Global Warming? are humans to blame?

Discussion in 'All Things Boats & Boating' started by hansp77, Sep 11, 2006.

?

Do you believe

  1. Global Warming is occuring as a direct result of Human Activity.

    106 vote(s)
    51.7%
  2. IF Gloabal Warming is occurring it is as a result of Non-Human or Natural Processes.

    99 vote(s)
    48.3%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Yobarnacle
    Joined: Nov 2011
    Posts: 1,744
    Likes: 129, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 851
    Location: Mexico, Florida

    Yobarnacle Senior Member holding true course

    CO2 is nuclear waste or chemical weapon or DDT?
    Define your pollution clean up project, and we can discuss the feasibility.

    Erecting 'STRAWMEN' gets your tactic spotlighted as 'ERECTING STRAWMEN'!

    I didn't insult your inteligence or twist your name around untill YOU were demostrating that disrespect toward me over MANY posts. Sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. I'm trying to teach you how NOT to debate, by turning your own tactics onto YOU!
    Don't like it, don't do it!
     
  2. variverrunner
    Joined: Dec 2009
    Posts: 98
    Likes: 8, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 85
    Location: New York, USA

    variverrunner Junior Member

    Yobbo, You just barely mentioned the Illuminatti?

    Yobarncle

    Yobbo, Is the following an example of your barely mentioning something? And NOT presenting a case to believe in it ? Really????


    I especially enjoyed your bit about the Illuminatti currently controling the World News media. ROTFLMAO.

    Allan




















     
  3. Yobarnacle
    Joined: Nov 2011
    Posts: 1,744
    Likes: 129, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 851
    Location: Mexico, Florida

    Yobarnacle Senior Member holding true course

    The bulk of these posts were to support the concept IT WAS POSSIBLE and that evidence DID EXIST THEY EXIST!

    My 'mentioned' manipulation by the 'illuminati' was restricted to current affairs except this post:

    "An old investigation principle. Follow the money.
    Want to know who the elite, or NWO, or illuminati, or the 'shadow' government is and has been for about 500 years, at least?
    Follow the money.
    Who financed the wars? Who financed Stalin? Who financed Mao? Who financed Hitler? Who finances AGW?
    It's the same group. Same families. Actually one family if you look at who is related to who, inspite of different surnames."


    And I pointed out in THEIR literature was the objective of controlling not only the world's finances, but news media. Seems they were sucessfull.

    Everything is relative. I could have posted THIS! Starting with the url:
    http://www.ariescomputer.com/illuminati/about/ill1.html#top

    Part I: Dawn of Time to 1000 C.E.
    Part II: 1000 C.E. to 1776 C.E.
    Part III: 1776 C.E. to 1920 C.E.
    Part IV: 1920 C.E. to 1950 C.E.
    Part V: 1950 C.E. to 1973 C.E.

    And then purported evidence and documents to SUPPORT the timeline.

    I WAS very reserved in posting about illuminati. :D
     
  4. variverrunner
    Joined: Dec 2009
    Posts: 98
    Likes: 8, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 85
    Location: New York, USA

    variverrunner Junior Member

    Yobbo,

    Your Double Speak goes on and on and on.


    ARE you sure your not on Big Oil's dole?


    Allan
     
  5. Yobarnacle
    Joined: Nov 2011
    Posts: 1,744
    Likes: 129, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 851
    Location: Mexico, Florida

    Yobarnacle Senior Member holding true course

    I don't 'double talk'.
    You TRY, but aren't sucessfull.
     
  6. Frosty

    Frosty Previous Member


    Whooooaaa give that man a beer.
     
  7. Yobarnacle
    Joined: Nov 2011
    Posts: 1,744
    Likes: 129, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 851
    Location: Mexico, Florida

    Yobarnacle Senior Member holding true course

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by RayThackeray
    I'd put money down that the same "christians" have an arsenal of guns and spend their retirement hours online supporting Zimmerman's right to stalk people and then shoot them


    Ray
    Why don't you return to England if you don't like our american ways?
    Your 'opinion' that Zimmerman is GUILTY before he's even tried is un-american!

    "The presumption of innocence is very old in the English common law. While you don't find it written into an entrenched bill of rights in England as it is in the U.S. and Canada, both of those countries adopted the principle from English law.

    When people say that it's "guilty until proven innocent", they're usually criticizing the fact that most members of the public (and judges and juries as well, arguably) tend to presume that, if the police have laid charges, the accused must be guilty."


