Thanks daiquiri.
In attachment are the results of this method. Do you know where I can find some documentation about this method to study the results?
The speed: I don´t have nothing against speed. I think the faster we can go the better. But I like comfort. I prefer comfort instead of speed....
and the profile view
I followed PAR suggestion and decrease the beam. Now it has Beam: 2,47 and Beam WL: 1,93. The main reason for the initial beam was related with...
I am not trying to make a fast boat. Speed costs money. The regular use of this boat will be in a range of 30 miles. So for this range I think...
I agree with you. It’s wiser and safer to go one step at a time. Start small and when we get experience enough go to a bigger project. I...
I don’t have any idea of the market price for this type of projects, but I think that a homebuilder won’t buy a one-off design. My reference is...
Thanks, original post corrected :)
I understand your comments. It doesn´t make any sense to build what is already built. I agree with you. This isn’t the best way to get a boat....
Next Steps: Now I will draw the first approach for the lines.
First validation: With the target Cp and the information that we now have from Midship section we can check the displacement. With this...
Main sections: To draw these sections some decisions had to be made. This boat has an S/L ratio of 2,4. With this value it is classified as...
Main coefficients: Froud number (12kn): 0,72 Prismatic Coefficient (Fn 0,72): 0,65 I couldn’t find any table with the appropriate Cp for Fn...
Statistics: LOA/Beam: Reference: 3 - this boat: 2.96. This boat is a little longer that the average (for this beam) LWL/Displacement:...
