hull speed power calc

Discussion in 'Propulsion' started by nautical, Apr 29, 2007.

  1. RANCHI OTTO
    Joined: Apr 2005
    Posts: 1,042
    Likes: 37, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 535
    Location: TRIESTE (ITALY)

    RANCHI OTTO Naval Architect

    The VP engine has 500 hp x 2 = 1000 hp

    For me you need 2 x 600 hp at 80% of max. power i.e. 600/0.8=750 hp each.
    To be installed 2 x 750 hp

    Stabilizer ? better fixed bilge keel and a deeper central skeg to protect the propellers and to avoid lateral wind effect..
     
  2. nautical
    Joined: Feb 2005
    Posts: 73
    Likes: 0, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 10
    Location: Onboard

    nautical Junior Member

    Ranchi you are killing me, I guess here is the guy. I was going to put only one of these at first . geuss I was naive,

    Is there emprical or rule if thumb to put a Skeg. yeah stabilizer to prevent rolling
     

    Attached Files:

  3. RANCHI OTTO
    Joined: Apr 2005
    Posts: 1,042
    Likes: 37, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 535
    Location: TRIESTE (ITALY)

    RANCHI OTTO Naval Architect

    Fine!

    Have a check to this for Dopt....but it would be better if you have the resistance, to use the Wageningen B Series...

    The diagr. rpm at prop. vs Dopt(m) for various powers (hp)
     

    Attached Files:

    • DOPT.jpg
      DOPT.jpg
      File size:
      445.9 KB
      Views:
      1,148
  4. nautical
    Joined: Feb 2005
    Posts: 73
    Likes: 0, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 10
    Location: Onboard

    nautical Junior Member

    kinda hard to read off the diagram. Wageningen b I will try that I guess. Thanks a lot
     
  5. RANCHI OTTO
    Joined: Apr 2005
    Posts: 1,042
    Likes: 37, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 535
    Location: TRIESTE (ITALY)

    RANCHI OTTO Naval Architect

    It is better?:p
     

    Attached Files:

  6. RANCHI OTTO
    Joined: Apr 2005
    Posts: 1,042
    Likes: 37, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 535
    Location: TRIESTE (ITALY)

    RANCHI OTTO Naval Architect

    Don't install active stabilizers, they will add resistance...put fixed bilge keel!
     
  7. nautical
    Joined: Feb 2005
    Posts: 73
    Likes: 0, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 10
    Location: Onboard

    nautical Junior Member

    thats too bad. with such low Rpms the engine is giving no out put IT seems I have to Optimize for both Rpm and Diameter at the same time.
     
  8. nautical
    Joined: Feb 2005
    Posts: 73
    Likes: 0, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 10
    Location: Onboard

    nautical Junior Member

    Do think it will ad a norticable about of resistance. I am thinking of 9 sqr feet fins at midship section.
     
  9. RANCHI OTTO
    Joined: Apr 2005
    Posts: 1,042
    Likes: 37, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 535
    Location: TRIESTE (ITALY)

    RANCHI OTTO Naval Architect

    Have a look on gearbox available reduction ratios and you will find for each propeller rpm the corresponding Dopt.

    All appendages will increase the bare hull resistance...rudders, strut palms, brackets, shafts, fins....and take care with the high superstructure frontal area.

    To evaluate appendages resistance:

    Rapp (% of bare hull resist.) = 1/(0.005*Fvol^2+1.05)

    To evaluate air resistance:

    Raa (kg) = 0.5*0.125*(Vk*0.51445+2.36)^2*Aw*Caa
    where Aw (frontal area m^2) and Caa =0.5
     
  10. nautical
    Joined: Feb 2005
    Posts: 73
    Likes: 0, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 10
    Location: Onboard

    nautical Junior Member

    Thanks you are really helping me out. again i think i will need where the formuleas come from. I have got a some fomuleas too but dont have urs

    Raa=Caa*0.5*ro*Aw*Vk^2
    there are some complicated ones too

    there is one for Skegs
    Dsk=0.5Cf*Vm^2*Ask
    Ask = area of skeg
    Vm = average velocity at skeg
    Cf = frictional coeficient depending on the lenght of skeg
     
  11. RANCHI OTTO
    Joined: Apr 2005
    Posts: 1,042
    Likes: 37, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 535
    Location: TRIESTE (ITALY)

    RANCHI OTTO Naval Architect

    in my formula for Raa....
    ro=0.125
    Vk is on meter/sec2 not knots
    2.36 is the wind speed meter/sec^2 for Beaufort scale wind 2 and to be added to vessel's speed
    Caa is an aerodynamic coeff. of penetration like for car....I've taken 0.5 (medium figure)

    For skeg I usually add his wetted surface to the vessel wetted surface.
     
  12. Olav
    Joined: Dec 2003
    Posts: 334
    Likes: 50, Points: 38, Legacy Rep: 460
    Location: Filia pulchra Lubecæ

    Olav naval architect

    Ranchi Otto,

    I regularly read your great postings with a lot of interest, thanks a lot for sharing your experience and graphs. :) Unfortunately we don't do those things at uni, so I have to educade myself by reading here at boatdesign.net.

    But am I right that rho should be 1025kg/m³ (not 0.125) and Vk and wind velocity in m/s, not m/s²? Or do I get something completely wrong here? ;)
     
  13. nautical
    Joined: Feb 2005
    Posts: 73
    Likes: 0, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 10
    Location: Onboard

    nautical Junior Member

    Yea olav ro should be either 1.025 ton/m3 or 1025 kg/m3. And i think Rachi is talking about ^2 outside the brackets. But in his formulea Vk is in knots I guess because its multiplied by 0.51445 to make it m/s.
     

  14. RANCHI OTTO
    Joined: Apr 2005
    Posts: 1,042
    Likes: 37, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 535
    Location: TRIESTE (ITALY)

    RANCHI OTTO Naval Architect

    Danke schoen Olav,

    I do of my best!:)
     
Loading...
Forum posts represent the experience, opinion, and view of individual users. Boat Design Net does not necessarily endorse nor share the view of each individual post.
When making potentially dangerous or financial decisions, always employ and consult appropriate professionals. Your circumstances or experience may be different.