High Performance MPX Foil/Self-righting Trimaran-The Test Model

Fire Arrow Variation and Fire Arrow

Its so shallow here-do you have any ideas how I could deal with that better than I already am?
In the first tests(2nd day) with the Fire Arrow model, I had inadvertently made the main foil wands too long and the ama foils didn't have enough area. And the rudder on the boat had too much authority. The result was that the thing would jump clear of the water, pitch up and mush back down as the foils stalled and even though that second test overpowered the rig substantially no capsize -not even close. However, she did do a beautiful 45-50 degree pitch pole*, righted herself and sailed away. The "two stage ama" and crossarm dihedral allows there to still be lots of righting moment up to and a little past 90 degrees.

* skippers fault
 

Attachments

  • MPX jumping clear 2.jpg
    MPX jumping clear 2.jpg
    90.6 KB · Views: 374
I don't know how you can improve your situation, but perhaps there are some advantages that you haven't thought of.

When I was a kid in St. Petersburg, there were some knee-deep flats that were great for sailing models. I could be right there with them, instead of on-shore. These were free-sailing models though, so there were no worries about getting an RC controller wet.
 
Fire Arrow Variation and Fire Arrow

I'm not concerned about the model or models-just the fullsize version.... Pounding the foils or side of the ama into the bottom is worrisome. I guess the best answer for shallow water is to make it as hard as possible to roll past 40-45 degrees?
 
Fire Arrow Variation-full size

I've done some preliminary design work on the Variation based on the Fire Arrow using Welbourn -type ama hydrofoils instead of uptip ama foils. No decision about going ahead with a crowd funding proposal yet but if I build anything in the next three years it will likely be similar to this. Primary goal is extreme comfort and excellent performance including takeoff in around 5 knots of wind. The boat will have very shallow draft between 2 and 3' off the foils and less when flying. The boat will be able to sail without the lifting foils-though not as fast.

LOA 14'/4.27m
--
Beam 8'/2.44m
---beam with ama foils deployed 15'/4.57m
--
Weight-
--- boat ready to fly minus crew--190lb/81.8kg
--- boat + crew--380lb/172.7kg
--
Sail Area-
--- upwind-150 sq.ft./13.9sq.m
--- downwind- 270sq.ft./25sq.m
 
Last edited:
Fire Arrow Variation and Fire Arrow

The Fire Arrow concept using Welbourn foils should work real well in light air and heavy air and would have the power to be fast as well. I think using the Welbourn foils on a small tri is a good way to have a relatively narrow platform for a 14' tri(8') but have the power to carry sail of a much wider "normal" tri.
The lifting main foil has advantages in addition to allowing the boat the boat to lift off in light air-including enhanced pitch control.
If the beam was reduced to allow the boat to fly without the main foil* it wouldn't allow the sail area of the tri or allow the crew to just sit-he or she would have to hike and/or use a trapeze. The tri configuration with the Fire Arrow main foil allows the crew to be able to sit comfortably while sailing very fast or very slow.
* beam would have to be a little under 4' if the model in the picture was scaled down to 14' but it would be a blast to sail if you could hike and/or use a wire.
Thanks for taking a look at the idea.......
=====================================

The idea of using Welbourn foils on a small tri seems to have some great advantages on a small tri-mainly allowing the platform to be only 8' wide yet have the RM of a much greater beam. The more I study this the more convinced I am that it will work very well.


sljh40.png
 
Fire Arrow Variation and Fire Arrow

Below are some of the major advantages of the Fire Arrow concept most of which will work the same way on the 14' Fire Arrow Variation:

--
Probably the most significant feature of the Fire Arrow is that it uses two completely independent altitude control systems for the first time on any trimaran:
1) UptiP or Welbourn-type ama foils(also a first for any size trimaran*) that control the height of the ama above the water,
*used on this boat way before they were used on any other tri.
2) Wand controlled mainfoil on the daggerboard-controls main hull height above the water which, in turn, sets the angle of heel for the whole boat.The mainfoil also allows the main hull to fly in very light air.(5mph)
But it's the interrelationship between the main and rudder T-foil with the ama foil* that makes the system so significant. The rudder T-foil is a trailing foil and "follows" the main foil. Altitude and angle of heel for the whole boat are set by adjusting the wand length. The angle of heel can be set between 10 degrees and 17 degrees. The boat is extremely stable in pitch because of the bi-foil arrangement on the main hull-the daggerboard foil and rudder foil always work together to control pitch when the boat is foiling. But they also control the ride angle and pitch of the ama foil* which can't pitch on its own-in other words the ama foil can't all of a sudden "go negative" and cause a pitch pole.
* either Welbourn-type ama foil or uptip ama foil

