Random Picture Thread

Discussion in 'All Things Boats & Boating' started by kach22i, Mar 30, 2006.

  1. hoytedow
    Joined: Sep 2009
    Posts: 5,769
    Likes: 350, Points: 93, Legacy Rep: 2489
    Location: The Land of Lost Content

    hoytedow Fly on the Wall - Miss ddt yet?

    I looked at the region on Google Earth. It seems to be large, possibly multi-dwelling buildings and commercial property or parks from what I can discern.
     
  2. Tiny Turnip
    Joined: Mar 2008
    Posts: 762
    Likes: 196, Points: 43, Legacy Rep: 743
    Location: Huddersfield, UK

    Tiny Turnip Senior Member

    My friends lived in this tiny house (link below) at the junction of Pilgrim Street and Mount Street, Liverpool, a long time ago. See attached picture, and from Google Street View:

    https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@53.4...4!1sxQrgG9N3P2R99XNSvT06_g!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

    I can't get the attachment loader to fire up at the moment - I'll attach a screen shot when I can, but the link above should take you right there. [edit: picture attachment successfully uploaded now]

    The house was built onto a small strip of land at the end of a terrace. To be clear, it runs from the corner (the right hand edge of the 'Mount Street' plaque) to the black painted drainpipe to the left, an external distance of 8 feet, 2.4 metres. The internal dimension is some 7 feet.


    Given these constraints, it seems remarkable that the stair, complete with a notional landing at top and bottom, runs within this short dimension, from the front door behind the battered 'no entry' sign. It is nearly a ladder.


    AND... The smallest house in Britain, on the seafront at Conwy, North Wales:

    [​IMG]

    from https://schetzelsintheuk.wordpress.com/2013/02/

    There's a decent pub just along the front - a lovely place for a beer on a mild evening.


    https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@53.2...qGdOMdKgN2LkilWy-A!2e0!7i13312!8i6656!6m1!1e1


    If you swivel the street view around, you can see some boats, too! :)
     

    Attached Files:

  3. Tiny Turnip
    Joined: Mar 2008
    Posts: 762
    Likes: 196, Points: 43, Legacy Rep: 743
    Location: Huddersfield, UK

    Tiny Turnip Senior Member

    there's something interesting going on at the left of the photo, half way up. It might possibly be older battlements from some sort of fortification,which have subsequently been incorporated into an outhouse, or a series of primitive chimneys? :confused: (a fish smokery?) I can't see why so many chimneys over one large one though, so I'd go with the fortification. It looks to be a different and rougher construction than the rest of the buildings - possibly stone rather than brick.
     
  4. Tiny Turnip
    Joined: Mar 2008
    Posts: 762
    Likes: 196, Points: 43, Legacy Rep: 743
    Location: Huddersfield, UK

    Tiny Turnip Senior Member

  5. Tiny Turnip
    Joined: Mar 2008
    Posts: 762
    Likes: 196, Points: 43, Legacy Rep: 743
    Location: Huddersfield, UK

    Tiny Turnip Senior Member

    Last edited: Jan 13, 2016
  6. Tiny Turnip
    Joined: Mar 2008
    Posts: 762
    Likes: 196, Points: 43, Legacy Rep: 743
    Location: Huddersfield, UK

    Tiny Turnip Senior Member

    The same houses as the original photograph, in an etching from the Illustrated London News, via
    http://partleton.co.uk/George1851in1871.htm

    [​IMG]

    The houses were knocked down in 1866 onwards, to make way for the Albert Embankment, designed to alleviate floodling. The Parleton website gives a great deal of background to this
     
  7. SamSam
    Joined: Feb 2005
    Posts: 3,900
    Likes: 197, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 971
    Location: Coastal Georgia

    SamSam Senior Member

    That's not quite the smell I was imagining.
     
