Small trimarans under 20'

Discussion in 'Multihulls' started by Doug Lord, Jun 24, 2012.

  1. outside the box

    outside the box Previous Member

    Chriz

    Very nice, thank you for sharing the information.

    New Zealand would benefit from having a class like your boat has in Europe.

    Brooke and team Ezifold

     
  2. Doug Lord
    Joined: May 2009
    Posts: 16,679
    Likes: 349, Points: 93, Legacy Rep: 1362
    Location: Cocoa, Florida

    Doug Lord Flight Ready

    Chryz10

    =================
    Chriz, thanks for the detail! Good luck with your testing.......
     
  3. oldsailor7
    Joined: May 2008
    Posts: 2,097
    Likes: 44, Points: 48, Legacy Rep: 436
    Location: Sydney Australia

    oldsailor7 Senior Member

    For ease of building, low cost and good performance I don't think you can go past the 5M Piver "Frolic". Plans are still available. :D
     
  4. Cholsson
    Joined: Aug 2015
    Posts: 93
    Likes: 29, Points: 18, Legacy Rep: 14
    Location: Gothenburg

    Cholsson Junior Member

  5. Doug Lord
    Joined: May 2009
    Posts: 16,679
    Likes: 349, Points: 93, Legacy Rep: 1362
    Location: Cocoa, Florida

    Doug Lord Flight Ready

    Chris, the more I see it ,the more I like. You've done a great job!
     
  6. Cholsson
    Joined: Aug 2015
    Posts: 93
    Likes: 29, Points: 18, Legacy Rep: 14
    Location: Gothenburg

    Cholsson Junior Member

  7. Doug Lord
    Joined: May 2009
    Posts: 16,679
    Likes: 349, Points: 93, Legacy Rep: 1362
    Location: Cocoa, Florida

    Doug Lord Flight Ready

    Exocet 19 Foiling Trimaran

    I've been watching for news about the Exocet Xtrem 19 foiling trimaran for over a year now and just found that the company says it will be launched before the end of the year: https://www.facebook.com/Trimaran-Exocet-XTREM-19-1460018077613973/
    This may be the first fullsize trimaran under 20' equipped with UptiP foils on the amas:

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  8. Cholsson
    Joined: Aug 2015
    Posts: 93
    Likes: 29, Points: 18, Legacy Rep: 14
    Location: Gothenburg

    Cholsson Junior Member

  9. rcnesneg
    Joined: Sep 2013
    Posts: 456
    Likes: 6, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 58
    Location: Utah

    rcnesneg Senior Member

  10. Doug Lord
    Joined: May 2009
    Posts: 16,679
    Likes: 349, Points: 93, Legacy Rep: 1362
    Location: Cocoa, Florida

    Doug Lord Flight Ready

    The way they were able to keep it level, I'd think she'd be a great candidate for a lifting foil on the daggerboard and a rudder t-foil. Man, that would be somethin'......
     
  11. upchurchmr
    Joined: Feb 2011
    Posts: 3,287
    Likes: 259, Points: 83, Legacy Rep: 579
    Location: Ft. Worth, Tx, USA

    upchurchmr Senior Member

    Looks to me like it was a very fast and competent ride in wind which all the new designs never show us.

    If they put more float on they really would need more sail.
    Looks like they are able to keep it almost flat even in 20 to 30kts of wind.

    Actually the comment probably should be about the real skill those sailors have.

    Where can I get a set of plans???
     
  12. Corley
    Joined: Oct 2009
    Posts: 3,781
    Likes: 196, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 826
    Location: Melbourne, Australia

    Corley epoxy coated

    The Akila seems like an interesting boat. I'm not sold on the hiking racks with trapeze which just seems a waste. If they can keep the boat on its feet in that kind of wind with only the crew on trapeze the racks just equal something else to drag through the water they may as well trapeze from the float. Float buoyancy looks pretty reasonable and beam clearance seems adequate.
     
  13. upchurchmr
    Joined: Feb 2011
    Posts: 3,287
    Likes: 259, Points: 83, Legacy Rep: 579
    Location: Ft. Worth, Tx, USA

    upchurchmr Senior Member

    They got 3 more feet of beam with the racks.
    When you watch an ama go under the rack stayed out of the water.
    That time of course. The next time it might go the way you say. But that is what Crowther advocated wasn't it?
     
  14. Corley
    Joined: Oct 2009
    Posts: 3,781
    Likes: 196, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 826
    Location: Melbourne, Australia

    Corley epoxy coated

    Yes I can see the extra beam argument but they have twin traps and the helm isn't even hiking the rack just seems like parasitic weight when they clearly have plenty of righting moment in what are pretty strong conditions. I don't know much about the design if it was intended to be sailed solo then the rack could make sense. Perhaps I just feel like having a nitpick and prefer the aesthetic of a clean float beam junction :)
     

  15. oldsailor7
    Joined: May 2008
    Posts: 2,097
    Likes: 44, Points: 48, Legacy Rep: 436
    Location: Sydney Australia

    oldsailor7 Senior Member

    I agree with Corley.
    It is more important in a fast boat to reduce ALL types of drag above the waterline, and this includes minimum topside area, rounded decks and no extra air drag items such as shelves, racks, boxy cubbies etc:
    Weight to windward--OK. A standing crew member--Not.
    A crew member standing on the windward hull provides up to 12 sq ft of flat plate air drag, for instance.
    I used to have my crew lay down on the deck of the windward hull or ama, at any time when we were racing in strong winds. It really paid off. :cool:
     
Loading...
Forum posts represent the experience, opinion, and view of individual users. Boat Design Net does not necessarily endorse nor share the view of each individual post.
When making potentially dangerous or financial decisions, always employ and consult appropriate professionals. Your circumstances or experience may be different.