I wonder why ?
3d packages do 2d as well as 2d only does - unless its something crazy like Sketchup
No, most 3D packages including high end stuff like Pro-E and SolidWorks actually are not good drafters!. They generate the 2D information quickly but are not as good at generating a clear 2D production drawing IMHO. You get reasonable professional results in a reasonable time and yes it is quick if you change the 3D model etc, ie parametric updating etc. Something like Autocad LT is a better 2D drafter than say Rhino and can achieve better results. Rhino is a good 3D surface modeller with 2d added on.
I use something like that, a professional, supported product but faster!. Each to their own preference. Try a rail carriage in 2D with almost every component bar the bogies and wheels - takes 3-4 times longer to just load the drawing in LT.... longer still in other packages....

Yes, I timed it for reference. Plus the livery drawings all plotted 25:1 (A0) in full colour, with carriage names on etc.
At the time refurbing a car was 1/3rd the cost of building new.
It is way quicker than Rhino for drafting so that is my choice. As long as I can get the info across packages with no loss, or very little loss (maybe Dimensional Styles? - what a waste of time as a concept), no problem.
I'll own up, I've never used Sketchup, but have imported the files into Rhino from clients and had to recreate NURBS models etc. But the OP could use something like Intellicad, or even though I don't like it much Turbocad. but forget the 3D version!.
TANSL is right, unless you can generate G code, have CAM software where you can generate the cutter path and preview etc most 2D packages have enough tools to get a useable file to the CNC. Rhino is very good as you have such fine control of the polyline/arc segments, it always has had great translators.