Reduction in Military Reduces Navy Size

Discussion in 'All Things Boats & Boating' started by hoytedow, Jan 5, 2012.

  1. viking north
    Joined: Dec 2010
    Posts: 1,868
    Likes: 94, Points: 48, Legacy Rep: 1146
    Location: Newfoundland & Nova Scotia

    viking north VINLAND

    Yo Barnacle-- notice how i broke that up-- Holidays?? the world keeps on turning and work keeps on churning,(did take a short break it was pleasurable :) ) Getting ready for the trip-- started overhauling the rig yesterday, not so pleasurable :(
     
  2. Yobarnacle
    Joined: Nov 2011
    Posts: 1,746
    Likes: 130, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 851
    Location: Mexico, Florida

    Yobarnacle Senior Member holding true course

    What sanitary facilities do you have in your "rig"? Holding tank? Cassette?
     
  3. Leo Lazauskas
    Joined: Jan 2002
    Posts: 2,696
    Likes: 155, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 2229
    Location: Adelaide, South Australia

    Leo Lazauskas Senior Member

    Is that one hand praying for Obama to lose?
    Very Zen!
     
  4. Yobarnacle
    Joined: Nov 2011
    Posts: 1,746
    Likes: 130, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 851
    Location: Mexico, Florida

    Yobarnacle Senior Member holding true course

    Actually, it's the story about the privates wondering why all the officers was college grads and the grunts weren't even all high school grads. One volunteered to ask Lt. Lt put his hand in front of a shaggy barked tree and invited the soldier to hit it. He pulled away his hand in time for the private to bark his knuckles on the tree. Private got the lesson and returned to foxhole. His buddy asked what Lt said. "Here let me show you", said the private holding his hand in front of his face.
     
  5. troy2000
    Joined: Nov 2009
    Posts: 1,738
    Likes: 170, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 2078
    Location: California

    troy2000 Senior Member

    I honestly believe the Iraq war was the worst foreign policy blunder in the history of this country -- and it's going up against some stiff competition.

    While I didn't have any facts and figure at my fingertips, that was the point I was trying to make earlier when I mentioned air freight vs. cargo ships. As much as they awe me with what they can do these days, airplanes simply can't compete with ships when it comes to tonnage and firepower. You aren't realistically going to carry out a saturation bombing campaign with bombers shuttling between the US and the Middle East.

    And to be profitable, precision air raids need concentrated, high-value targets. With all the air power we had in the Vietnam War, we had no real answer for North Vietnam when it issued soldiers a rifle, a pair of sandals and a 50-kilo sack of rice apiece, pointed them south, and told them to start walking.

     
  6. Leo Lazauskas
    Joined: Jan 2002
    Posts: 2,696
    Likes: 155, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 2229
    Location: Adelaide, South Australia

    Leo Lazauskas Senior Member

    There's time to surpass that.
    During the latest debate in NH, some candidates seem to want to go back to
    Iraq, keep going in Afghanistan, attack Iran, and declare a trade war against China.

    A while ago I saw some calculations explaining why it took so long to start
    the Iraq campaign. Basically, even if all FedEx planes were commandeered,
    they still wouldn't be able to move the materiel needed fast enough.

    My interest is in other "high-value" targets, such as the victims of the Aceh
    tsunami. Essentially, it's all just a logistic problem, whether the targets are
    military or humanitarian.The US "100 knot Navy" challenge is interesting from
    both aspects.
     
  7. Mr Efficiency
    Joined: Oct 2010
    Posts: 10,386
    Likes: 1,045, Points: 113, Legacy Rep: 702
    Location: Australia

    Mr Efficiency Senior Member

    As long as no-one is left craving a navel, er, naval engagement, all is well. :D
     
  8. Yobarnacle
    Joined: Nov 2011
    Posts: 1,746
    Likes: 130, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 851
    Location: Mexico, Florida

    Yobarnacle Senior Member holding true course

    The problem isn't the navy. The navy isn't in the cargo business. It's lack of a sufficient size or number of bottoms in merchant fleet. At the end of WWII, the US had the largest merchant marine in the world. Pres Eisenhour decided american flag ships weren't a good idea, in case of oil spills. Yes, that was a concern even in 1952. Forein flags if they spilled, the govt could exact compensation. The US merchant marine been getting smaller every since.

    http://shipbuildinghistory.com/today/statistics/wldflt.htm

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Merchant_Marine

    An army may travel on it's stomach. My suggestion is a nations economy floats on it's bottoms. Even in the modern world!

    The merchant fleet is ignored untill war time, then "Where are our ships?"
     

    Attached Files:

    1 person likes this.
  9. hoytedow
    Joined: Sep 2009
    Posts: 5,857
    Likes: 400, Points: 93, Legacy Rep: 2489
    Location: Control Group

    hoytedow Carbon Based Life Form

    This is:
     

    Attached Files:

    • zen.jpg
      zen.jpg
      File size:
      20.9 KB
      Views:
      303
  10. michael pierzga
    Joined: Dec 2008
    Posts: 4,862
    Likes: 116, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 1180
    Location: spain

    michael pierzga Senior Member


    The American merchant fleet is non existent thanks to the Jones Act and American Seamen's propensity to sue when they stub their toe.
     
  11. Yobarnacle
    Joined: Nov 2011
    Posts: 1,746
    Likes: 130, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 851
    Location: Mexico, Florida

    Yobarnacle Senior Member holding true course

    Well, I've been american merchant marine for 40 years? Captain more than 30 years. Ocean going ships, tugs, oilfield boats, western rivers boats, great lakes ships, even a mississippi paddlewheeler.
    I've never met anyone who sued. Heard about it, but never met anybody.
    You make it sound like all american seamen are crybabies. Untrue and unjust.
     
  12. troy2000
    Joined: Nov 2009
    Posts: 1,738
    Likes: 170, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 2078
    Location: California

    troy2000 Senior Member



    The Jones Act requires that all goods transported by water between U.S. ports be carried in U.S.-flag ships, constructed in the United States, owned by U.S. citizens, and crewed by U.S. citizens and U.S. permanent residents. The purpose of the law is to support the U.S. maritime industry.

    Please explain how that has killed the American merchant fleet.
     
  13. michael pierzga
    Joined: Dec 2008
    Posts: 4,862
    Likes: 116, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 1180
    Location: spain

    michael pierzga Senior Member

    It killed it...there are no American ships. And the legal problems are so prominent that my insurance prohibits me from hiring American seaman.. Health care is triple cost.

    The Jones act is protectionism gone wild.
     
  14. michael pierzga
    Joined: Dec 2008
    Posts: 4,862
    Likes: 116, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 1180
    Location: spain

    michael pierzga Senior Member

    American ships must be built, serviced and staffed by americans.
     

  15. michael pierzga
    Joined: Dec 2008
    Posts: 4,862
    Likes: 116, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 1180
    Location: spain

    michael pierzga Senior Member

Forum posts represent the experience, opinion, and view of individual users. Boat Design Net does not necessarily endorse nor share the view of each individual post.
When making potentially dangerous or financial decisions, always employ and consult appropriate professionals. Your circumstances or experience may be different.