  8. SamSam
    Joined: Feb 2005
    Posts: 3,900
    Likes: 197, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 971
    Location: Coastal Georgia

    SamSam Senior Member

    Those are the same houses from the same vantage point. Amazing! There must have been a bridge that the artist and photographer worked from, or the artist used the photo to make the drawing.
     
  9. Tiny Turnip
    Joined: Mar 2008
    Posts: 762
    Likes: 196, Points: 43, Legacy Rep: 743
    Location: Huddersfield, UK

    Tiny Turnip Senior Member

    Its fascinating, isn't it? The photo was c1850-55, and the etching is, as best as I can read, November 22nd 1867, so its completely possible the illustrator was working from the photo.

    Lambeth bridge opened in 1862, so it was in place at the time of the etching, but not the photo.

    The piles for the Albert Embankment were evident in the c1865 photo I linked to, so perhaps the etching was done from the embankement structure shortly before the houses were demolished?

    You can see the Vauxhall bridge in the background of the etching.

    The dates would suggest that the photograph was taken from a boat, though as there was no structure in place at that time. I bet you're right and the etching was an artistic interpretation from the photo
     
  10. Tiny Turnip
    Joined: Mar 2008
    Posts: 762
    Likes: 196, Points: 43, Legacy Rep: 743
    Location: Huddersfield, UK

    Tiny Turnip Senior Member

  11. SukiSolo
    Joined: Dec 2012
    Posts: 1,270
    Likes: 25, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 271
    Location: Hampshire UK

    SukiSolo Senior Member

    I used to work in a building approximately the same age - 1862 onwards down on Wapping Wall. It's still there, though a tad expensive, a two bed flat is more rent per calendar month than our rent per annum 20 odd years ago...
    We had a studio on the top floor and had to keep the drawing boards away from the drips coming through the roof......;)

    At least 'The Prospect of Whitby' was close..

    http://www.victorianweb.org/art/architecture/industrial/8.html
     
  12. hoytedow
    Joined: Sep 2009
    Posts: 5,769
    Likes: 350, Points: 93, Legacy Rep: 2489
    Location: The Land of Lost Content

    hoytedow Fly on the Wall - Miss ddt yet?

    Real estate value is high. "Legoland" is on or very near the spot.
     
  13. RHP
    Joined: Nov 2005
    Posts: 835
    Likes: 85, Points: 28, Legacy Rep: 1183
    Location: Singapore

    RHP Senior Member

    [​IMG]

    The five of total six built 'Heavy Submarine Cruisers' (as they were called in Russian) AKULA Class submarines (Typhoon Class in Nato), the largest and possibly most dangerous submarines ever made, at their base on the Kola peninsula. With the break up of the USSR Russia found it could not support this class and quickly mothballed the subs before dismantling. The sixth is still sailing however due for decommissioning in 2016. Good riddance. The USS Seawolf (SSN-21) class were built by the US in response to this class but were quickly scaled back to just three subs when it became apparant the Akula class was no longer a threat. They were replaced by the smaller Virginia-class (SSN-774) submarines, which were expected to be about 10% cheaper.
     
  14. Jolly Amaranto
    Joined: Jan 2012
    Posts: 54
    Likes: 19, Points: 18, Legacy Rep: 207
    Location: Texas

    Jolly Amaranto Junior Member

    From the Library of Congress Collection. WWII Farm Security Administration/Office of War Information Color Photographs.

    [​IMG]
     

    Attached Files:


  15. Rurudyne
    Joined: Mar 2014
    Posts: 1,170
    Likes: 40, Points: 48, Legacy Rep: 155
    Location: North Texas

    Rurudyne Senior Member

    Ah, the old do you have a Prince Albert in a can joke....
     
Loading...
Forum posts represent the experience, opinion, and view of individual users. Boat Design Net does not necessarily endorse nor share the view of each individual post.
When making potentially dangerous or financial decisions, always employ and consult appropriate professionals. Your circumstances or experience may be different.