The use of air

Discussion in 'Boat Design' started by JonathanCole, Nov 28, 2006.

  1. JonathanCole
    Joined: May 2005
    Posts: 442
    Likes: 8, Points: 18, Legacy Rep: 58
    Location: Hawaii

    JonathanCole imagineer

    Any comments?
    Slippery ships float on thin air

    • 18 February 2006
    • news service
    • Tim Thwaites
    [​IMG] Enlarge image
    Riding on air

    YOSHIAKI KODAMA is weaving a magic carpet large enough to carry a ship. Conjured up from thin air at the flick of a switch, this slippery blanket will help transport a fully laden tanker or container ship across the ocean at higher speed, and using far less fuel, than ever before.
    Kodama is director of the Advanced Maritime Transport Technology Department at Japan's National Maritime Research Institute (NMRI) in Tokyo. His work is just one of several major programmes under way in the US, Russia, Japan and Europe that focus on how to make ships more slippery.
    A craft that has less friction as it slides through the water will be far more efficient than standard ships. Slippery ships could travel across the sea much faster or carry a bigger load on the same amount of fuel, saving money and reducing pollution. This is crucial, considering that in 2003 more than 90 per cent of all goods that were sent around the globe went by ship - that's more than 6 billion tonnes, and the figure is set to increase.
    A recent report from the Maritime Research Institute Netherlands (MARIN), based in Wageningen, says that reducing the friction and hence the drag on a ship's hull could improve efficiency by up to 20 per cent. "There is currently no other technique in naval architecture that can promise such savings," it says.
    But how do you make a ship slippery? So far researchers have tried using tiny bubbles, slippery polymers and trapped sheets of air, and it seems that which method is best depends on what you want to achieve. If you simply wish to haul more cargo at a sedate 14 knots or so, in an environmentally responsible way using less fuel, then creating a carpet of microbubbles beneath a flat-bottomed hull may be the answer. On the other hand, the best option for a cargo ship expected to knife through the sea at more than 50 knots could be to cover the metal of the hull with a wall of air, effectively creating a boat in a bubble.
    The idea of drag reduction began when British engineer William Froude investigated the fluid dynamics of ships in the 19th century. As a ship moves through water it encounters three types of drag: wave drag, pressure drag and frictional drag. Wave resistance is mainly a problem at high speed, and can be minimised with a carefully designed hull. Streamlining can also almost eliminate pressure drag - the backwards pull generated by the pressure difference between the bow and stern as the water through which a ship passes divides and then recombines. The greatest component of drag, and the main problem to ship designers, is frictional drag. This comes from the interaction between the hull and the water around it. Its effect, says Kodama, means that a ship pulls a large body of water along with it as it moves.
    The region of water affected by the passage of a ship, known as the boundary layer, is usually measured in terms of the impact on flow past the hull. Typically, any water moving past the hull at less than 99 per cent of unobstructed flow is counted as part of the boundary layer. While the impact of a ship on the water around it decreases the further you move away from the hull, there are also variations between the bow and the stern. For a 300-metre-long ship, the boundary layer might be about half a metre thick at the bow, say, but tens of metres thick at the stern.
    Frictional drag has the greatest impact on the centimetre or so closest to the ship, where interactions between the metal hull and the water are the strongest. One possible way to reduce this was first attempted in the early 1970s by Michael McCormick and Rameswar Bhattacharyya at the US Naval Academy at Annapolis, Maryland. They coated a cylinder with small bubbles of hydrogen generated by electrolysis, and dragged it through water. The result was a significant reduction in friction. Over the next decade, researchers showed that such microbubbles could decrease frictional drag by up to 80 per cent. However, the effect was difficult to replicate on real vessels.
    Now researchers in Japan have decided to tackle this problem, and plan to turn the promise of microbubbles into reality as part of a programme to develop the "Super Eco-Ship". Led by Kodama, the project aims to reduce a ship's greenhouse gas emissions by a quarter while increasing its cargo capacity by 20 per cent, through a whole series of propulsion, control and design changes. Japan has a particular interest here, given that most of its imports and exports travel by ship.
    In theory, Kodama says, there is more than one mechanism by which microbubbles can help ships slip through water. First, the bubbles themselves form a sheet of air sandwiched between the water and the hull. Since the viscosity of air - its resistance to flow - is about 1 per cent that of water, the ship moves more easily.
    Another mechanism modifies the turbulence that frictional drag creates in the water. The less turbulence generated, the easier the movement of a ship through the water. The researchers have found experimentally that the bubbles directly modify turbulence, Kodama says. "In turbulent flow, bubbles at the bottom of the boundary layer are under very strong shear forces, and become highly deformed and rather flat." This change in shape seems to reduce turbulence, so frictional drag drops.
