I second the motion. It'd be totally worth it just for the entertainment of watching Doug spit chips.Could the mods move this to the motor sailer forum? Just for a bit of fun?
Come on, mods. You know you want to.
I second the motion. It'd be totally worth it just for the entertainment of watching Doug spit chips.Could the mods move this to the motor sailer forum? Just for a bit of fun?
I rather like the idea of using systems similar to the AC, where the hydraulics are powered by humans. It'd give the crew something to do apart from sitting on the rail, and would mean you could throw out the massive diesel and save some weight.
Any energy storage that is ultimately powered by the crew would be totally fine by me, providing it wasn't used to actually propel the boat via a prop or jet or dirty great windmill. In fact I can even see this resulting in useful spin-offs for cruisers.
Calling Wild Oats XI a "motorsailer" is hilarious.........
Ok, fair points.The problem is that winning could then mean that sailors then spend hours at a time spinning stationary bicycles down below to provide power, or something equally unpleasant.
It's not hard to visualise a chain gang spinning away down below on a stinking hot day when a calm has settled over Bass Strait after a big southerly. Sailors pedalling for hours at a time to waggle the keel and wind winches to rock and pump the boat and rig.....throwing up into the bilges because standing up down below in a leftover swell is unpleasant, gasping for air because there's no draft, backsides bleeding from the combination of saddle sores and salt water. Tactics and trim largely ignored because it's more efficient to devote all the available effort to turning pedals. And of course the level of experience on the boats, so vital in heavy conditions, will be lower because younger men can create much more power so the more experienced hands (over 35s) would be discarded. Women would be unlikely to be seen on competitive yachts, unless of course there is a sharp divide between sailors and galley slaves.
I race bikes for fun and I've done serious competition in sailing classes that allow pumping, and those experiences mean that I'd hate to see crews toiling away at creating power. It could also be relevant that the offshore races that do (or did) allow crews to propel boats have never attracted very strong fleets.
The alternative, of course, is to simply accept that sailing is a sport in which we harness the power of the wind in manually-handled sails and use stored power only for communication and illumination, just as in so many other sports.
Using manual power instead of wind power to drive a craft can really harm the sport. Windsurfer racing collapsed when unrestricted pumping was brought in. In many ways the powered canting 100 footers are the least popular "supermaxi" we've seen in many, many years which indicates that they attract very few owners, too.
It's interesting to see how few canters are being built these days for the ORCi, PHRF, IRC racing that most of the world prefers. Almost everyone has voted to stay with simple fixed keelers and manual winches.
What is the engine used for in WOXI? Just to provide elctricity or actually drive hydraulics? How many tacks/jibes are there in Sydney Hobart? Do they run the engine even while sailing several hours on the same tack?
What systems use the engine or power? Is the keel hydraulics even the most power hungry system? Imoca and VOR boats seem to handle canting keels in very long races and thus with very little engine use.
Calling all retro dudes and other interested parties- look at the canting keel on Comanche: