Jeff
Moderator
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2001
- Posts
- 1,368
- Reaction score
- 71
- Location
- Great Lakes
Certainly if someone gives dangerous advice on the forum and other members know so, they will continue to be encouraged to post a reply to that effect and hopefully thanked for doing so. But there were other situations where a member just routinely posts off-topic or 'clown-ish' replies where the majority of the community wishes to discourage this - if you simply turn the thread into a discussion about the particular poster, you drift it further off-topic, so in that case the reputation system will hopefully be a somewhat helpful tool to keep things on topic and to give feedback without taking away from the main discussion at hand and without having to invest too much time to do so. My goal is for the reputation points to be just a small feature that can be helpful to posters to gauge how their posts are being recieved... I don't necessarily think anyone has to worry whether their reputation changes from 31 to 32 (or vice-versa.) I'll only be using the reputation points as moderator to gauge whether someone has a positive 500, 100 or negative 50 to determine how much latitude to give them when things are in a gray area. I have not seen evidence of ganging being a problem to date - I think the great majority of people on the forum here have a lot of integrity and will use the system responsibly to make the forum a better place.