    Kodama's team thought that one way to coat the hull with microbubbles would be to divert a little spare power from the engine to generate bubbles near the bow of the ship by blowing compressed air through a slot or porous plate. These bubbles would be swept backwards to almost completely coat the flat-bottomed hull. The buoyancy of the bubbles would tend to hold them in place under the ship, and those that were lost would continuously be replenished.
    To test the effect, Kodama's team and researchers at Tokyo and Osaka Universities dragged a large steel plate drilled with holes capable of releasing microbubbles along a 400-metre test tank. They even modified two ships to release bubbles from slots near the bow - a 6000-tonne cargo ship and a 10,000-tonne cement carrier. However, in sea trials Kodama saw a net drop in drag of only 3 per cent. With scale models, researchers at MARIN found reductions of less than 10 per cent.
    These figures are nowhere near as great as theory and early tests might suggest. It seems there are all sorts of complications with applying microbubbles to real ships. For instance, there is a trade-off between the energy used to generate the bubbles and the energy saved by deploying them. Then you have to ensure that no bubbles reach the propeller. Propellers churning through air-filled water lack bite, and lose thrust. There are also many unknowns, such as where to locate the bubble ejectors, what bubble size and hull shape make best use of the effect, and crucially, how riding a carpet of air affects a ship's manoeuvrability and seaworthiness.
    Some problems are easily solved. Special deflectors or careful design of the rear of the hull, for instance, will ensure bubbles don't reach the propellers. Others issues are still under investigation. When the cement carrier was rigged for tests early last year, for example, the slots emitting the bubbles were placed on either side of the bow. But the bubbles did not stay under the ship. And in other experiments the bubble carpet was effective for less than 50 metres downstream of injection. The vessel has been contracted for further experiments in 2007. This time, Kodama says, the team will inject air under the hull at two or three places along its length.
    The good news is that there appears to be little problem with seaworthiness. In fact, according to the researchers in Japan and a series of experiments using models at MARIN, in most sea conditions, microbubbles either make ships more stable or have little effect.
    But one problem seems intractable - microbubbles are only effective at relatively low speeds. "The higher the flow speed," says Kodama, "the greater the magnitude of turbulence. And that turbulence tends to drive the bubbles away from the hull." If they move further than a centimetre or so from the ship, all drag reduction is lost.
    That's a major problem for the US navy, which not only wants good fuel efficiency, but also high speed. In 2000, the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) began a programme to halve friction drag. Only this level of improvement, its researchers argued, could give meaningful increases in speed.
    Instead of full-scale ship trials, DARPA is focusing on developing numerical models and computer simulations that will reveal how drag can be cut. Two teams are competing to produce the models, one at Stanford University in California and the other led by researchers from defence contractors General Dynamics. The results of these models are being validated by large-scale experiments at a huge US navy water-tunnel facility in Memphis, Tennessee, by a third team led by engineer Steve Ceccio at the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor. This tank is capable of testing sections of ships 3 metres across, in flows of more than 35 knots.
    This programme aims to look at microbubbles, but also at the idea of coating hulls with slippery polymers by pumping them out through holes in the side of a vessel. Polymers are used to assist oil flow in the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System, for instance.
    It is still early days, but trials at high flow rates using microbubbles revealed much the same difficulties that the Japanese teams encountered. For the first metre or so downstream from bubble injection "the friction-drag reduction is unbelievable", says Marc Perlin, a researcher in Ceccio's group. "You get to near-zero drag. But then shear forces throw the bubbles out of the boundary layer." This reduces the effect significantly. But, Perlin says, microbubbles could work well for slow-moving tankers. "Here the bubble effect would persist for a long distance."
    At high speeds, polymers seem much more effective. The compounds the team has investigated include polyethylene oxide, which is used to make edible capsules for drugs, and polyacrylamide, which is employed as a flocculant in sewage treatment plants. The polymers probably won't damage the environment, Perlin says, "but the navy isn't keen on polymers because you have to carry them, and that reduces a ship's payload."
    Another form of lubrication is also generating interest. An air film of a few millimetres thick can be formed by pumping air across a super-water-repellent coating on the hull. The air becomes trapped next to the coating in preference to water, helping to reduce the friction between water and hull.
    Yet Perlin and other researchers think that the best solution might come from a concept already explored by Russian engineers: air cavities. Although there has been little comment from DARPA, this idea is clearly under scrutiny at the agency, judging from the title of one of its latest research programmes: Air Cavity Drag Reduction (AirCat).
    Boat in a bubble

