CT249
Senior Member
- Joined
- May 2, 2003
- Messages
- 1,640
- Reaction score
- 266
- Location
- Sydney Australia
... Ummm where did I say that?
Are you saying people didn't think the idea of commercial flight was crazy? Or that everyone expected they would one day have horseless carriages, cell phones that they would text on as they crossed a street and personal computers they used on airplanes lol ... those last ones I remember!!
Come on man, those people who started that revolution were called stark raving mad!
Actually, prominent people thought the idea of commercial flight was viable long before it actually was viable. Major "establishment" figures such as Octave Chanute, Alexander Graham Bell, the head of the Smithsonian and the US Congress all got involved in heavier-than-air design and the German, British and other governments put huge sums into commercial lighter-than-air craft. In fact the odd thing was that the "establishment" took the Wright Brothers seriously when even their home-town newspaper ignored them.
The first promoted attempt at commercial flight (which occurred in the 1840s) was "crazy". They promised international flight via steam-powered aircraft but they hadn't worked out how to get it to take off or how to control itself when it did. As far as I know, the grandiose scheme added nothing to the later development of commercial flight.
What did kick off commercial flight was when a couple of brothers were fascinated by a little hand-held toy flying machine. That gave them a long interest in heavier-than-air flight. When one of them decided to get involved seriously, he did NOT take wild inspiration from the earliest attempts at commercial flight or design grandiose sketches - he wrote to the Smithsonian and asked for all the scientific and technical material on the subject that he had, so that he could add his own little bit to the puzzle.
The true story of the invention of heavier-than-air flight runs directly against the idea that impractical grandiose doodles lead to development. What lead to development was people who combined practical knowledge and a new concept with knowledge of the scientific and technical investigation and development that had gone before them. There's some great stuff about this in "First to Fly" and "The Bishop's Boys" (books about the Wrights) and in similar works about Santos Dumont and Hugo Eckener.
The same sort of thing seems to have happened in sailing. I've been lucky enough to know or correspond with some of the early major figures in modern hydrofoils, multis and windsurfers, and all of them had outstanding knowledge of the basic physics and technology. I don't think any of them were inspired by soap bubbles. Even in something as comparatively simple as the early development of shortboard high-performance windsurfers, just about everyone had a very solid grasp of the basic concepts and physics and what materials would allow them to do. They (we) all had dreams of futuristic craft and feats, but they rested on knowledge of the real world factors involved.