==========================

3) A major advantage of the wand controlled mainfoil is the ability of the wand to cause the foil to create downforce which can add significantly to the righting moment of the boat. It is an automatic response to the boat heeling even a slight amount: the wand will cause the flap to go up as much as is necessary to restore the main hull to its designed flight altitude. That can add a large amount of righting moment to the boat.(40-60% of boat weight or a bit more). Downforce will have just as significant a role on the 14' Fire Arrow Variation using the Welbourn-type foils as it has on the Test Model. The gust response feature of the wand controlled main foil will work exactly the same way on the smaller boat creating nearly instantaneous additional RM as required.The creation of downforce by the main foil flap also results in lift to weather that will help with upwind performance if the boat is sailed with constant down force.(see sketch below)
The use of foil downforce has been well proven on the Trifoiler ,Rave, Skat, Osprey, S9 and Whisper. And the drag caused by doing this is not as much a disadvantage as the extra RM is an advantage.

=======================

4) Two Stage ama(see pix below) : the ama hull is attached to a "curved piece" that adds to the ama buoyancy in knockdown conditions. This "two-stage" design allows for a small planing hull with relatively low drag during incidental contact with the water but provides tremendous buoyancy during a knockdown-enough; combined with the high dihedral crossarm structure, to prevent a capsize in most conditions.The Fire Arrow Variation will use a Two-Stage Ama as well-but with some differences including a relatively longer and narrower hull.
--
5) Oversquare platform: the boat is 1.22 times as wide as it is long. A "normal" tri with that much beam would need at least 15mph of wind to be able to fly the main hull. But because of the wand controlled main foil, this boat will fly the main hull in as little as 5 mph of wind which opens up the effective wind range for the foiling system-way beyond most multihull foilers. For the Fire Arrow Variation one of the advantages is that an oversquare beam is not necessary to achieve high RM since the Welbourn-type foils provide lift equal to more than the weight of the boat substantially to outboard of the lee ama. This in turn, provides tremendous Righting Moment for a relatively narrow platform.
--
6) Light Air Foiling: from a marketing perspective selling a foiler that only starts to foil in 10-15mph of wind is a mistake but that has been true of many multihull foilers. More and more boats are targeting starting to foil in lighter winds: The Whisper foiling cat and Quant 23 are examples of foilers whose designer/builder has made the commitment to start flying in light air. The Fire Arrow test model was designed to begin to foil in a 5mph wind 5 years ago and reached that design goal on July 24, 2014. The full size version will take off in about the same wind speed.
The Fire Arrow Variation will have the same design goal to take off in very light air as does the larger 19.5' version and as demonstrated by the Test Model.

=====================


2ih44dj.jpg


28tls8.jpg
 
Last edited:
Fire Arrow Variation and Fire Arrow-mainfoil options

So far in the limited model testing I'm convinced that the dual wand* controlled main foil works best because it's 100% automatic and requires no crew attention.
In the last test of the model, the foil system ,including the wand controlled main foil, worked 100% perfectly in light air foiling.
* one midship wand on each side of main hull-windward wand clears the water when flying.
There are other types of main foil that might be worth experimenting with on the Test Model or the 14 footer if it is built:
1) Surface Piercing T-foil--Advantage-no moving parts; low drag when racing. Disadvantage-no automatic downforce for gust response and/or more power in stronger wind. Increase in drag as outboard tips breach the surface.
Possible loss of automatic pitch control with no facility for downforce.
Highly experimental version could have upside down asymmetrical section for automatic downforce when boat pitches down.
--
2) Manual mainfoil flap control--Advantage-less drag when racing; full control of mainfoil and flight altitude including downforce. Disadvantage-requires constant attention. This could be done in such a way as to allow wand control or manual control on demand-in other words the control system could be switched between manual and wand control with a retractable wand.

2ldj6a0.jpg
 
Fire Arrow Foiling System Testing and Development

Here is a concept model of a 12' X 17' wide concept model using the Fire Arrow system-ama foils not shown:

15ppi02.jpg
 
Found a detailed article on crowdfunding as applied to building prototype boats-may be a solution for the Fire Arrow!!
http://www.boatdesign.net/forums/hy...-semi-rigid-sails-money-56514.html#post787272

Good topic, lousy post.
-the link is just to another of your posts, and that post has a link that is not to any germane information, just a well known publication we may or may not subscribe to and a page number -without indicating the magazine month or series number.

A dozen clicks and I can't help feeling I would be better off just searching on google or bing.

You post a lot, is it too much to ask that you be more direct?
 
I can't see crowdfunding working for that unless there are lots of people keen to get their hands on one of your boats, so you're going to need to sell it a lot better. That means lots of video of the model foiling (upwind and down) for long lengths of time, because people will never trust it enough to put their money into it otherwise.

Another thing you should do is cost it to show that you're serious: produce a list of the expected costs of making or buying each part (materials and time), then look to see if you can make a prototype on the cheap by cheating (e.g. by replacing the amas with kayaks) in order to prove the design works with the minimum amount of stuff - you only need just enough hull to float and to hold the foils firmly in the right places, and low enough drag to take off (even if that means doing so with a much higher wind speed than the 5 knots that you hope the real thing will need - you have plenty of leeway to build a heavy prototype that should still foil). If some of the foils can be borrowed from an existing design of boat, it might be worth changing the size of the prototype to match the size of the available foils.

