planing hull / air prop

Discussion in 'Boat Design' started by david carey, Sep 19, 2004.

  1. david carey
    Joined: Jan 2004
    Posts: 4
    Likes: 0, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 10
    Location: uk

    david carey New Member

    is it feasible to use hovercraft type powertrain on a planing hull . Would there be problems with heeling/turning . The areas I am thinking of using the boat are lagoons where sometimes the depth is only 1-2 ft . I know this because my sailing canoe has a 2 ft centreboard .
     
  2. jehardiman
    Joined: Aug 2004
    Posts: 3,776
    Likes: 1,171, Points: 113, Legacy Rep: 2040
    Location: Port Orchard, Washington, USA

    jehardiman Senior Member

  3. FAST FRED
    Joined: Oct 2002
    Posts: 4,519
    Likes: 111, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 1009
    Location: Conn in summers , Ortona FL in winter , with big d

    FAST FRED Senior Member

    The big hassle is THRUST .

    An air prop will convert 1 hp into about 5 lbs of push (7 with theoretically Perfect prop)

    A water prop will easily produce 20 lbs of push for each HP , with 25 or 27 not unheard of.

    So are you willing to have and feed an engine 4 or 5 times larger than a wet prop would need?

    FAST FRED
     
  4. John Perry
    Joined: Nov 2003
    Posts: 308
    Likes: 53, Points: 28, Legacy Rep: 129
    Location: South West UK

    John Perry Senior Member

    Depends on the diameter. A water prop provides a lot more thrust for a given power than the same sized air prop but if the air prop is large enough it could be as good, perhaps even better because it is not affected by cavitation/ventilation. The 'de-cavitator' project, fastest ever human powered boat used a large air prop because they reckoned it would be more efficient overall, interesting one of the main factors here was the elimination of water drag on the prop shaft, presumably the air drag for the air prop support tower was less than that for the water prop propeller shaft. The practical points are that for a given thrust and reasonable efficiency the water prop will be much smaller, hence cheaper and lighter and less generally intrusive, less noisy and probably safer for passengers if not for swimmers. Air prop maybe worth considering for very shallow draft, very high speed, or special requirements like the 'de-cavitator' boat. Or for flying boats of course.
    John
     
  5. david carey
    Joined: Jan 2004
    Posts: 4
    Likes: 0, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 10
    Location: uk

    david carey New Member

    thanks for the replies . I am aware of airboats but what i was picturing in my head was a conventional deep/medium vee speedboat hull with a inboard engine mounted low in the hull driving one or two airprops , therefore having nothing to damage below the waterline and capable of going from lagoon to river and then to sea .
     

  6. Corpus Skipper
    Joined: Oct 2003
    Posts: 606
    Likes: 8, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 173
    Location: Corpus Christi TX

    Corpus Skipper Hopeless Boataholic

Loading...
Forum posts represent the experience, opinion, and view of individual users. Boat Design Net does not necessarily endorse nor share the view of each individual post.
When making potentially dangerous or financial decisions, always employ and consult appropriate professionals. Your circumstances or experience may be different.