Senior Member

    Indeed... though we can no doubt all think of examples of where patents have been granted where perhaps they ought not to have been...
    Exuma is one of my favourite's of the current crop of superyachts... perhaps because Briand has followed the very same fundamentals that I have in the design of a similar sized motoryacht that I've been working on for some time, which shares very similar stats...

    http://www.charterworld.com/news/47...acht-tender-cway-pty-imaginocean-yacht-design

    Perhaps I ought to trademark an acronym of my own... WOSH perhaps (Will's Optimised Stretched Hull) or maybe SQUISH (Super QUiet Stretch Hull)..;)
     

    Attached Files:

    • T2.JPG
      T2.JPG
      File size:
      58.3 KB
      Views:
      1,052

  15. Tad
    Joined: Mar 2002
    Posts: 2,321
    Likes: 214, Points: 73, Legacy Rep: 2281
    Location: Flattop Islands

    Tad Boat Designer

    Will.......yes, get those catchy phrases trademarked right away before they're all taken.....

    I would note that Exuma's owner's accepted minimal accommodation for the ship's length.......Nice to see that Will was able to resist the 4th and 5th decks on his 47m....
     
Loading...
Forum posts represent the experience, opinion, and view of individual users. Boat Design Net does not necessarily endorse nor share the view of each individual post.
When making potentially dangerous or financial decisions, always employ and consult appropriate professionals. Your circumstances or experience may be different.