Keel displacement?

Discussion in 'Boat Design' started by LTDboatdesign, Dec 3, 2010.

  1. LTDboatdesign
    Joined: Oct 2010
    Posts: 23
    Likes: 1, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 15
    Location: Bainbridge Island WA

    LTDboatdesign Junior Member

    I am in the process of calculating a the weight of my Keel on a boat I am designing. I got to thinking.... I want the keel to be about 30% of the displacement. But if I was to go with 30% of the hull Displacement(which is what i have calculated). After it was installed I would have less than 30%, due to the added volume of the keel. Because I have design a rather full keel it could add a considerable amount of displacement to the boat.
    I am wondering if keel weight is generally calculated including its own volume of if its just left out? Or maybe i am completely missing something?[

    Thanks for the Help

    Cody
     
  2. alan white
    Joined: Mar 2007
    Posts: 3,730
    Likes: 123, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 1404
    Location: maine

    alan white Senior Member

    You are missing something. The hull including all appendages may be considered an envelope within which certain percentages of the overall weight are distributed unevenly with the keel ballast at the very bottom.
    On average, the hull below the water will weigh the same as sea water with most of the volume being far lighter than water and the ballast (if lead, e.g.) weighing much more than water.
    Therefore create the hull form first with a target displacement (using the midsection area), and then calculate the total weight of the ballast material (usu. lead) at your desired percentage of the total and finally calculate the volume in cu. ft. required to hold lead that weighs 30% of the overall displacement.
    Lead weighs 709 lbs per cubic foot.
     
  3. Perm Stress
    Joined: Sep 2009
    Posts: 554
    Likes: 24, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 323
    Location: Lithuania

    Perm Stress Senior Member

    That 30% you talk about is 30% of total WEIGHT of boat; unless there is close prototype or reasonably detailed weight estimate calculation, all the talk about keel % is really pointless.

    Now, if a boat you design has integral keel like J-class, or Folkboat, R-class, International metre class, Scerry cruiser, or similar, keel volume is included in volume displacement; than required part of keel volume is given over to ballast. And that's all.

    In any case, 30% of ballast mean 30% of weight, irrespective of hull form as such.
     
  4. DCockey
    Joined: Oct 2009
    Posts: 5,229
    Likes: 634, Points: 113, Legacy Rep: 1485
    Location: Midcoast Maine

    DCockey Senior Member

    As Perm Stress mentions, the ratio which is usually considered is the weight of the ballast to the total weight of the boat including the ballast. Total weight of the boat equals the weight of the water displaced by the boat. So include the displacement of the keel.
     
  5. LTDboatdesign
    Joined: Oct 2010
    Posts: 23
    Likes: 1, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 15
    Location: Bainbridge Island WA

    LTDboatdesign Junior Member

    Thanks guys, thats what i suspected, but its good to hear it from someone else, on the downside, my calculations with the keel volume added are now showing a considerably heavier boat. Oh well, won't make that mistake twice.

    Thanks for the Help

    Cody
     

  6. Perm Stress
    Joined: Sep 2009
    Posts: 554
    Likes: 24, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 323
    Location: Lithuania

    Perm Stress Senior Member

    Did you calculate weights?

    hull, rig, deck hardware, interior if any?

    Displacement is determined by weight of all the stuff on-board, not nice lines drawing.
     
Loading...
Forum posts represent the experience, opinion, and view of individual users. Boat Design Net does not necessarily endorse nor share the view of each individual post.
When making potentially dangerous or financial decisions, always employ and consult appropriate professionals. Your circumstances or experience may be different.