Is rhino still the way to go for a hobbyist?

Discussion in 'Software' started by pironiero, Nov 30, 2025.

  1. SukiSolo1
    Joined: Monday
    Posts: 2
    Likes: 2, Points: 3
    Location: Hampshire UK

    SukiSolo1 New Member

    I have been aware of the Orca plugin pretty much since it came out. AFAIK it will help you quite a bit on generating the curve of areas automatically so you can see what section changes do. As lofting surfaces IS a History feature in Rhino you can simplify changes and reiterate pretty quickly. I'm not sure you will need much more than that as it's quick to give the CofBuoyancy anyway. Try and find someone else whose has used Orca or is still using it - likely better on keelboats and will probably give righting moments etc. I liked Rhino 5 and ran it on a Win 7 box. Went straight to rhino 7 upgrade but jumped OS to Win 11, I think that's why I missed Ver 6 it would not install into Win 7!. I jumped XP, 8 and 10, no biggie.

    It's really important to consider the dynamic of a hull through the range. You will find some that probably have great static figures but bury the nose easily as you can't sink the stern. No CAD system is going to give you that feel. My own 'feel' is that 12 foot boats are hard to get right whether single or double handed especially plane take off and staying on the plane. I've built a couple this sort of length, the second genuinely competitive even after 15 years. At 14 feet plus boats are a lot easier and just go fast enough for it to be far less of a problem. There's a certain small kids rotomoulded boat that took 5 prototypes to get right - proof that small boats are harder design work. It was worth it, the sales have been very very good. If you want another example, the stern of some designs becomes extended with heel - look at 2.4 meter yachts so they suddenly drag water further along the rear sections and extend their displacement speed window upwards. The more different development class boats you can sail the better you understand small changes in design and their effects. Having spoken to at least half a dozen qualified naval architects at the relatively small scale of dinghies what you build is the test prototype. Bear in mind that even here 3mm on a section can be worth 100m in a mile on a reach (I'm pretty sure Jo Richards found that out with his F Dutchman), though I stand to be corrected.

    On getting a smooth shape hull in the UK we have a Class called National 12s and their rules allowed a 4 plank construction when they developed a cheaper alternative to full clinker back in the 1970s'. They went smooth ie not overlapped planks at the same time - so three chines per side plus keel. The designers found how close they could get to a fully cold moulded smooth hull at the time, this is where the 3mm max deviation from a perfect smooth shape comes in. Note this does not stop a deliberate chine... especially aft.

    Currently the hard stuff is primarily in foils and all that entails with airborne hulls, look how fast that changes in Moths.
     
    pironiero likes this.
  2. BlueBell
    Joined: May 2017
    Posts: 3,270
    Likes: 1,233, Points: 113
    Location: Victoria BC Canada

    BlueBell . . . _ _ _ . . . _ _ _

    Kind of says it all right there.

    So, who's trolling? An accomplished Naval Architect? I don't think so.

    I'm glad you finally found the answer you were "hoping" for.

    Carry-on.
     
    pironiero likes this.
  3. pironiero
    Joined: Apr 2020
    Posts: 283
    Likes: 21, Points: 18
    Location: Pattaya, TH

    pironiero Coping

    Oh wow, thanks a lot!
    I honestly don't know what to say.

    My current project aims for the least amount of chines(i figured 2 is the best option for a light planing Hull, good WS shape on the heel while minimizing the amount of hours for construction) and full flat panel construction, the main rule id like to fit in is a classe950 box rule, although if IMER flies -maybe i make some adjustments and switch to it(although hopes are quite low, given all that I've learned, it seem more like a cashgrab than a proper racing class, the curse of the void between mini 6.50 and class 40 and all.

    That being said there is very little chance I'll actually build it, but a man can dream.
     
  4. mc_rash
    Joined: Aug 2020
    Posts: 233
    Likes: 66, Points: 28
    Location: Netherlands

    mc_rash Senior Member

    Rhino contains all the necessary stuff/commands and provides enough information(area, volume, moments) which is needed to calculate all the stuff related to Naval Architrcture.
     
    pironiero likes this.
  5. Tops
    Joined: Aug 2021
    Posts: 408
    Likes: 122, Points: 43
    Location: Minnesota

    Tops Senior Member

    Is there a website that is the current keeper of the class 950 box rules that can be shared?
     
  6. pironiero
    Joined: Apr 2020
    Posts: 283
    Likes: 21, Points: 18
    Location: Pattaya, TH

    pironiero Coping

  7. Tops
    Joined: Aug 2021
    Posts: 408
    Likes: 122, Points: 43
    Location: Minnesota

    Tops Senior Member

  8. pironiero
    Joined: Apr 2020
    Posts: 283
    Likes: 21, Points: 18
    Location: Pattaya, TH

    pironiero Coping

    There is some movement around this class in [REDACTED], but i won't soil the fun
     

  • Loading...
    Forum posts represent the experience, opinion, and view of individual users. Boat Design Net does not necessarily endorse nor share the view of each individual post.
    When making potentially dangerous or financial decisions, always employ and consult appropriate professionals. Your circumstances or experience may be different.