USCG tries to lengthen boats from 110 to 123 results disasterous

Discussion in 'Powerboats' started by sdowney717, Aug 21, 2011.

  1. sdowney717
    Joined: Nov 2010
    Posts: 852
    Likes: 32, Points: 28, Legacy Rep: 274
    Location: Newport News VA

    sdowney717 Senior Member

  2. Dave Gudeman
    Joined: Nov 2009
    Posts: 135
    Likes: 27, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 359
    Location: San Francisco, CA, USA

    Dave Gudeman Senior Member

    They spent $90M adding new steel to old hulls and when they were done the boats were ruined, apparently because of some mismatch between the old and new steel. Can anyone tell me if this sounds like a genuinely unforeseeable problem or if the shipyard just royally screwed up by using the wrong steel?

    And if it was a gamble why wouldn't they try it first with one boat instead of doing all five at once?
     
  3. PAR
    Joined: Nov 2003
    Posts: 19,133
    Likes: 473, Points: 93, Legacy Rep: 3967
    Location: Eustis, FL

    PAR Yacht Designer/Builder

    There could be a lot of explanations, but often it's a supplier that's supposed to sell them a specific grade, then substitute a different one to save some money or make a delivery deadline.
     
  4. SheetWise
    Joined: Jul 2004
    Posts: 279
    Likes: 54, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 658
    Location: Phoenix

    SheetWise All Beach -- No Water.

    It reads -- to me -- like a hit piece. There's always another side to the story, and when it comes out you usually have to wonder why it was ever a story in the first place. But then -- this is an AP story ... a lot of static and posturing with a few obligatory statements representing unverified facts.

    They should have focused on the lengthening of the ships, it probably would have developed into a good story -- and it appears to be a story worth pursuing. The rest of it is just noise.
     
  5. Mr Efficiency
    Joined: Oct 2010
    Posts: 8,003
    Likes: 356, Points: 83, Legacy Rep: 702
    Location: Australia

    Mr Efficiency Senior Member

    It's all bullship you think ?
     

  6. Stumble
    Joined: Oct 2008
    Posts: 1,896
    Likes: 71, Points: 48, Legacy Rep: 739
    Location: New Orleans

    Stumble Senior Member

    The yard that did the extension work is here in New Orleans, and it has been covered pretty heavily by the local news. Without making any prejudgments, it appears that the yard knew during the first refit that something wasn't right, exactly what was going wrong I don't know. And the psi testing for the extension was only running about 50% of the design spec. The yard then hid the testing results from the USCG, which raises some real issues in terms of liability.

    Assuming this is correct, it looks like the yard could be on the hook for the loss of at least the seven later refit ships, though the first one they may be able to pass the buck onto the designers, or suppliers.
     
Forum posts represent the experience, opinion, and view of individual users. Boat Design Net does not necessarily endorse nor share the view of each individual post.
When making potentially dangerous or financial decisions, always employ and consult appropriate professionals. Your circumstances or experience may be different.