Power/Speed/Displacement Calculation

Discussion in 'Boat Design' started by NB Willawaw, Dec 23, 2005.

  1. NB Willawaw
    Joined: Dec 2005
    Posts: 8
    Likes: 0, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 10
    Location: UK

    NB Willawaw Junior Member

    I am involved with a new boat design which has the following underwater/under waterline criteria:

    Bow: Triangular Section 3.50m long x 2.08m beam x 0.66m draft
    Mid: Rectangular Section 10.31m long x 2.08m beam x 0.66m draft
    Stern: Triangular Section 2.90m long x 2.08m beam x 0.66m draft

    I estimate this corresponds to a displacement of 18.5 metric tonnes approx in fresh water (boat will only be used in fresh water).

    How do I calculate the power that will be needed to drive this hull at 6mph ignoring wind and tide ?

    Can anybody help me with some formulas please ??

    Mark
     
  2. gonzo
    Joined: Aug 2002
    Posts: 16,790
    Likes: 1,714, Points: 123, Legacy Rep: 2031
    Location: Milwaukee, WI

    gonzo Senior Member

    First of all, the displacement doesn't change from fresh to salt water, or out of the water.
    Calculations are for speed on the water, tides go up and down anyway.
    With triangular sections, the wave making is going to absorb enourmous amount of power and make the boat difficult to handle. Is there a reason to not streamline the hull?
     
  3. NB Willawaw
    Joined: Dec 2005
    Posts: 8
    Likes: 0, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 10
    Location: UK

    NB Willawaw Junior Member

    Not convinced about the first. Draft will vary slightly due to salinity therefore displacement must also vary slightly. Its irrelevant really as thats not my question and the boat will only be used on fresh water.

    Tides do go up and down, but in confined spaces like estuaries, you get flow. We have a 4-6 Knot flow in the River Thames caused by spring tides.

    The boat doesnt have triangular sections - it is streamlined.
    I have calculated the shape as a combination of simple shapes i.e rectangle and triangles to simplify the maths.

    Do you know the answer to the question ?

     
  4. Guillermo
    Joined: Mar 2005
    Posts: 3,644
    Likes: 189, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 2247
    Location: Pontevedra, Spain

    Guillermo Ingeniero Naval

    Well, it depends on what you understand as 'displacement'. Most usual assumption for displacement is the weight of the boat, so it's irrelevant where the boat is floating, fresh water, salt water or melted lead. But if you mean submerged volume, then yes, it varies.

    Regarding your question, a quick estimative suggests an engine power not in excess of 50 HP, but to be more accurate Lwl and Cp are needed.
     
  5. Robjl
    Joined: Nov 2005
    Posts: 116
    Likes: 0, Points: 16, Legacy Rep: 10
    Location: Adelaide

    Robjl Senior Member

    speed through the water???

    In your first post you state;
    ".......needed to drive this hull at 6mph ignoring wind and tide ?"
    In your second;
    "Tides do go up and down, but in confined spaces like estuaries, you get flow. We have a 4-6 Knot flow in the River Thames caused by spring tides."
    I'm not sure what speed you need to make?
    Is it a flat 6mph or is it 6mph into a 6 knot flow?
    There is a lot of difference!
    I'm guessing about a 16m waterline, is this correct?

    My estimate for power needed;
    20Hp continuous to do 6 knots in flat water
    120Hp cont to do 11 knots in flat water
    My suggestion;
    I agree with the 50hp but....
    if the tide turns... drop anchor.

    Displacement is the weight of water displaced by the boat, the density of the water makes no difference. It is a matter of using terminology correctly or as is the norm in this area. Just as we usually refer to speed in knots rather than mph.
    Hope this is useful.
     
  6. terhohalme
    Joined: Jun 2003
    Posts: 512
    Likes: 40, Points: 28, Legacy Rep: 506
    Location: Kotka, Finland

    terhohalme BEng Boat Technology

    For a displacement boat you need approx. 4 kW/metric tonne. At 18 tonnes it makes 72 kW and you can achieve closely 10 knots while your LWL is 16.7 metres. This power includes some reserve against wind and waves.

    For a canal boat halv the power is enough, say 36 kW.

    For future purposes have a basic book of boats like Gerr's Nature of Boats.
     
  7. NB Willawaw
    Joined: Dec 2005
    Posts: 8
    Likes: 0, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 10
    Location: UK

    NB Willawaw Junior Member

    Clarification

    For the purposes of clarification:

    1. Ignore wind and tide. I need the boat to do 6mph on a non-tidal inland waterway - if you need Knots thats 5.2 Knots.

    2. The length/beam dimensions given are at the waterline so LWL is 16.71m

    I would like to understand how the required power is calculated so can somebody actually explain the formula to me please.



     
  8. terhohalme
    Joined: Jun 2003
    Posts: 512
    Likes: 40, Points: 28, Legacy Rep: 506
    Location: Kotka, Finland

    terhohalme BEng Boat Technology

    OK, just for xmas...:)

    While the speed is so low, you can ignore wave making. Friction resistance can be estimated by Froude's friction formula:

    RF=161*(0.00871+ 0.053/(8.8+LWL))*WSA*V^1.825

    where
    RF is friction resistance in Newtons
    LWL is waterline length in metres
    WSA is wetted surface area in square meters
    V is speed in meters/second

    Effective power (Pe) in Watts is

    Pe = V * RF

    Installed power is twice that much (propeller efficiency!).

    Study BOOKS!!! This goup is not a free design office!
     
  9. NB Willawaw
    Joined: Dec 2005
    Posts: 8
    Likes: 0, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 10
    Location: UK

    NB Willawaw Junior Member

    Assistance

    Thanks for your help.

    Firstly, I'm not a naval architect.
    Secondly, this is a hobby not a paid job
    Thirdly, if I could get easy access to the books that provide this information I wouldn't need to ask the question.

    Lastly, if you can't provide assistance to a fellow boater with good cheer, you shouldn't reply.

    Thanks for your help.

    Have a good Christmas.

     
  10. Robjl
    Joined: Nov 2005
    Posts: 116
    Likes: 0, Points: 16, Legacy Rep: 10
    Location: Adelaide

    Robjl Senior Member

    Try this one..

    This spreadsheet is on another thread...can't remember where...but it seems to be accurate.
    Merry Xmas.
     

    Attached Files:

  11. Raggi_Thor
    Joined: Jan 2004
    Posts: 2,457
    Likes: 64, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 711
    Location: Trondheim, NORWAY

    Raggi_Thor Nav.arch/Designer/Builder

    NB, if you read you own postings carefully, you may see that the tone in your writing is a little aggressively demanding, even if that was not your intention. You did get a lot of questions answered, I think :)
     
  12. gonzo
    Joined: Aug 2002
    Posts: 16,790
    Likes: 1,714, Points: 123, Legacy Rep: 2031
    Location: Milwaukee, WI

    gonzo Senior Member

    You can't simplify the math by ignoring the shape of the boat. It will make a significant difference. You are asking a question without giving the proper information and demanding the "right" answer. Post the lines of the hull for a better understanding of your needs.
     

  13. wdnboatbuilder
    Joined: Nov 2005
    Posts: 227
    Likes: 2, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 15
    Location: Cape Coral Fl

    wdnboatbuilder Senior Member

    I would just like to say thank you to all the guru's on this and all forums
    thank you
     
Loading...
Forum posts represent the experience, opinion, and view of individual users. Boat Design Net does not necessarily endorse nor share the view of each individual post.
When making potentially dangerous or financial decisions, always employ and consult appropriate professionals. Your circumstances or experience may be different.