What Do We Think About Climate Change

Actually there are numerous methods to experimentally prove that CO2 is a green house gas

So kinda a no brainer there kids

Although some agnotists will still cling to the false claim it is not

 

is that your rebuttal?

"I'm right because you're a *****"

 

That is basically it.

Whatever is also toxic. If you ingest it in too high a percentage, your cell membranes will lyse and you will basically dissolve. Should we therefore make you pay a whatever tax for "making whatever"? You wouldn't want to leave too large a whatever "footprint". Perhaps we should put you in a room containing 99% whatever and see how you would fare.

http://icanhascheezburger.com/

 

Quack.

 

thank you, too much of anything is a pollutant

 

Water statement has been retracted.

 

you might just take the easy rout and look it up kids

looks pretty obvious its a naturally occurring substance that when found in harmful concentrations is considered a pollutant

and why is it found in unusually high concentrations throughout the worlds atmosphere
cause we are burning millions of years worth of accumulated oil and coal in just a few hundred
its pretty obvious guys you just need to cut through the hype and stick to the basic realities

yup its plant food just like water is but if you over water
under water
not enough dirt
to much dirt

you get the picture

 

Relative humidity

Atmospheric relative humidity has been decreasing from at least 1950, as per the NOAA data.

First image is for the 1000 mb level and second one for 300 mb (whole globe)

 

ok
so given that the deniers are also constantly spewing about how water vapor is the major contributing green house gas then it stands to reason that if water vapor is decreasing and temp is still increasing then there must be another factor involved. Like CO2 for instance, specially since the rise in CO2 corresponds perfectly with the rise in temp.

kinda looks like you shot yourself in the foot on that one Guillermo

want to try again

ps
just out of curiosity what does it pay to be an oil and gas internet shill Guillermo. There isn't really any logical reason why anyone would so consistently embarrass themselves like this unless they were getting paid for it. You have been exposed to many times presenting deceptive or misrepresenting data at this point and it just begs the question, why?

 

looks like the graph is not the whole story
once again we have not been presented with all the pertinent data in a seaming effort to belittle the IPCC's excellent predictive track record

from http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21223500/

and another

it goes on and on but basically about five seconds of research shows that once again either not all the data is being presented or data is being represented in a very misleading way by our favorite agnotist. atmospheric humidity is apparently in fact, increasing.

 

Today's date is 10 10 10, this thread has just passed 10101, has anyone changed their minds as a result of all the information and discussion that has taken place?

 

If you under CO2 your plants will die and then the bunnies will too.

I don't object if you want to hold your breath and reduce CO2, but don't tell me I can't breathe.

Your rights stop where my rights begin.

I am feeling very palindromic today.

 

I think all that excess co2 has cut off oxygen to the brains of the deniers

 

More melodramatic nonsense. Natural CO2 levels are hardly dependent on humanity. If we completely eliminated people, it wouldn't 'under CO2' the world.

Why do you even say such things, Hoyt? Just to hear your head rattle?

 

funny I heard more of a grinding sound and then some smoke