Containerable Motorsailers

Discussion in 'Motorsailers' started by Guillermo, May 19, 2006.

  1. Wellydeckhand

    Wellydeckhand Previous Member

    I think the present boat can be split into 3 container and shipped, still consider containerable yes?
     
  2. may be not containerable..... but for sure road able
     

    Attached Files:

    • a2.jpg
      a2.jpg
      File size:
      46.7 KB
      Views:
      343
    • a3.jpg
      a3.jpg
      File size:
      198.1 KB
      Views:
      368
    • a4.jpg
      a4.jpg
      File size:
      204.9 KB
      Views:
      386
    • a5.jpg
      a5.jpg
      File size:
      163.6 KB
      Views:
      352
    • a6.jpg
      a6.jpg
      File size:
      150.3 KB
      Views:
      340
    • a7.jpg
      a7.jpg
      File size:
      148.9 KB
      Views:
      365
    • a8.jpg
      a8.jpg
      File size:
      149.9 KB
      Views:
      368
    • a9.jpg
      a9.jpg
      File size:
      65.1 KB
      Views:
      349
    • a11.jpg
      a11.jpg
      File size:
      59.3 KB
      Views:
      374
  3. frank marsden
    Joined: May 2006
    Posts: 20
    Likes: 1, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 12
    Location: Rugby, England

    frank marsden Junior Member

    Concept Boat

    I designed a similar boat as an entry in the BMIF (British Marine Industry Federation) Concept Boat competition three years ago, the advantage being that international transport is cheap.

    The judges did not like the idea.
     
  4. Post some pictures of Your boat Frank, I will like to see.
     
  5. frank marsden
    Joined: May 2006
    Posts: 20
    Likes: 1, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 12
    Location: Rugby, England

    frank marsden Junior Member

    Concept boat

    Mine was only a design, never built.

    When I saw some designs submitted which were 'Highly recommended', nothing more than some burr walnut applied to a typical high speed power boat, I lost interest in the competition and threw the drawings way.

    It was designed to fit inside the largest container , 42 foot??
    On measuring a container it became clear that the full internal width could not always be used, and a lifting keel was also necessary.

    A transportation issue was that a purpose designed cradle is necessary, which could easily get separated from the boat location.
     
  6. frank marsden
    Joined: May 2006
    Posts: 20
    Likes: 1, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 12
    Location: Rugby, England

    frank marsden Junior Member

    Concept Boat

    I have asked BMIF to see if they have retained a copy
     
  7. FAST FRED
    Joined: Oct 2002
    Posts: 4,519
    Likes: 111, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 1009
    Location: Conn in summers , Ortona FL in winter , with big d

    FAST FRED Senior Member

    "On measuring a container it became clear that the full internal width could not always be used, and a lifting keel was also necessary.

    A transportation issue was that a purpose designed cradle is necessary, which could easily get separated from the boat location."

    It would seem that if the boat had a long steel shoe , simply greasing some lumber and pushing would get it in or out of the container.

    If the size / beam were done with hefty rub rails , only some fenders blown up on place should stabelize her while in the Box.

    A lightweight cruiser such as this will skid easily on greased lumber.

    FAST FRED
     
  8. frank marsden
    Joined: May 2006
    Posts: 20
    Likes: 1, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 12
    Location: Rugby, England

    frank marsden Junior Member

    concept boat

    Yes, agree,

    I was concerned that handling in ports may not be all that is desired.

    The necessary baulks would also reduce the beam of the boat, and that is already very narrow.

    I was somewhat surprised that there are no double width containers, there must be wider loads that would benefit.
     
  9. Yes, right, handling in ports it is expensive and has to be very easy. Anyway if the width do not exceed 1 ft per part an open container or flat track could be used and cost isn't a lot more than normal container.
     
  10. frank marsden
    Joined: May 2006
    Posts: 20
    Likes: 1, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 12
    Location: Rugby, England

    frank marsden Junior Member

    containerable boat

    Does that mean that 8ft beam is acceptable?
     
  11. it is more costly but it is acceptable.
     
  12. Raggi_Thor
    Joined: Jan 2004
    Posts: 2,457
    Likes: 64, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 711
    Location: Trondheim, NORWAY

    Raggi_Thor Nav.arch/Designer/Builder

    Is 8 feet much more costly than 7.5?
     
  13. forgot: the 45 ft high cube 9 ft tall are available on some companies, not all.
     

  14. Wellydeckhand

    Wellydeckhand Previous Member

    They call it super 40 ft and normal 40ft, the super 40ft for International line and would be transfer to normal 20 ft for inter-island transport. It is advise to use the normal 40 ft container..... accepted everywhere.

    WDH
     
    1 person likes this.
Forum posts represent the experience, opinion, and view of individual users. Boat Design Net does not necessarily endorse nor share the view of each individual post.
When making potentially dangerous or financial decisions, always employ and consult appropriate professionals. Your circumstances or experience may be different.