Prop walk

Discussion in 'Hydrodynamics and Aerodynamics' started by JordieS, Oct 8, 2011.

  1. Frosty

    Frosty Previous Member

    I always understood it like this. At the top of any prop is a flat plate if its an outboard or the bottom of the hull if its a normal drive. There is some thrust radiating out from the prop and when it squeezed between the vavitation plate or hull it has to go somewhere else so it goes to the side of continuing rotation. Hence prop walk changes with prop rotation.

    So we can say from that that the closer is the prop is to the hull the more prop walk you will get.

    Similarly the small plate of the ouitboards results in less walk than the conventional.

    I agree entirely with Sub tom --dont fight it, use it.
     
  2. cyclops2
    Joined: Sep 2010
    Posts: 242
    Likes: 8, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 94
    Location: New Jersy

    cyclops2 Senior Member

    The unequal fanning out of the water from the prop is VERY noticeable on my overpowered Chaparrel 186 SSI with a 5 L Mercruiser.

    Results.
    Foward slams the bow left against the dock.
    Reverse shoves the stern against the dock. AND at the same time is pulling the bow away from the dock. Impossible for me to dock alone with the wrong wind direction.
    Rudder is almost useless in reverse.

    Only way to dock in a breeze is with a cellphone calling someone down to the dock. There is only 12" between our boats.

    Have to get everything perfect going to the dock in foward ONLY.
     
  3. daiquiri
    Joined: May 2004
    Posts: 5,371
    Likes: 258, Points: 93, Legacy Rep: 3380
    Location: Italy (Garda Lake) and Croatia (Istria)

    daiquiri Engineering and Design

    Gonzo, this is true only in terms of a nearly non-measurable difference. Water is, for all practical uses related to ship resistance and propulsors, nearly incompressible - meaning that it requires a really huge pressure to compress a given volume of water even by a very small amount.

    To give you an order of magnitude of the pressures invloved, it requires a pressure differential of 215 atm to cause an increase of water density by just 1%.
    By knowing this, you can understand that the pressure difference acting between the top and the bottom of any prop is simply too small to cause any measurable difference in density between the two points.

    The only time the density can be accounted for is when dealing with aerated water. If there is a significant difference between the amount of dissolved air between the top and bottom blades, then the densities will be different at the two points and the top blades (where there's more air and hence the mixture is less dense) will experience a loss of both thrust and drag.
    But the facts is - a prop walk occurs even when water is not aerated, so it certainly cannot be the main source of the problem.

    To your defence, I can tell that even respectable authors sometimes stumble and fall on the same issue. Dave Gerr, for example, in his "Propeller Handbook" says (page 20):
    "The reason (for prop walk) - in simple terms - is that the water at the bottom of the propeller is a bit denser and freer to flow (there is no hull above it) than at the top of the propeller."​

    Cheers.
     
  4. Jimboat
    Joined: Feb 2002
    Posts: 267
    Likes: 22, Points: 18, Legacy Rep: 130
    Location: Canada

    Jimboat Senior Member

    Prop Walk is normally realized primarily with surfacing propellers.

    Agreed!
     
  5. Frosty

    Frosty Previous Member

    ALL props have prop walk.
     
  6. Submarine Tom

    Submarine Tom Previous Member

    Ya, Ya, but does anyone ever pick-up after them...?

    -Tom
     

  7. Jimboat
    Joined: Feb 2002
    Posts: 267
    Likes: 22, Points: 18, Legacy Rep: 130
    Location: Canada

    Jimboat Senior Member

Loading...
Similar Threads
  1. Simme_swede
    Replies:
    10
    Views:
    443
  2. Toepfer Marine
    Replies:
    5
    Views:
    1,693
  3. vaggelis
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    813
  4. MacktheYounger
    Replies:
    155
    Views:
    9,249
  5. Ricky Larsen
    Replies:
    10
    Views:
    1,475
  6. Surfer Naval Architect
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    1,141
  7. KeithO
    Replies:
    6
    Views:
    2,334
  8. Surfer Naval Architect
    Replies:
    4
    Views:
    1,552
  9. feunatz
    Replies:
    21
    Views:
    3,629
  10. sandhammaren05
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    1,656
Forum posts represent the experience, opinion, and view of individual users. Boat Design Net does not necessarily endorse nor share the view of each individual post.
When making potentially dangerous or financial decisions, always employ and consult appropriate professionals. Your circumstances or experience may be different.