Wet or dry mass in virtual mass of a towed object?

Discussion in 'Boat Design' started by floating, Jun 16, 2009.

  1. floating
    Joined: Jun 2009
    Posts: 65
    Likes: 0, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 10
    Location: NJ

    floating Junior Member

    I would like to calculate the virtual mass (actual mass plus added mass) of a towed object, including the lines used to tow it. I'm calculating the mass of each component then summing them up. Do I use the wet rather than dry mass? If so, does it matter that a section of line is buoyant, so its wet mass is negative? [I guess it still requires force to tow it because its added mass is positive, but the concept is confusing.]
     
  2. Ad Hoc
    Joined: Oct 2008
    Posts: 7,773
    Likes: 1,678, Points: 113, Legacy Rep: 2488
    Location: Japan

    Ad Hoc Naval Architect

    It all depends upon the shape and also the axis that the shape is being pulled.

    It is the "below" volume shape, and the "mass" is the buoyancy of this immersed volume.

    Hoerner's "Fluid Dynmaic Drag" book is excellent and will give you basic added mass of shapes. A must book!
     
  3. Ad Hoc
    Joined: Oct 2008
    Posts: 7,773
    Likes: 1,678, Points: 113, Legacy Rep: 2488
    Location: Japan

    Ad Hoc Naval Architect

    PS..should have added, as a very very VERY rough and crude rule of thumb, around 80% of mass, as added mass. BUT really depends upon the shape and direction of flow relative to the shape etc etc etc. It is a good starting position anyway.
     
  4. jehardiman
    Joined: Aug 2004
    Posts: 3,762
    Likes: 1,152, Points: 113, Legacy Rep: 2040
    Location: Port Orchard, Washington, USA

    jehardiman Senior Member

    The answer is you have to add both, the coefficient of added mass is dependent on your shape relative to the flow, and no, everything always has positive mass both in acceleration and deceleration (i.e. your tow body can ram you if contitions are correct).

    The equation is Mefficitive = M + Ca *V*rho, where Ca is dependent on the direction of acceleration, and V is the envelope volume (especially important for "open" bodies), and rho is the fluid mass density.

    Hoerner is good, but Blevins is better for Ca. Rule of thumb for long slender axisymetric bodies is Ca=0.1 along the axis and 1.0 accross it. For pure square or I-beam shapes Ca transverse =2. For other angles of attack a rough Ca = 0.1+.9*(sin^2(alpha)*Ca transverse). It is important to remember what Ca is; it is the intergral of pressure over the surface of the body caused by the acceleration of the steady state flow (which may already be accelerated relative to the free stream by the shape, but that is the pressure drag) over the body. It therefor works in both speeding up and slowing down. Many a tug has been rammed by it's tow.
     
    Last edited: Jun 16, 2009
  5. Ad Hoc
    Joined: Oct 2008
    Posts: 7,773
    Likes: 1,678, Points: 113, Legacy Rep: 2488
    Location: Japan

    Ad Hoc Naval Architect

    Jehardiman

    Not come across Blevins...what is the name of the book, i'll look it up.
    I've alwasy used Hoerner, but lost my copy when i moved to Japan :(
     
  6. jehardiman
    Joined: Aug 2004
    Posts: 3,762
    Likes: 1,152, Points: 113, Legacy Rep: 2040
    Location: Port Orchard, Washington, USA

    jehardiman Senior Member

  7. Ad Hoc
    Joined: Oct 2008
    Posts: 7,773
    Likes: 1,678, Points: 113, Legacy Rep: 2488
    Location: Japan

    Ad Hoc Naval Architect

    J.Man

    thanks...much cheaper than Hoerner's too!
     

  8. jehardiman
    Joined: Aug 2004
    Posts: 3,762
    Likes: 1,152, Points: 113, Legacy Rep: 2040
    Location: Port Orchard, Washington, USA

    jehardiman Senior Member

    Blevins is a lot like Hoerner. Gives the theory, then gives the compiled test data (with references to the actual paper/data!) to show the difference. I recommend it to everyone who wants a balanced insight to fluid dynamics
     
Loading...
Forum posts represent the experience, opinion, and view of individual users. Boat Design Net does not necessarily endorse nor share the view of each individual post.
When making potentially dangerous or financial decisions, always employ and consult appropriate professionals. Your circumstances or experience may be different.