The short overview about diesel-electric and alternative energy propulsion:
1. Series propulsion: the total weight of the two electric motors, controller and battery (optional) is greater then that of a mechanical gearbox. The total efficiency tank to prop is also lower. Classic marine uses are submarines, tugs, cruiseships, military.
2. Parallel propulsion: more weight since it adds motor, controller and batteries to a normal mechanical gearbox. Used by some new sailboats. More prevalent in the military as turbine-diesel parallel.
3. Trough the water parallel propulsion: like 2, only with two completely independent propshafts. Seldom used.
4. Series-parallel propulsion: engine power is partially converted to electricity and added back to the shaft. To my knowledge not used in marine settings.
5. Trough the water series-parallel propulsion: used extensively in marine service for thrusters.
Alternative "green" energy:
1. Batteries: most efficient option (generation to propshaft), does not profit from the economy of scale effect. Limited to small/medium applications depending on infrastructure.
2. Hydrogen: next step down the efficiency scale, highly dependent on infrastructure. Rapid refueling but difficult on board storage. Profits from economy of scale but mobile large scale remains difficult.
3. Ammonia: another step down, good emission values, suitable for large scale.
4. Methanol: yet another step down, simpler tech then ammonia.
5. Synthetic gasoline/diesel: worst efficiency, simple tech.
Some comments on the anterior posts:
The Toyota Prius (and others) hybrid system is of the series-parallel type and performs the function of a CVT. Boats don't need CVT's so this particular system offers no advantages.
The Toyota Mirai exemplifies the problems with hydrogen. The full tank weighs 90kg (only 5kg are hydrogen), and is good for ~500km. The tank to wheel efficiency is up to 65% (it's a fuel cell vehicle) the total system weight is higher then the equivalent diesel, and volume is also higher.