Modified Deep V

Discussion in 'Boat Design' started by jfblouin, Feb 13, 2005.

  1. jfblouin
    Joined: Sep 2004
    Posts: 163
    Likes: 1, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 24
    Location: Chandler(Gaspesie) Quebec

    jfblouin Senior Member

    I'm in design step for building a all FRP 6,7m Zodiac look boat.

    You can see one of my study design at
    http://boatdesign.net/forums/showthread.php?t=6375 Deep V

    For now, I'm looking for V design and I have somes questions at can you see at:
    http://boatdesign.net/forums/showthread.php?t=5903 RBB

    Yesterday I found this design

    [​IMG]

    Progression boat said:"Hull type is a modified Deep V

    Progression’s bottom design, starting at the transom keel, has a seven inch pad running forward. Working from the pad to each side, the design incorporates a 24-degree panel, a three inch lifting strake, a 23-degree panel, a three inch lifting strake, and a 22-degree panel ending with a three inch reverse angle chine. (where the side meets the bottom). This is Progression’s unique Variable-Deadrise Bottom. The benefits of a bottom with this geometric design, as opposed to that of a straight V-bottom, is a stronger and stiffer bottom, creating greater lift in the water. All this adds up to softer entries, a dryer ride, greater stability, and higher speeds in rougher water."

    I find this approach interresting for me, but I dont want a high speed boat, only 30-35 knots top speed boat with soft ride and seaworthy.

    What do you think about this design.
     
  2. intrepid71
    Joined: Jan 2005
    Posts: 92
    Likes: 4, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 39
    Location: Connecticut

    intrepid71 Junior Member

    My understanding is that a convex bottom section will produce reduced impact accelerations compared to an equivalent concave section. I would consider the Progression section to be concave, with the higher deadrise inboard and the lower deadrise outboard. I would recommend reversing that if your really want a soft ride.
     
  3. jfblouin
    Joined: Sep 2004
    Posts: 163
    Likes: 1, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 24
    Location: Chandler(Gaspesie) Quebec

    jfblouin Senior Member

    I dont realize that will give a concave section and you have reason. I will calculate a convexe section with the same principle. Thanks a lot. I make a big step forward.
     
  4. ClarkT
    Joined: Jun 2003
    Posts: 108
    Likes: 2, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 31
    Location: New Orleans

    ClarkT Senior Member

    Shouldn't the convex hull wetter with much higher drag? There must be some data out there on this, but I have not seen it published. Anyone know where to find it?

    This variable deadrise angle is very similar to the old SeaCraft 21 hull geometry, which was quite revolutionary in its day.
     

  5. jfblouin
    Joined: Sep 2004
    Posts: 163
    Likes: 1, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 24
    Location: Chandler(Gaspesie) Quebec

    jfblouin Senior Member

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Feb 14, 2005
Loading...
Forum posts represent the experience, opinion, and view of individual users. Boat Design Net does not necessarily endorse nor share the view of each individual post.
When making potentially dangerous or financial decisions, always employ and consult appropriate professionals. Your circumstances or experience may be different.