Flat Bottom Jet Tunnel

Discussion in 'Boat Design' started by dick stave, Apr 9, 2006.

  1. dick stave
    Joined: Dec 2004
    Posts: 144
    Likes: 1, Points: 18, Legacy Rep: 12
    Location: MISSION B.C. CANADA

    dick stave Senior Member

    I am getting ready to make an engine swap on my skiff.The boat in question is 14 ft. loa,60" wide 3/16 "bottom,78"beam ,1/8"sides all welded 5052 by myself "texas dory" style flat bottom.I am currently running a 30 hp. 2 stroke long shaft yamaha on a 5" setback manual jackplate ,aluminum doel fin setup.I have had really good success with this configuration,the engine is elevated approx. 4.5" and cavitates very little with a stock 12 pitch 3 blade aluminum prop.I run the boat in some real skinny water but I cant get everywhere I want to get in the river so I bought a new yamaha 40 hp. powerhead "30 jet drive" 4 stroke. My concept is to mount the new motor on a 5" setback plate, elevate it 2"-2.5" to get the intake foot slightly above the bottom and use the compression wave off the back to supply clean water to the foot .Im planning to fabricate a "step tunnel" if you will that will mount 2.5" above the bottom at the transom back to the leading edge of the intake with side skirts to channel the flow and feed the pump.I have done an exhaustive search online on this subject, and im well aware of the pitfalls of flat bottoms and jet pumps due to ingested air and cavitation.I still think it can be done in the pursuit of the ultimate shallow drafting/running riverboat.
    I look forward to your ideas and suggestions.
     
  2. dick stave
    Joined: Dec 2004
    Posts: 144
    Likes: 1, Points: 18, Legacy Rep: 12
    Location: MISSION B.C. CANADA

    dick stave Senior Member

    hmm. this idea must be right on....or way off
     
  3. marshmat
    Joined: Apr 2005
    Posts: 4,127
    Likes: 149, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 2043
    Location: Ontario

    marshmat Senior Member

    Well, you could try it... it's very hard to say how well it will work, though, if it will work at all. The 'step tunnel' sounds like it will introduce a lot of turbulence; steps are usually intended to bring air in, and if you try to feed a jet pump with a turbulent aerated stream, the pump won't like you very much. Have you tried running with just the Yamaha jet on the jackplate, no fancy accessories? It might work better than expected in as-is condition.
     
  4. Corpus Skipper
    Joined: Oct 2003
    Posts: 606
    Likes: 8, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 173
    Location: Corpus Christi TX

    Corpus Skipper Hopeless Boataholic

    I'd have to agree with Marsh. Commercial fishermen in the back bays around here run flat bottom Vannoy skiffs with jets in some obscenely skinny water.
     

  5. dick stave
    Joined: Dec 2004
    Posts: 144
    Likes: 1, Points: 18, Legacy Rep: 12
    Location: MISSION B.C. CANADA

    dick stave Senior Member

    Thanks for your replys Marshmat and Corpus Skipper.Good call on mounting up the motor on the jack plate and trying that first K.I.S.S. approach sometimes works best.I had another idea though, what about a "surf board"pad with a slight vee about36" long and 12" wide transitioning to a proper jet tunnel aft and mounting the motor directly to the transom.Kind of the opposite of a delta pad on a vee bottom inboard jet.It wouldnt have to hang below the rub rails with about 6 degree deadrise,and would split off the air bubbles carried aft .I will try your suggestion first ... even though im itching to break out the skill saw and go to work on the bottom(trying new ideas is where its at for me)Next project 17 ft.,66" bottom ,tunneled 200 optimax sportjet !
     
Loading...
Forum posts represent the experience, opinion, and view of individual users. Boat Design Net does not necessarily endorse nor share the view of each individual post.
When making potentially dangerous or financial decisions, always employ and consult appropriate professionals. Your circumstances or experience may be different.