I don't know if the demand for your boat will ever be strong enough to get it off the ground unless you go bigger and stick a cabin on it - that would offer speed with stability in a category of boat that offers much more for the money than a sit-on toy with an extreme price tag. Such a design should be much more attractive than the cat equivalents which can flip over too easily and would open up the possibility of using it for long sea crossings at high speed without extreme risk, but I suspect that existing companies will pinch the idea and get there first, which leads me to think that your best bet may be to team up with one of them.
 
Pro Boat

Good topic, lousy post.
-the link is just to another of your posts, and that post has a link that is not to any germane information, just a well known publication we may or may not subscribe to and a page number -without indicating the magazine month or series number.

A dozen clicks and I can't help feeling I would be better off just searching on google or bing.

You post a lot, is it too much to ask that you be more direct?
===================
I figured that there are a lot of professionals that visit boatdesign.net that would like a heads up on great articles in this issue of ProBoat. Didn't have the time or inclination to post the whole article.
They spoke of the three main platforms Kicktarter , Indiegogo and Fundable. One of their "case histories" was the Rave V that wasn't able to raise all their money but was able to keep part of it by making a deal with the "investors".
Subs to ProBoat are free if you are an industry person or related in some way.
 
I can't see crowdfunding working for that unless there are lots of people keen to get their hands on one of your boats, so you're going to need to sell it a lot better. That means lots of video of the model foiling (upwind and down) for long lengths of time, because people will never trust it enough to put their money into it otherwise.

Another thing you should do is cost it to show that you're serious: produce a list of the expected costs of making or buying each part (materials and time), then look to see if you can make a prototype on the cheap by cheating (e.g. by replacing the amas with kayaks) in order to prove the design works with the minimum amount of stuff - you only need just enough hull to float and to hold the foils firmly in the right places, and low enough drag to take off (even if that means doing so with a much higher wind speed than the 5 knots that you hope the real thing will need - you have plenty of leeway to build a heavy prototype that should still foil). If some of the foils can be borrowed from an existing design of boat, it might be worth changing the size of the prototype to match the size of the available foils.

I don't know if the demand for your boat will ever be strong enough to get it off the ground unless you go bigger and stick a cabin on it - that would offer speed with stability in a category of boat that offers much more for the money than a sit-on toy with an extreme price tag. Such a design should be much more attractive than the cat equivalents which can flip over too easily and would open up the possibility of using it for long sea crossings at high speed without extreme risk, but I suspect that existing companies will pinch the idea and get there first, which leads me to think that your best bet may be to team up with one of them.
===========
Thanks for your thoughts David. I've written a lot about it above but the probability is that the proto(Fire Arrow Variation or Wolf) will be 14' by 8' and use Welbourn foils instead of UptitP foils. That allows the platform to be trailerable w/o folding or plug-ins and the Welbourn ama foils allow for tremendous RM as well as being able to retract them 100 % and still sail very well. One of the keys for me is that the seating on each side will be extremely comfortable providing a lot of back support and, of course, that the boat foils in very light air.
The story about Maserati above probably precludes much more model testing EXCEPT that I may decide to change the amas and add Welbourn foils for video purposes. However, thats still up in the air.
My biggest problem with crowd funding is what to give the investors. One idea(if its even legal) is a sort of lottery that would be designed to raise enough capital to build two proto's one of which would go to the winner. There are other ideas as well. The boat or boats would be mostly built by Falcon assuming they have the capacity when I'm ready. Assembly and building the Welbourn foil plugs/quicky molds I would do.
The rig design will be a combination effort between me,Scot Morgan, Hugh Welbourn(I hope) and Matt( hope) at Falcon-and maybe CST. It will use an endplate main similar to the newest A Cat rigs and similar to one I conceived of 15 years or more ago. And it will be very light so I can step the carbon mast.
--
I'm convinced that a proto has to be built that will function and look like a production boat. We know what works so testing will be tweaking for best performance-not to prove that anything "works"-thats been done already by the Fire Arrow Test Model, the Quant 23 and by Maserati!
 
When I look at those benches, I can imagine them folding upwards and then inwards together, creating a small rainproof cabin which someone could sleep in (if the beams are moved further apart). For very little extra cost and weight you would be adding a lot of extra value for the customer, broadening the appeal of the boat and making it easier for them to justify buying something that's more than just an ultra-expensive dinghy.
 
Forum posts represent the experience, opinion, and view of individual users. Boat Design Net does not necessarily endorse nor share the view of each individual post.
When making any potentially dangerous or financial decision, always employ and consult appropriate professionals. Your circumstances or experience may be different.

  • Back
    Top