    "When I was there (England) I was considered guilty by the police until proven innocent in court. The freakin prosecutor even apologiced to the cop when I was found not guilty"

    http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110709005125AAwSexn
     
  8. Boston

    Boston Previous Member

    Your all far better off just putting him on ignore and moving forward on our discussion of climate shift issues. Re-posting his tripe just wastes more time and effort on a senseless effort to break him out of his delusional state. There is no talking sense to someone who prefers there happy place to reality, that would be a job for a trained psychiatrist. They'd put him on drugs and screen him for violent tendencies, which he's already admitted to when he blathered on about his paranoia's about generational cleansing or some such nonsense like that.

    Just put him on ignore so we can move forward.

    how about something on climate change

    from
    http://www.aaas.org/news/releases/2011/0818sp_species.shtml

    what it boils down to is the faster the changes the fewer species that will survive it, particularly in its initial stages, species that cannot move fast enough will simply die out due to altering micro climates. Once enough species are lost, trophic cascade is inevitable and the ecosystem as a whole is lost. Its called mass extinction and its happening much faster than previously predicted.
     
  9. spork

    spork Previous Member

    It's "you're". Please get that right for me just once.

    It's "their". Seriously, you could get it right occasionally just by chance.

    Paranoia's? Really?

    You don't think delusional people should be allowed to vote, but you obviously aren't aware that you're delusional. It actually pains me somewhat that we're generally in agreement on the topic of AGW.
     
  10. masalai
    Joined: Oct 2007
    Posts: 6,823
    Likes: 120, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 1882
    Location: cruising, Australia

    masalai masalai

    OMG are'nt we becoming anal in our point scoring... I am outa here...
     
  11. RayThackeray
    Joined: Apr 2011
    Posts: 147
    Likes: 12, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 90
    Location: Alameda, CA, USA

    RayThackeray Senior Member

    Eh? Let me get this straight - you think that someone's delusional because they fail in spelling?

    While I find the same errors to be very irritating, this is a very strange diagnosis. Perhaps dyslexia is more likely?

     
  12. Boston

    Boston Previous Member

    E gads I have a stalker. I guess we can add that to the list of <removed insult directed at another member>

    oh well, I've got far better things to do with my holiday than hold a grudge match with the likes of you.

    cheers
    B

    Interesting though how some folks just can't keep there idiocy off the forums, its like a nesting ground for whackadoos and stalkers. Really is there no prayer at all that we actually discuss climate shift on the climate shift thread ? Crazy how disrespectful some people really are.
     
  13. spork

    spork Previous Member

    No. I think that someone's <removed insult directed at another member> because they've proven to me beyond any shadow of a doubt that they're <removed insult directed at another member>. His spelling errors just happen to annoy the cr@p out of me.

    Not a diagnosis. I just didn't separate my two thoughts as clearly as I should have perhaps.
     
  14. spork

    spork Previous Member

    And there you have it folks - the proof that Boston is completely <removed insult directed at another member>
     

  15. Boat Design Net Moderator
    Joined: Feb 2010
    Posts: 520
    Likes: 113, Points: 43, Legacy Rep: 1004
    Location: www.boatdesign.net

    Boat Design Net Moderator Moderator

    It seems this is probably time to close this particular thread. The people taking part in this thread on both sides of the issue seem entrenched in their views at this point, and it seems now too many people in the last page are only insulting eachother and no longer debating the facts of the matter or bringing new scientific information to the table. Therefore, rather than wasting further bandwidth repeating the same things over and over and over, or especially wasting bandwidth on further pointless insults, the thread is being closed at this point.
     
    1 person likes this.
Loading...
Similar Threads
  1. Frosty
    Replies:
    115
    Views:
    8,039
  2. upchurchmr
    Replies:
    41
    Views:
    4,498
  3. sdowney717
    Replies:
    31
    Views:
    2,973
  4. rasorinc
    Replies:
    7
    Views:
    1,561
  5. rasorinc
    Replies:
    171
    Views:
    12,897
  6. Guillermo
    Replies:
    20
    Views:
    2,723
  7. Boston
    Replies:
    162
    Views:
    12,131
  8. Boston
    Replies:
    4,617
    Views:
    304,287
  9. masalai
    Replies:
    3,693
    Views:
    234,856
  10. rasorinc
    Replies:
    8
    Views:
    1,905
Forum posts represent the experience, opinion, and view of individual users. Boat Design Net does not necessarily endorse nor share the view of each individual post.
When making potentially dangerous or financial decisions, always employ and consult appropriate professionals. Your circumstances or experience may be different.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.