Best drafting software

Discussion in 'Software' started by brissyben, Oct 12, 2010.

  1. Raggi_Thor
    Joined: Jan 2004
    Posts: 2,457
    Likes: 64, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 711
    Location: Trondheim, NORWAY

    Raggi_Thor Nav.arch/Designer/Builder

    I sell Rhino, Bricscad and Alibre,
    Some of my customers use all of them, Rhino for hull modeling and unfolding, Alibre for some of the structure and general (more mechanical) 3D and quick illustrations (isometrics) , and Bricscad for 2D layouts and sending dxf/dwg to cnc cutters.
     
  2. MikeJohns
    Joined: Aug 2004
    Posts: 3,192
    Likes: 208, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 2054
    Location: Australia

    MikeJohns Senior Member

  3. Raggi_Thor
    Joined: Jan 2004
    Posts: 2,457
    Likes: 64, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 711
    Location: Trondheim, NORWAY

    Raggi_Thor Nav.arch/Designer/Builder

    I'm not neutral here, but I think it's better to pay a few hundred dollars or euros for Bricscad :)
    For example you ave no Lisp or VBA in DraftSight(?).
    A few macros can really speed up repetitive tasks.
     
  4. MikeJohns
    Joined: Aug 2004
    Posts: 3,192
    Likes: 208, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 2054
    Location: Australia

    MikeJohns Senior Member

  5. Raggi_Thor
    Joined: Jan 2004
    Posts: 2,457
    Likes: 64, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 711
    Location: Trondheim, NORWAY

    Raggi_Thor Nav.arch/Designer/Builder

    Yeah, I see, and as I said, remember I am a reseller also :)

    Rhino can make quite good dxf and dwgs, but you have to open those file in an AutoCAD compatible program to check accuracy and cnc-ability. And then, since you need this other program, you can also do dimensioning, layouts, plotting etc there.
     
  6. ACuttle
    Joined: Aug 2008
    Posts: 85
    Likes: 3, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 40
    Location: UK

    ACuttle Marine Design Engineer

    I've got a copy of Alibre but never used it much in anger, how does it do with marine work, is there a maxium sixe that it can comfortably handle? In my experience even a big workstation struggled with solidworks in 25m+ vessels.
     
  7. Man Overboard
    Joined: Oct 2006
    Posts: 246
    Likes: 13, Points: 18, Legacy Rep: 129
    Location: Wisconsin

    Man Overboard Tom Fugate

    Is there anyone who has used both Rhino and Maxsurf/Workshop? (recently) Can you comment on the strengths and weaknesses of each?
     
  8. MikeJohns
    Joined: Aug 2004
    Posts: 3,192
    Likes: 208, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 2054
    Location: Australia

    MikeJohns Senior Member

    Rhino is a great surface generation package and a good boat design tool.

    Workshop is very limited IMO and I often draw my structures in Rhino now just sectioning the hull shape. I don't even use Hydromax much now with the Rhinomarine addin (Orca is still not as good).

    Rhino's main weakness is the plotting of structural details. Frankly it's poor since it's not WYSIWYG you have to plot preview the drawing to see what you really get. Line thicknesses are by layer and linetye scales are by text mod of an ini file. Dimensioning is poor so it's worth using another CADS package for technical drawings in the boat is being built from paper plans. If The yard has Rhino then you just send the drawings and there's no problems.
     
  9. Rig Pig
    Joined: Oct 2010
    Posts: 1
    Likes: 0, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 10
    Location: Gulf of Mexico

    Rig Pig New Member

    Thinking about taking an online course dealing with this (I have zero experience with CAD or boat design).

    They have two different software packages (price shown) one if for the Rhino software - the other includes the "Flamingo/Penguin/Bongo" bundle.

    Rhino version 4.0, Educational Pricing ($195 plus maximum US shipping) $215
    Rhino/Flamingo/Penguin/Bongo bundle educational license (shipping at actual cost) $495

    I don't have any clue what the Flamingo/Penguin/Bongo bundle is.

    Is it worth the extra money?
     
  10. Man Overboard
    Joined: Oct 2006
    Posts: 246
    Likes: 13, Points: 18, Legacy Rep: 129
    Location: Wisconsin

    Man Overboard Tom Fugate

  11. ACuttle
    Joined: Aug 2008
    Posts: 85
    Likes: 3, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 40
    Location: UK

    ACuttle Marine Design Engineer

    I've used both for a fair while, I prefer to use Maxsurf to model and fair the hulls then Rhino to detail and develop them.

    Maxsurf is great for fairing and starting a hull-form but really falls down for me when you try to trim surfaces or keep things flat/parallel. Rhino is very strong and has more tools than you'll ever typically need in project but it has a few annoying short-comings and it doesn't give you any function for constantly updating section lines which I use a lot in Maxsurf. Rhino is fairly bad at any intensive drafting or 2D work but then Maxsurf doesn't do that at all. I've not had chance/reason to use any of the Rhino plugins.

    If I had to have one I'd go for Rhino but would rather have both. I've not used workshop but folk I know do and they're often complaining about it.
     
  12. Raggi_Thor
    Joined: Jan 2004
    Posts: 2,457
    Likes: 64, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 711
    Location: Trondheim, NORWAY

    Raggi_Thor Nav.arch/Designer/Builder

    I think a few thousand parts is OK, but parts where one boundary is an imported surface (like a hull from Rhino) seems to be much heavier to handle than simple extrusions or lofts. On my laptop both Rhino and Alibre is getting slow sometimes with a 12m aluminum boat. Alibre (and SolidWorks) is better at drawing production than Rhino is, isometric workshop drawings for example.
     
  13. ACuttle
    Joined: Aug 2008
    Posts: 85
    Likes: 3, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 40
    Location: UK

    ACuttle Marine Design Engineer

    Slow with a 12m boat doesn't sound too good. You might have a better idea of the limitations as a reseller, is that because Alibre handles curved surfaces particularly badly or is it just a typical limitation of working with larger sized files?

    I might have to find a small project to do in Alibre and see how it goes, I've recommend it to a few people as a economical version of Solidworks and been pretty impressed with what it can do.

    Yes, I've been back to using autocad recently to do some drawings and have been missing solidworks function for that.
     
  14. Raggi_Thor
    Joined: Jan 2004
    Posts: 2,457
    Likes: 64, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 711
    Location: Trondheim, NORWAY

    Raggi_Thor Nav.arch/Designer/Builder

    Let' see how much the 2011 version is, released yesterday.
    As a reseller I always try to be honest, and I thinks surface modelling is not the strongest part of Alibre. SW and maybe Inventor (now?) is better at that. BUT, importing rather "clean" surfaces from Rhino works OK, better than the often "dirty" IGES you get from several yacht design programs. So clean up, rebuild, smoothen, your surfaces in Rhino and then import to Alibre (or SW).

    It's also about relationships between parts. Drawing a sketch for a frame or bulkhead and "extrude to the skin (hull)" is no problem in one part, but if you do this in many parts in an assembly it seems like the constraints between parts get time consuming to manage. If you simplify parts and make them "dead", not linked to the skin, "frosen", then everything speeds up, but you miss some of the points with "feature based parametric design" :)
     

  15. bhnautika
    Joined: Feb 2006
    Posts: 852
    Likes: 57, Points: 38, Legacy Rep: 571
    Location: australia

    bhnautika Senior Member

    Attached Files:

Loading...
Forum posts represent the experience, opinion, and view of individual users. Boat Design Net does not necessarily endorse nor share the view of each individual post.
When making potentially dangerous or financial decisions, always employ and consult appropriate professionals. Your circumstances or experience may be different.