Last voyage for Costa Concordia cruise ship

Discussion in 'All Things Boats & Boating' started by daiquiri, Jan 14, 2012.

  1. hoytedow
    Joined: Sep 2009
    Posts: 5,854
    Likes: 403, Points: 93, Legacy Rep: 2489
    Location: Control Group

    hoytedow Carbon Based Life Form

    That would depend upon the scale of the chart used.
     
  2. michael pierzga
    Joined: Dec 2008
    Posts: 4,862
    Likes: 116, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 1180
    Location: spain

    michael pierzga Senior Member

    Also Im not aware of the AIS update time Once a minute...20 times per minute ???. The system must be dampened to prevent erronous reporting. AIS is not a navigation tool...its a reporting system .
     
  3. powerabout
    Joined: Nov 2007
    Posts: 2,949
    Likes: 67, Points: 48, Legacy Rep: 719
    Location: Melbourne/Singapore/Italy

    powerabout Senior Member

    passenger vessel that size is mandatory fit with ecdis, paper is for yachties
     
  4. powerabout
    Joined: Nov 2007
    Posts: 2,949
    Likes: 67, Points: 48, Legacy Rep: 719
    Location: Melbourne/Singapore/Italy

    powerabout Senior Member

    The update rate is dependant on the vessel speed
    yes I agree but the AIS has your GPS data in it as in the same data you are navigating with unless you have diff data in your plotter
    I will ask the SAM guys here in Singapore what kit they have( the boat has a full SAM supplied bridge)
     
  5. powerabout
    Joined: Nov 2007
    Posts: 2,949
    Likes: 67, Points: 48, Legacy Rep: 719
    Location: Melbourne/Singapore/Italy

    powerabout Senior Member

    class A update rate:
    under 3kts = every 3 minutes
    over 3kts to 10kts every 10 secs, change course its 3.5 secs
    14-23kts its 6 secs, change course its 2 secs
    anything over 23kts 2 secs
     
  6. hoytedow
    Joined: Sep 2009
    Posts: 5,854
    Likes: 403, Points: 93, Legacy Rep: 2489
    Location: Control Group

    hoytedow Carbon Based Life Form

    If the cartographer works under a standard that says data transfer onto chart must be within 0.01 inches of accurate location, on a chart with a scale of 1 inch = 1 mile the object plotted on the chart can be as much as 52.8 feet from its actual position. The greater the ratio, the greater the innacuracy. At a scale of 1 inch = 250k inches, the actual line may represent an inaccuracy of over 208 feet and that is assuming the cartographer (and the quality assurance editor) did a top-notch job.
     
  7. hoytedow
    Joined: Sep 2009
    Posts: 5,854
    Likes: 403, Points: 93, Legacy Rep: 2489
    Location: Control Group

    hoytedow Carbon Based Life Form

    That being said, getting within 1000 feet by chart navigation of any charted offshore hazard to navigation is just stupid.
     
  8. powerabout
    Joined: Nov 2007
    Posts: 2,949
    Likes: 67, Points: 48, Legacy Rep: 719
    Location: Melbourne/Singapore/Italy

    powerabout Senior Member

    yes too true but a modern chart ( god knows when that area was surveyed) will be done with dgps and soundings so can be accurate to under the 10cm very easily
     
  9. hoytedow
    Joined: Sep 2009
    Posts: 5,854
    Likes: 403, Points: 93, Legacy Rep: 2489
    Location: Control Group

    hoytedow Carbon Based Life Form

    The data is only as good as the pen that draws it, no matter how accurate. Even a printer is limited by the number of DPI it can print.
     
  10. powerabout
    Joined: Nov 2007
    Posts: 2,949
    Likes: 67, Points: 48, Legacy Rep: 719
    Location: Melbourne/Singapore/Italy

    powerabout Senior Member

    Hoytedow
    Forget pencil and paper and move to the digital age
    survey to ecids does not involve paper ( anymore) ( well ok raster does but vector charts do not)
    Thes guys can update their own charts/database with their own data
     
    1 person likes this.
  11. liki
    Joined: Nov 2008
    Posts: 221
    Likes: 12, Points: 18, Legacy Rep: 114
    Location: Finland

    liki Senior Member

    Local news say that Schettino claimed to have stumbled in the crowd and fallen into a lifeboat. Gave me a good laughter.
     
  12. michael pierzga
    Joined: Dec 2008
    Posts: 4,862
    Likes: 116, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 1180
    Location: spain

    michael pierzga Senior Member

    Besides...the chart was clear, the radar dont lie ,your eyes work and youre simply foolish to navigate that close to the coast on any craft at night. The ship hit the island..not an off shore reef.

    Regardless of navigation accuracy its just stupid to be that close to shore at night.... From the bridge of a ship its Not easy to see two guys in a little inshore wooden fish boat, many times you only see them when the fisherman throws his cigarette overboard and you spot its comet.

    My EDICS Admiraily charts dont have sufficient detain of Giglio for close in navigation.
     
  13. powerabout
    Joined: Nov 2007
    Posts: 2,949
    Likes: 67, Points: 48, Legacy Rep: 719
    Location: Melbourne/Singapore/Italy

    powerabout Senior Member

    so if they only had admirality charts then I guess he's in the ****
     
  14. Arch99
    Joined: Jan 2012
    Posts: 0
    Likes: 0, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 10
    Location: New York

    Arch99 New Member

    Like Neotus and Salamackll, I was happy to find this expert site in the swamp of undetailed and incorrect media coverage of this event. It is a pleasure to hear real news first from those who understand the situation. Thanks to Daquiri and all of the other posters. With some experience in small boat sailing and (better organized) cruise ship journeys I am curious about the way one error in judgement after another brought things to this result.
    One question: I see some references to crew having done a 'crash stop' by dropping one or both anchors, causing the ship to pivot into its current postion. I understand this as a theory, at least on a small boat, but having watched cruise ships anchor out from a port it seems unlikely this could be done so quickly, especially given the inexperienced captain and unresponsive and disorganized crew. The port side anchor is not visible in photos, since the bow is submerged. Thoughts on this? A brilliant manouver or just more stupidity?
    Also I wonder about a previous post; why not just bring the ship (still heading north) alongside the jetty or run in to the beach as an emergency thing, is there some logic to the U turn they ended up doing?
     
  15. bntii
    Joined: Jun 2006
    Posts: 730
    Likes: 97, Points: 28, Legacy Rep: 1324
    Location: MD

    bntii Senior Member

    My thought as well- see my post #179

    Flat bottomed ship- head on beaching would have seemed like having the best chance of holding her upright as she filled...
     

  • Loading...
    Forum posts represent the experience, opinion, and view of individual users. Boat Design Net does not necessarily endorse nor share the view of each individual post.
    When making potentially dangerous or financial decisions, always employ and consult appropriate professionals. Your circumstances or experience may be different.