    The plan is to look at ways to inject air into large cavities in the side and bottom of a specially designed hull (see Diagram). Air pockets sandwiched between the boat and the water should make a highly effective lubricant. Tests on models show it is possible to create stable cavities that cut drag by a factor of 5. Yet the project aims to reduce hull contact with water by a whopping 80 per cent, and to sustain these air cavities at all speeds and in all sea conditions. An AirCat-equipped ship could use sensors to monitor its air cavities, say, and optimise their shape using motors attached to movable panels.
    The idea of air cavities has much in common with supercavitation, in which a submerged object such as a torpedo creates a single large bubble around itself. This slashes skin friction, bringing remarkable speeds within reach (New Scientist, 22 July 2000, p 26). Perhaps not surprisingly, Russian engineers who first developed supercavitating torpedoes have not only done plenty of research on air-cavity lubrication for ships, but have also put their ideas to work.
    Since the 1980s, Russian shipyards have delivered at least 50 vessels, including patrol boats, ferries and landing craft, that are equipped with cavities in the hull. Pump air into them and they reduce drag by up to 40 per cent, yet require just 3 per cent of the vessel's power to maintain. Most of these craft incorporate a stepped or notched hull to create a V-shaped cavity into which air is pumped. One of the advantages of this technology is that it can be retrofitted by fixing wedge-shaped segments across a hull to create steps. Engineers at the Krylov Shipbuilding Research Institute in St Petersburg say they can build low-speed ships that save up to 20 per cent in fuel, and high-speed ships that save even more. And you can already buy a high-speed motor yacht equipped with this technology.
    But would it be money well spent? MARIN used models to compare air cavities, air films and microbubbles, and found that all resulted in net energy savings. "In our experiment," says Cornel Thill, a senior project manager at MARIN, "microbubbles were the least efficient, saving just a few per cent. The air film was better, and the air cavities performed the best." Thill thinks that this ranking could easily change as research progresses.
    Whatever the details, drag reduction is an idea whose time has come, says Thill. He and his colleagues plan to build an air-lubricated motorised barge by 2009. And the Rotterdam-based DK Group, a company aiming to develop air cavity vessels, is working with Danish naval architects Knud E. Hansen to develop an air-cavity system for cruise liners, tankers and container ships. Eventually it aims to build a high-speed freighter that can cross the Atlantic in two-and-a-half days, about a quarter of the time taken by conventional ships. At that rate, who needs a magic carpet which flies in the air?
    From issue 2539 of New Scientist magazine, 18 February 2006, page 46
    1 person likes this.
  2. marshmat
    Joined: Apr 2005
    Posts: 4,127
    Likes: 147, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 2043
    Location: Ontario

    marshmat Senior Member

    Feasible? Perhaps not just yet.
    Worth investigating further? Definitely!
  3. SailDesign
    Joined: Jan 2003
    Posts: 1,964
    Likes: 96, Points: 58, Legacy Rep: 650
    Location: Jamestown, RI, USA

    SailDesign Old Phart! Stay upwind..

    However, the more air in the water, the less the ambient density (if you see what I mean) of the water, so the more the ship sinks. More boat in the water = more resistance.........
  4. tspeer
    Joined: Feb 2002
    Posts: 2,268
    Likes: 236, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 1673
    Location: Port Gamble, Washington, USA

    tspeer Senior Member

    You might want to look at

    Truong, V.-T., "Drag Reduction Technologies," Defense Science and Technology Organization, DSTO-GD-0290.

    DK Group, "Air cavity ships are ready for a wider market"

    Kodama, et al, "Microbubbles: Drag Reduction and Applicability to Ships," 24th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Fukuoka, Japan, 8 to 12 July 2002, National Academies Press.

    There's been a lot of research on the ability of air cavities or bubbles next to the surface to reduce drag. A key question, though is, "Is the power required to pump the air through the injectors or slots less than the power saved through reducing skin friction of the hull?" It's not enough to reduce drag, there has to be a net reduction in power for the technique to be worthwhile. Otherwise, you'd be better off sending the power to the prop instead of the air pumps.

