Whats marine aluminum alloy is better Sealium or Alustar?

Discussion in 'Materials' started by jaboshipyard, Mar 8, 2013.

  1. jaboshipyard
    Joined: Feb 2013
    Posts: 12
    Likes: 0, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 10
    Location: Poland Gdansk

    jaboshipyard Jan Wierzchowski

    Hello all !

    What you think what aluminium alloy is better Sealium or Alustar for yachts ? Maybe it's not worth their price and better to use standard aluminum 5083 ?

    I will be greatful for your opinions and differences between this materials.

    Best Regards,
    Jan
     
  2. Ad Hoc
    Joined: Oct 2008
    Posts: 7,788
    Likes: 1,688, Points: 113, Legacy Rep: 2488
    Location: Japan

    Ad Hoc Naval Architect

    hello Jan,

    Welcome to the forum.

    It really depends upon the application.

    These improved alloys have better fatigue resistance and also a higher allowable design stress. Which in theory sounds great.

    But when you do your sums and you find that you calculate a value of say 6.2mm for your bottom structure, what would you use, 6.0mm sheet. Whereas if you use 5059 or 5383, the calculation shows 5.8mm, great, but what plate thickness would you use, 6.0mm still!

    But on another boat, you may find that it is subjected to fatigue, more than a standard boat, thus going for the improved fatigue resistance would be of benefit.

    So on smaller boats there is no real gain. But, on larger boats in the say 80m+ size, or if a real need for fatigue improvement, then yes there may be benefit, in terms of the cost is offset by the weight savings.

    Thus, it depends upon the application...and cost v weight savings.
     
  3. jaboshipyard
    Joined: Feb 2013
    Posts: 12
    Likes: 0, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 10
    Location: Poland Gdansk

    jaboshipyard Jan Wierzchowski

    Hello Ad Hoc,
    Thank You for your quick answer.
    Yes I know taht is depends upon the application. I thinking too use one of this kind improved aluminium on ca 22 meters long sailing yacht. And I whant to get more info. about this materials.

    When you saying that "in terms of the cost is offset by the weight savings" you mean that what I save on weight I will still pay the same for all materials like using standard alloy ?
     
  4. Ad Hoc
    Joined: Oct 2008
    Posts: 7,788
    Likes: 1,688, Points: 113, Legacy Rep: 2488
    Location: Japan

    Ad Hoc Naval Architect

    Well, that's the point, whats the difference? You will have to work out if there is a cost and/or weight benefit. You will only know once you design the structure using 5083 and its cost/weight, and then the same with 5383/5059. Then you'll know.
     

  5. jaboshipyard
    Joined: Feb 2013
    Posts: 12
    Likes: 0, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 10
    Location: Poland Gdansk

    jaboshipyard Jan Wierzchowski

    Yes that is true I will have to work out :)

    Thanks for your opinion Ad Hoc


    Someone have more opinion and experiences ?
     
Loading...
Similar Threads
  1. Boston
    Replies:
    48
    Views:
    6,886
  2. David Grimes
    Replies:
    21
    Views:
    3,409
  3. John Smithson
    Replies:
    4
    Views:
    1,094
  4. Metalbuffer1
    Replies:
    17
    Views:
    2,077
  5. mariobrothers88
    Replies:
    0
    Views:
    1,228
  6. Edem
    Replies:
    33
    Views:
    5,580
  7. tontoOx
    Replies:
    7
    Views:
    2,735
  8. Matthew777
    Replies:
    32
    Views:
    4,478
  9. xellz
    Replies:
    8
    Views:
    2,220
  10. Anatol
    Replies:
    8
    Views:
    2,591
Forum posts represent the experience, opinion, and view of individual users. Boat Design Net does not necessarily endorse nor share the view of each individual post.
When making potentially dangerous or financial decisions, always employ and consult appropriate professionals. Your circumstances or experience may be different.