I like trying to think of ways to make multihulls self-righting, and I came up with this one that might actually be a good idea. Thought I'd share:
(A sketch is attached, but I'll give my best description in case it doesn't come through.)
Imagine a monohull with a rigid wing sail, but there is another rigid wing attached to the bottom of the first at a 90 degree angle, such that the second wing sticks off the side of the boat. The two wings attach to the boat via a pivot, such that upon tacking the vertical wing is pushed to leeward and the horizontal wing is pushed up into vertical. The two wings are mirror-image identical, and each with a "leeboard" sticking 90 degrees off the tip of the wing.
The flip-flopping nature of this arrangement means that each wing can have a truly ideal aerodynamic shape for its respective tack, and that the same is true for the leeboard on each wing. If the leeboards have a wedge shape from root to tip, they can give progressively greater buoyant resistance to the wing in the vertical position, as well as effectively dampen the impact of the lee wing on the water when tacking. (a small pontoon may be needed to keep the wing tip out of the water) If done right, the leeboard will be pushed further into the water as it is needed, minimizing wetted surface area.
These wing-outriggers will need to be sufficiently sturdy as well as buoyant, and if they are, they will prevent the boat from becoming stable in an upside-down orientation, all without the need for lead ballast.
Another interesting aspect of this arrangement is that heeling forces will be disconnected from the hull, since the wing and outrigger connect by a pivot. This means the vessel will not heel, will rock less on the waves and be more comfortable. It also means that more wing weight up top will not make the boat unstable. This design could combine the best of mono and multihulls!
Being a rigid wing means there can be no reefing, but there will also be no flogging if the wing is allowed to rotate downwind. I don't know how much of a problem this would be. With the addition of two pivots in the "masts", the wings could be folded back astern for storms and docking.
My drawing includes stays that can both be used to support the wings, or operate wing folding.
What do you all think?
Phil
(A sketch is attached, but I'll give my best description in case it doesn't come through.)
Imagine a monohull with a rigid wing sail, but there is another rigid wing attached to the bottom of the first at a 90 degree angle, such that the second wing sticks off the side of the boat. The two wings attach to the boat via a pivot, such that upon tacking the vertical wing is pushed to leeward and the horizontal wing is pushed up into vertical. The two wings are mirror-image identical, and each with a "leeboard" sticking 90 degrees off the tip of the wing.
The flip-flopping nature of this arrangement means that each wing can have a truly ideal aerodynamic shape for its respective tack, and that the same is true for the leeboard on each wing. If the leeboards have a wedge shape from root to tip, they can give progressively greater buoyant resistance to the wing in the vertical position, as well as effectively dampen the impact of the lee wing on the water when tacking. (a small pontoon may be needed to keep the wing tip out of the water) If done right, the leeboard will be pushed further into the water as it is needed, minimizing wetted surface area.
These wing-outriggers will need to be sufficiently sturdy as well as buoyant, and if they are, they will prevent the boat from becoming stable in an upside-down orientation, all without the need for lead ballast.
Another interesting aspect of this arrangement is that heeling forces will be disconnected from the hull, since the wing and outrigger connect by a pivot. This means the vessel will not heel, will rock less on the waves and be more comfortable. It also means that more wing weight up top will not make the boat unstable. This design could combine the best of mono and multihulls!
Being a rigid wing means there can be no reefing, but there will also be no flogging if the wing is allowed to rotate downwind. I don't know how much of a problem this would be. With the addition of two pivots in the "masts", the wings could be folded back astern for storms and docking.
My drawing includes stays that can both be used to support the wings, or operate wing folding.
What do you all think?
Phil