    And that brings up issues like what volume of air is required to get a given llocal drag reduction, how long do the bubbles or air cavity persist before the air is swept away from the surface, will the technique work on a vertical wall as opposed to a flat bottom, etc. All of which are aimed at getting the most out of the amount of air injected.

    I like Kodama's assessment, "Microbubbles can be called 'a big child -- immature, but with a bright future.'"
  5. alpamis34
    Joined: Jul 2006
    Posts: 63
    Likes: 0, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 2
    Location: A city that never sleeps-Istanbul

    alpamis34 Senior Member

    The point that I could not get is how come the ship does not immerse more due to the low density of air ?
    Joined: Oct 2002
    Posts: 4,519
    Likes: 109, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 1009
    Location: Conn in summers , Ortona FL in winter , with big d

    FAST FRED Senior Member

    A problem not covered is the huge reinforcing that might be necessary of the ship hull.

    A tanker or similar ship MUST run at a lower than "hull speed" as it requires a midship wavew to support the hull.

    No midship wave , the hull will crack in half underway.

  7. Verytricky
    Joined: Oct 2005
    Posts: 248
    Likes: 17, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 400
    Location: London

    Verytricky Large Member

    When I way young my brother used to play games 'sinking' toy ships in his 'Bermuda Triangle' experiments. ( similar to the who shot Kenedy experiments.. )

    He released a fine spray of bubbles under the toy ships, and they sank. Like a stone!

    The air/water mix could not support the weight of the boat.....

    This is obviously different in a planning hull, but this is a displacement craft.
  8. kach22i
    Joined: Feb 2005
    Posts: 2,398
    Likes: 106, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 1222
    Location: Michigan

    kach22i Architect

    The concept is very old, mid 1700's from a source other than the one listed below.
  9. ted655
    Joined: May 2003
    Posts: 640
    Likes: 14, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 122
    Location: Butte La Rose, LA.

    ted655 Senior Member

    Air is anti displacenent. Safety will suffer. Present day psyics won't allow it. You will have to wait for the goverment to make their antigravity mahine available to the public.
  10. stonebreaker
    Joined: May 2006
    Posts: 438
    Likes: 11, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 42
    Location: Shiloh, IL

    stonebreaker Senior Member

    The ship only sinks the thickness of the bubble layer. The bubbles are worth it, or potentially worth it, because they have the ability to act as a lubricant. You know the engine oil ads that talk about engine oil acting as a layer of "tiny ball bearings"? Same thing here - the added drag from the slightly greater draft is more than offset by the lubricating qualities of the air bubbles.

    The captive air pocket hull appears to me to be sort of a planing hull that, instead of rising up out of the water on plane, instead pushes the water down; but essentially accomplishes the same thing as a planing hull - reducing wetted surface.
  11. Verytricky
    Joined: Oct 2005
    Posts: 248
    Likes: 17, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 400
    Location: London

    Verytricky Large Member

    But then they add a new layer of bubbles?
  12. kach22i
    Joined: Feb 2005
    Posts: 2,398
    Likes: 106, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 1222
    Location: Michigan

    kach22i Architect

    Looks like history does repeat. About 100 feet long, not bad.
    They are claiming it's amphibious too?

    From memory, might be another design, can't remember - getting old.:p

    Attached Files:

  13. Verytricky
    Joined: Oct 2005
    Posts: 248
    Likes: 17, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 400
    Location: London

    Verytricky Large Member

    A ventilated stepped planning hull.

    Very different from a displacement hull. Very completely different in fact.
  14. kach22i
    Joined: Feb 2005
    Posts: 2,398
    Likes: 106, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 1222
    Location: Michigan

    kach22i Architect

    In the first case the large ship loses displacement at the sides, not the bottom, and most people here see a problem with that.

    In the second case I sketched up the hull also loses displacement, this time at the bottom and not the sides.

    In each case there is a slim operational safety net which is defined by speed and displacement. As long as you stay within this safety envelope you will be alright, right?

  15. yipster
    Joined: Oct 2002
    Posts: 3,486
    Likes: 95, Points: 58, Legacy Rep: 1148
    Location: netherlands

    yipster designer

    a -more fwd intake- ventilated stepped hull ive seen pics about also
    nasa is testing jet wings sucking turbulent areas to the engine
    was googling for tailored hulls but have to dig in deeper
Forum posts represent the experience, opinion, and view of individual users. Boat Design Net does not necessarily endorse nor share the view of each individual post.
When making potentially dangerous or financial decisions, always employ and consult appropriate professionals. Your circumstances or experience may be different.