Moonpool

Discussion in 'Hydrodynamics and Aerodynamics' started by dalebirrell, May 25, 2012.

  1. dalebirrell
    Joined: Nov 2009
    Posts: 25
    Likes: 1, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 32
    Location: Strathclyde Uni

    dalebirrell Junior Member

    How would a moonpool dampen the motion of the vessel/structure it was on?
     
  2. Submarine Tom

    Submarine Tom Previous Member

    Negatively.
     
  3. JRMacGregor
    Joined: Oct 2005
    Posts: 83
    Likes: 16, Points: 8, Legacy Rep: 255
    Location: Scotland, UK

    JRMacGregor Junior Member

    Assuming we are talking about the motions of the vessel at rest............

    .............and assuming we are talking primarily about heave and pitch.....

    The presence of the moonpool will reduce the waterplane area of the vessel. Normally this will tend to increase the natural period of heave of the vessel, which is normally a good thing - and is a special advantage if it can be moved beyond the period of the most commonly occuring sea states in the area of operation.

    Depending on the structures/baffles placed inside the moonpool you might get a slight increase in resistance (drag) to vertical motion (which is a form of heave damping, similar to the way a bilge keel provides roll damping) but not enough to make a real difference to the peak amplitudes of heave motion.

    If you have more than one moonpool spread out along the length of the vessel, you can have a more marked effect on pitch motion. Not only does the pitch (as well as heave) natural period of motion become altered, but the wave induced pitch excitation moment can also be made lower in waves of the length (hopefully) which will most often be encountered.

    Due the greater lever arm, moonpools near the ends of the ship can contribute to pitch damping, but as with heave (but unlike roll) it is difficult to much affect the peak amplitudes of pitch motion by damping.

    The more moonpools you have in your monohull, the closer it becomes (in simplistic terms) to a semisubmersible (which, as you know, are optimised for low motions).

    This is the philosophy behind the successful design of the three moonpool monohull drillship NAVIS EXPLORER (built around 1999) but now called BELFORD DOLPHIN.
     
  4. mydauphin
    Joined: Apr 2007
    Posts: 2,166
    Likes: 52, Points: 48, Legacy Rep: 575
    Location: Florida

    mydauphin Senior Member

    IF they are too big the ship might sink...
     
  5. CWTeebs
    Joined: Apr 2011
    Posts: 232
    Likes: 15, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 171
    Location: Maine

    CWTeebs AnomalyGenerator

    I've also found that, depending on the size of the moonpool, the added mass increases which can significantly dampen roll motions (my last project was an OSV with a moon pool).

    CWTeebs
     

  6. dalebirrell
    Joined: Nov 2009
    Posts: 25
    Likes: 1, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 32
    Location: Strathclyde Uni

    dalebirrell Junior Member

    Nice one, thanks
     
Forum posts represent the experience, opinion, and view of individual users. Boat Design Net does not necessarily endorse nor share the view of each individual post.
When making potentially dangerous or financial decisions, always employ and consult appropriate professionals. Your circumstances or experience may be different.