What Do We Think About Climate Change

That's just ranting and nothing else, as you use to do. Not useful at all, I'm afraid.

 

Actually, it's spot-on--especially in your case; you're the worst offender. You waste our time cutting and pasting crap that variously says,

(1) global warming isn't happening.

(2) the global warming that's happening isn't our fault.

(3) global warming is a good thing.

I repeat: which is it? Make up your friggen mind.

 

Why don't you post also the globalcombined sea ice extent graph? You are just trying to create a cloud of smoke to hide your great frustration on the fact that what is happening with Poles' ice is not fullfilling your warmist camp expectancies. Global amount of Polar ice is remaining quite stable through these last decades in spite of the increasing CO2 levels. Arctic ice extension and density is bouncing back from 2007 and you cannot at all explain that with the warmists CO2 warming theory.

And I note you have avoided to comment about the descending Arctic ice trend in the recent long term (from 1850, let's say, to have a criscrossing reference with HC3 data), as I have posted a few posts back.

 

This your post only confirm the perfect idiot you are, let me say you.
I do not deny global warming (although with some doubts about its real meaning) and of course global warming has proved to be an useful thing to humankind.

The only crap and friggen mind here is yours, who only post rants and rants and scornings like this in your last post once and again, without bringing anykind of useful information to this thread.

I'm sorry to repeat: I consider you another perfect and brainless idiot unable to keep an useful and enrichening debate on this matter.

 

masrapido,
está nítidamente claro, desde hace mucho tiempo, que no sabes escribir correctamente en español, así que no te ofendas tanto si te lo echan en cara.
Salud y cuidate.

 

And yes, guys, I'm also an idiot, because I'm arguing here with idiots, with some occasional exceptions like Alan's, who has lately "dissapeared" to my frustration.

 

"dissapeared"....much like the Clobal Warming fans.....or was it Global Cooling....woops, sorry, we now have Climate Change...can't possibly go wrong with that one eh......now , how can we increase taxes......emmmmmm....i know, lets have a carbon tax.......(wish we could tax fresh air)......

 

I'm still waiting for a clever response to my posts 8676 and 8655.

 

Clever!

 

Very clever!

 

are you nuts

thats what I just posted
you don't really read what other people post on this thing do you
small wonder you are so confused G
as Troy pointed out sometimes you even post information that directly supports the theory and act as if it doesn't even though it says so right there in the paper

the Arctic graph specifically shows the following dramatic downward trend



which comes with the caption

or we could talk about average ice thickness



caption reads

basically they are saying that although there are osculations in the system our adding millions of tons of CO2 to the picture is bound to have something to do with the dramatic loss in ice extent globally

 

Interesting reply. Usually if you write comments in a different language from the one used on the forum, you are expected to sort of know what your are typing. If you make 10 mistakes in two lines, you are bound to attract some comments. I gave you some hints as to how to type special letters and accents. I hoped you would thank me for it. Next time just send me a PM with your spanish, italian or german comments and I will proofread it for you at no charge, well within reason.

 

Troy, in general talk you are probably right. I love coffe, but if I drink 20 cappuchino in one day, I will probably regret it.

The story of CO2 is far removed from my example of coffee and your example of manure for one very simple reason. Concentrations. I wouldn't argue with you if yu told me we are going to replace 50% of athmosphere with CO2. Instead We are talking modest increases of a TRACE gas that has been 20 times, that is 2000% higher in the past with no deleterious consequences for life nor for temperatures.
Please read the following simple post:

 

How to create a crisis

 

In the past tides were hundreds of feet high, the day was much much shorter and geologic forces were the main effector of climate, volcanoes, continental drift disrupting ocean currents.

98% of all life forms that ever existed are now extinct.

Do we want to join them?

Nature will always balance the equation and maybe not in our favor.