It's a well written document and I found it quite easy to understand ... It also lists many typical material properties in the appendix so you can play around with different materials in your sandwich using realistic numbers...
http://www.hexcel.com/Resources/Dat...eets/Honeycomb_Sandwich_Design_Technology.pdf
What I find hard to believe is the formula for core shear. Shouldn't the modulus of elasticity of the skins, and skin thickness, be in the formula?
To me it "feels like" a sandwich with thin elastic skins should have greater shear stresses in the core, compared to one with thick stiff skins, with the same load.
While writing this post, I found this text, which has the math behind the simplification of the shear stress formula. And it was a bit of an eureka moment for me =)
http://www3.eng.cam.ac.uk/DesignOff...2002/1b/paper8/mmm/notesC/1B2001P8MMML08F.pdf
The simplified formula assumes Eskin >> Ecore
But I must admit that the feeling of a more elastic skin will cause more shear, still remains...
Example
One core is skinned with 300g/m2 glass + epoxy, and another skinned with 600g/m2 + epoxy. Both beams are on a 1m wide support, with me standing in the middle. The lighter beam will flex 40mm, and the other 20mm. According to the formula "shear stress = shear force divided by width and thickness", both cores will have the same shear stress. But to me it feels like the one which bends 40mm will have twice the shear stress.