Hullspeed calculations for larger vessels?

Discussion in 'Hydrodynamics and Aerodynamics' started by Jgerstemeier, Jul 15, 2016.

1. Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 1
Likes: 0, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 10

JgerstemeierNew Member

Hello all. I teach a high school physics class in Philadelphia. I'm trying to make connections between physics and the real world including sailing.

One of the more interesting connections I've found involves hullspeed. Since the general equation seems pretty simple: Theoretical Hullspeed = 1.34 x LWL^1/2 this would seem to lend itself to a high school physics class. (Not too hard, just quantitative enough to give learners a sense that they're really doing something without blowing them out of the water with euler equations and stuff)

Questions:
1. Can this equation be used in thinking about ships in the age of sail and shortly thereafter? For example, does it make sense to use it in a lesson regarding topsail schooners in the Revenue Service -VS- barbary pirates between 1790 and 1812? The Independence Seaport Museum has a great lifesize model of a schooner I'd like to use and a learning space.
2. Is the connection between V = fλ and Theoretical Hullspeed = 1.34 x LWL^1/2 solid enough to explore in a physics class setting?

2. Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 40, Points: 48, Legacy Rep: 155
Location: North Texas

RurudyneSenior Member

As I understand it, hull speed is rooted in observations. It is not a hard and fast rule or "physics" but a reflection of averages.

In essence it captures a common point at which the development of a boat's wave system matches it's length at the waterline and the displacement hull boat has to push uphill against its own waves to go any faster.

What ever makes the wave system stronger -- bluff bows, broad beam relative to length, deep draft -- exasperates this and the reverse is true (fine bow, narrow beam, shallow draft reduce the strength of the wave system).

As for the wave system and it's different components, there is an online discussion I'll link to which may help explain the different components of same: http://www.ivorbittle.co.uk/Article...he bulbous bow for my site This one again.htm

3. Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,747
Likes: 600, Points: 113, Legacy Rep: 1110
Location: Philippines

rxcompositeSenior Member

I agree with Rurudyne. It is not based on physics and it is only a rule of thumb. Even the 1.34 constant varies as some would use 1.1. Other books use 90% of the length, not 100%.

Predicting speed is based on so many factors and that is where physics come in, to a certain extent, as most formulae are made to fit based on averages of tests.

4. Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 7,698
Likes: 1,570, Points: 113, Legacy Rep: 2488
Location: Japan

Hello Jgerstemeier

Welcome to the forum.

Before delving into your answer further...what age group are the students you teach...to provide a measure of their current understanding of maths and physics. Since to answer your question, it can be either very basic with a lot of generalisations, or, rather more detailed and with lots of maths added in.

5. Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,913
Likes: 73, Points: 48, Legacy Rep: 739
Location: New Orleans

StumbleSenior Member

Actually I think this could be a great high school level physics example. Start with the basic formula, which as mentioned was derived by observation. Then use it to segway into a deeper examination of the same phenomina. It's a great example of how a ball park number (1.34) upon deeper research turns into a much more refined equasion (1.34 is no longer a constant but a variable, based on the l/b of the vessel).

In the same way that Newton works for a gun, but you need relatively to get a space craft to Mars.

You could also get into ways to 'cheat' physical rules by exploring bulbous bows, but that's more engineering.

6. Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 16,649
Likes: 1,614, Points: 123, Legacy Rep: 2031
Location: Milwaukee, WI

gonzoSenior Member

Actually, Newtonian physics can put a spacecraft in Mars. The speeds will not be high. They also work for calculating vessel speeds. At high school math and physics level there probably won't be any calculation of turbulence or laminar flow. They may be given values for friction and wave resistance on different hull shapes.

7. Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 811
Likes: 64, Points: 28, Legacy Rep: 41
Location: Delta BC

JSLSenior Member

Speed-length ratio is only one of many ratios and the value of 1.34 is sort of a benchmark based on wavelength & perhaps a guideline limit for average 'displacement' hulls... whatever they are. It is one of many ratios that are inter-related. Another ratio is displacement/ length ratio where low figures could achieve an S/L of over 1.34 and high figures (big, heavy boats) have difficulty. There are lots of good books (ie: Nature of Boats by Dave Gerr) and stuff on line.

8. Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 40, Points: 48, Legacy Rep: 155
Location: North Texas

RurudyneSenior Member

Reminded me: Sponberg's The Design Ratios

9. Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,519
Likes: 111, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 1009
Location: Conn in summers , Ortona FL in winter , with big d

FAST FREDSenior Member

Even if hull speed were a fact the question of POWER remains , as to weather you can get there in a 10K breeze or need 35K to do so.

Fat heavy boat,light long narrow boat , acres of sail or barely enough to move in a gale?

Forum posts represent the experience, opinion, and view of individual users. Boat Design Net does not necessarily endorse nor share the view of each individual post.
When making potentially dangerous or financial decisions, always employ and consult appropriate professionals. Your circumstances or experience may be different.