MAX Prop equivalency??

Discussion in 'Props' started by geoleo, Feb 24, 2014.

  1. geoleo
    Joined: Dec 2011
    Posts: 15
    Likes: 0, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 10
    Location: Florida USA

    geoleo Junior Member

    Hello all you prop geniusies! I could not get a straight answer from PYI so I will try here. Question: Im replacing a standard Michigan 3 blade cruising17 D X 14P prop size. with a MAX Prop of same size and pitch. 3 Blade Classic 17DX 14P. Now which has more thrust at same RPM?? I have heard the Max Prop does because of larger blades. Help please. Thanks, George:confused:
     
  2. Mr Efficiency
    Joined: Oct 2010
    Posts: 10,386
    Likes: 1,048, Points: 113, Legacy Rep: 702
    Location: Australia

    Mr Efficiency Senior Member

    I am far from a "prop genius", but you could reasonably conclude that if the new prop produces more thrust at the same RPM, it may be at the expense of the engine working harder.
     
  3. Ad Hoc
    Joined: Oct 2008
    Posts: 7,888
    Likes: 1,778, Points: 113, Legacy Rep: 2488
    Location: Japan

    Ad Hoc Naval Architect

    With all things being equal (which they rarely are)...if the supplier is claiming higher thrust, it means, or is suggesting, they have a better open water efficiency. Since the thrust is proportional to the delivered power (same engine) and the speed of advance into the prop (same boat and stern arrangement) and then its efficiency. It may be just 0.001% better, but in the marketing world, a gain is a gain!
     
  4. philSweet
    Joined: May 2008
    Posts: 2,783
    Likes: 545, Points: 113, Legacy Rep: 1082
    Location: Beaufort, SC and H'ville, NC

    philSweet Senior Member

    The area is important for highly loaded props, but for a typical cruising setup operating well off peak loading most of the time, there shouldn't be much in it. If the bigger area prop won't let the motor hit rated rpm, it probably won't produce more thrust then either. If you are burning less than a gallon of diesel an hour, does it really matter? Feathering props are inherently less efficient because of the flat blades. The geometric advance of the prop varies along the span of the blade. They also have to make room for the mechanicals, so have a bigger hub and fatter blade roots.

    In the end, it depends on how well the original prop matched the motor, tranny and hull resistance. And on how Maxprop chooses to define 14P.

    I'm surprised the Maxprop has a larger projected blade area than the Michigan wheel.

    <edit> cross posted with Ad Hoc
     

  5. FAST FRED
    Joined: Oct 2002
    Posts: 4,519
    Likes: 111, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 1009
    Location: Conn in summers , Ortona FL in winter , with big d

    FAST FRED Senior Member

Loading...
Forum posts represent the experience, opinion, and view of individual users. Boat Design Net does not necessarily endorse nor share the view of each individual post.
When making potentially dangerous or financial decisions, always employ and consult appropriate professionals. Your circumstances or experience may be different.