Keel Design

Discussion in 'All Things Boats & Boating' started by Lyle Creffield, Dec 21, 2006.

  1. Lyle Creffield
    Joined: Jun 2006
    Posts: 35
    Likes: 0, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 10
    Location: Sunshine Coast Australia Lat 27S

    Lyle Creffield Junior Member

    Hi

    My question relates to reducing a 1.8 m draft, 3m toe, 3.3 mean keel length, cord of 300mm attached to a 14.2m LWL crusing sloop

    By reducing the draft to 1.5 yet maintaining the ballast C of G the same

    Wings - not new

    simply a wing of 900mm total width, same cord, same length, same ballast C of G

    Provided the vertical keel area and sufficient for direction stability

    why not?
     
  2. MikeJohns
    Joined: Aug 2004
    Posts: 3,192
    Likes: 208, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 2054
    Location: Australia

    MikeJohns Senior Member

    Lyle,

    Reduced performance to windward with more leeway. Problems getting hooked under coral at times and makes brute force towing off much harder.

    The wings will add an end plate which can compensate to some extent for the loss of keel depth (but not that much). Usually when retrofitted they often add a lot of turbulance (drag) unless very carefully designed and that means tank testing.

    I'd stick with the 6 foot draft on a 45 footer if you are planning for blue water .
     
  3. Tim B
    Joined: Jan 2003
    Posts: 1,438
    Likes: 59, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 841
    Location: Southern England

    Tim B Senior Member

    Except that you can't see the Reynolds number effects in a tank-test, and therefore you're getting bogus data. Wind-tunnel tests or CFD are your best options for optimisation. Niether are cheap.

    There is a lot of information about reducing the draught of a yacht on this forum, I suggest you have a search around. I have expressed my opinions on the matter several times. In short, "It will cause a lot of problems. Do you really need to do it?"

    Tim B.
     
Loading...
Similar Threads
  1. rob8
    Replies:
    6
    Views:
    1,857
  2. rcnesneg
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    1,554
  3. sun
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    780
  4. Moonlightshadow1
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    840
  5. rcfind
    Replies:
    1
    Views:
    567
  6. Ike
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    741
  7. Driiftwood
    Replies:
    5
    Views:
    1,256
  8. wet feet
    Replies:
    14
    Views:
    1,233
  9. Squidly-Diddly
    Replies:
    2
    Views:
    1,445
  10. hariandro
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    1,687
Forum posts represent the experience, opinion, and view of individual users. Boat Design Net does not necessarily endorse nor share the view of each individual post.
When making potentially dangerous or financial decisions, always employ and consult appropriate professionals. Your circumstances or experience may be different.