Squidly-Diddly
Senior Member
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2007
- Messages
- 2,019
- Reaction score
- 190
- Location
- SF bay

Inspired by this interesting Italian ship with a Wave Piercing bow TOPPED by conventional spray defecting and nose dive arresting bow.
Saw Bow theory is you'd get most of the benefits of Wave Piercing, throughout the range of bow going into wave, but also most of the benefits of a final spray defecting upper bow. Theory is also that spray and bow wave generated by teeth would be proportional to the (not as big at conventional flared bow) tooth above ability to mitigate. In top flared bow example, could also reduce loading spikes a typical flared bow generates when hitting a wave, and reduce popping up and thus reduce porpoising.
My crude drawing tries to show how the indents would recess into the hull. Figure they would be smoothed and hydro-streamlined there the light pencil lines on are the field of the hulls. Size of teeth, number of teeth, angles, etc are all just my first best guess. Figure things would need to be adjusted to finer entry from the drawing's red indicator lines.
Would this work without creating prohibitive new drag? Would it work at all? Would it work but only create lots of drag in certain rough conditions where its working would be worth it?
Could it become the latest craze in boat design, like putting a row of six big outboards on your status symbol powerboat? "Mr Customer, just like lumber mills don't use axes but instead use SAWS, this new bow SAWS the waves in more manageable smaller pieces".
Which one of the 4 examples makes most and least sense?
Last edited: