comfisherman
Senior Member
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2009
- Messages
- 1,031
- Reaction score
- 566
- Location
- Alaska
I have a di13 scania, purchased as it was the only wet turbo engine with a good degree of modularity in the space at the time. The john deere in equivalent size had less units in circulation and less auxiliary ports. Cat had dropped the c12 and had not yet released the new c12 that is a fpt? Based motor.
I dont like the Cummins engines between the 8.3 and the 19 liter. The qsm11 and new 15 liter still rely on dry turbos and years of dealing with long term use of dry turbos has me not like them so much. Especially in a higher load application. 22m and 45,000kg at 12 knots is going to be loading a 12 liter main, and taxing the smaller class mains.
Cat still makes legacy engines for export markets, not sure if Russia is considered that or not. But a 3406 while not as modern or fuel efficient is a heck of a motor.
Scania has treated me well, parts are about cat priced, not as good as cummins but serviceable. Definitely some sticker shock as to new price.
As to the Chinese Cummins, I've seen 2x 5.9 and 2x8.3 Chinese Cummins in service. The 5.9s seemed like decent copies, the 8.3s had bad castings and didn't allow for easy replacement of pumps, seemed like parts were not as interchangeable.
Curios as to the design requirements for 12 knkts. I know of one similar sized catamaran that had 12.5 liter luggers and did 11 with a 16knot top end.
I dont like the Cummins engines between the 8.3 and the 19 liter. The qsm11 and new 15 liter still rely on dry turbos and years of dealing with long term use of dry turbos has me not like them so much. Especially in a higher load application. 22m and 45,000kg at 12 knots is going to be loading a 12 liter main, and taxing the smaller class mains.
Cat still makes legacy engines for export markets, not sure if Russia is considered that or not. But a 3406 while not as modern or fuel efficient is a heck of a motor.
Scania has treated me well, parts are about cat priced, not as good as cummins but serviceable. Definitely some sticker shock as to new price.
As to the Chinese Cummins, I've seen 2x 5.9 and 2x8.3 Chinese Cummins in service. The 5.9s seemed like decent copies, the 8.3s had bad castings and didn't allow for easy replacement of pumps, seemed like parts were not as interchangeable.
Curios as to the design requirements for 12 knkts. I know of one similar sized catamaran that had 12.5 liter luggers and did 11 with a 16knot top end.