Stability of small trawlers

Discussion in 'Stability' started by tranmkp, Feb 18, 2009.

  1. tranmkp
    Joined: May 2002
    Posts: 97
    Likes: 2, Points: 8, Legacy Rep: 78
    Location: Texas

    tranmkp "wherever you go. there you are"

    Please help me understand: a small trawler, with full keel, mostly there for tracking and to house the shaft I suppose.

    Would would be the effect of adding ballast inside the keel area? Would it modify the boats roll characteristics? Or would it just make is slower?
  2. TollyWally
    Joined: Mar 2005
    Posts: 774
    Likes: 26, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 423
    Location: Fox Island

    TollyWally Senior Member

    I would imagine that the speed issue would revolve around whether or not it is a displacement hull if the weight is kept within reason. The roll charactoristic will probably speed up with more of a snap. Possibly less comfortable but able to stand up to harsher conditions. My .02, others will chime in with perhaps more qualified opinions
  3. Ike
    Joined: Apr 2006
    Posts: 2,461
    Likes: 325, Points: 83, Legacy Rep: 1669
    Location: Washington

    Ike Senior Member

    Well, it depends. On some it is just there to help the boat track straight and protect the hull and prop. On others they actually do put ballast in the keel to iincrease stability. Of course as Tolly said that shortens the roll period and gives it more of a snap. It all depends on the intended use of the trawler and the area where it will be used. If the area has bad weather and seas much of the time then stability becomes really crucial. The maybe a little ballast may help.
  4. Guillermo
    Joined: Mar 2005
    Posts: 3,644
    Likes: 188, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 2247
    Location: Pontevedra, Spain

    Guillermo Ingeniero Naval

    Adding ballast in the keel will certainly increase initial stability but may be detrimental to stability at big angles of heel (ultimate stability), if it significantly diminish freeboard. Every boat is a case.

  5. MikeJohns
    Joined: Aug 2004
    Posts: 3,192
    Likes: 208, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 2054
    Location: Australia

    MikeJohns Senior Member

    Often people ballast fishing boats thinking that by adding stability they will make it more comfortable.
    The resultant increase in GM usually makes the roll far more violent and the boat feels even more unstable.
    It is ironic that as the roll becomes more gentle and even 'lazy' in its response to waves the vessel is approaching a dangerous level of instability, this is counter intuitive to many people who confuse comfortable motion with stability.

  6. tranmkp
    Joined: May 2002
    Posts: 97
    Likes: 2, Points: 8, Legacy Rep: 78
    Location: Texas

    tranmkp "wherever you go. there you are"

    This is all good info...
  7. Highlanderwj
    Joined: Mar 2009
    Posts: 4
    Likes: 0, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 10
    Location: Milford CT

    Highlanderwj New Member

    My experience- in the gulf of Maine 8-10 ft seas, the boat was rolling too slowly or hanging there at the end of the roll. Very scary. So - the water tanks are above the water line and I pumped them out as fast as possible.
    Much better! A little snap roll is way better than a terminal swim.


  8. jehardiman
    Joined: Aug 2004
    Posts: 2,871
    Likes: 419, Points: 83, Legacy Rep: 2040
    Location: Port Orchard, Washington, USA

    jehardiman Senior Member

    As Guillermo and Mike Johns said, it really is dependant on the current stability and hull shape and without some data is almost impossible to know the true answer.

    FWIW, here is the problem:

    GM is the distance between the Vertical CG (called KG for "Keel to CG") and the apparent point of rotation of the vessel, the Metacenter (KM for "Keel to Metacenter"), so GM = KM - KG. The righting moment just as the vessel starts to roll is the sine of the roll angle * GM * displacement. So you can see that the larger the GM, the more the vessel wants to return upright. If GM is too large, the vessel is jerky in roll, if GM is too small, it doesn't want to roll back upright.

    The real issue with adding weight to manipulate GM is in how KM relates to KG. KM is actually the sum of two factors: KB, the vertical distance from the keel to the center of buoyancy and BM which is the distance from the center of buoyancy to the Metacenter. BM is calculated by Ixx/V where Ixx is the inertia of the waterplane and V is the displacement of the hull in volume. (for a full discussion of all the math in this go here and ignore my snide comments in that thread). When we add ballast low a number of things happen. KG decreases, KB increases, V increases, and Ixx can either increase or not depending on hull shape. Depending on the interplay between those factors, GM could increase, could decrease, or could remain the same.

    So in answer to your original question, tranmkp, adding weight will change your roll period, but right now there is not enough information to say wether it will make it "better" or worse.
    Last edited: Mar 26, 2009
Forum posts represent the experience, opinion, and view of individual users. Boat Design Net does not necessarily endorse nor share the view of each individual post.
When making potentially dangerous or financial decisions, always employ and consult appropriate professionals. Your circumstances or experience may be different.