rwatson
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2007
- Messages
- 6,278
- Reaction score
- 544
- Location
- Tasmania,Australia
Great comments and very accurate points made in the previous posts. I thoroughly enjoyed hearing the points and trade-offs discussed.
Just a couple of points that came to mind as I read,
1) Having a Low stressed/low cost boat need not mean an inefficient hull design. There are plenty of low tech, well performing boats on the water - most hand built.
2) Traditional wooden boats are not better than more modern plywood or fibreglass boats in material performance, but there is a severe shortage of larger timbers for boat building. Traditional wooden boats are invariably heavier built due to the limitations of solid timber building. The makes them appear 'tough', but in actual fact, the bulk is to allow for the possible material defects. Solid timber has to allow for the undectable 'shake' or flaw found in natural materials.
Those 2 inch planks on the hull, if they were cut to 1/4", many of them would fail structurally as they came out of the saw. However, if you took all the 1/4" planks, and laminated them with epoxy, you would get a much stronger and longer lasting result. (like cold moulding, and you could then reduce the ribbing scantling dramatically )
A heavier hull may resist external impacts well, but it also creates more impact by its heavier hull - the mass of the boat makes a small impact more severe. The heavier mass also means more wear on anchor and dock gear, slower under sail and power and heavier equipment required to repair and maintain out of the water.
3) Using modern materials does not infer that you have to have a high stress/high cost boat.
Just a couple of points that came to mind as I read,
1) Having a Low stressed/low cost boat need not mean an inefficient hull design. There are plenty of low tech, well performing boats on the water - most hand built.
2) Traditional wooden boats are not better than more modern plywood or fibreglass boats in material performance, but there is a severe shortage of larger timbers for boat building. Traditional wooden boats are invariably heavier built due to the limitations of solid timber building. The makes them appear 'tough', but in actual fact, the bulk is to allow for the possible material defects. Solid timber has to allow for the undectable 'shake' or flaw found in natural materials.
Those 2 inch planks on the hull, if they were cut to 1/4", many of them would fail structurally as they came out of the saw. However, if you took all the 1/4" planks, and laminated them with epoxy, you would get a much stronger and longer lasting result. (like cold moulding, and you could then reduce the ribbing scantling dramatically )
A heavier hull may resist external impacts well, but it also creates more impact by its heavier hull - the mass of the boat makes a small impact more severe. The heavier mass also means more wear on anchor and dock gear, slower under sail and power and heavier equipment required to repair and maintain out of the water.
3) Using modern materials does not infer that you have to have a high stress/high cost boat.