How to compromise junk to trimaran?

Discussion in 'Boat Design' started by stozi, Dec 27, 2008.

  1. stozi
    Joined: Dec 2008
    Posts: 3
    Likes: 0, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 10
    Location: BC

    stozi New Member

    I've been looking around for a cruiser design. Both the junk rig and trimaran seem to have many advantages, but are hard to integrate. Nonetheless the Junk rig association says it can be done. People often say that the good thing about trimarans is their width for stays. To me, beachability, shallow draft, speed potential, positive buoyancy, deck space, and stability are more important than width for stays. The junk seems to be much easier and safer to reef, generally easier to handle and with less crew, resistant to accidental jybe, better downwind, quieter, cheaper, and home-buildable.

    It seems that the initial cost will be high, probably mitigated by the financial crisis, but maintenence costs, beaching to repaint and building one's own sails, will cut long term costs.

    The lack of existing designs is not encouraging. The closest things I've found are Chris White's Juniper and Dragon Wings, design which seems to have been replicated once or twice.

    If you can stick an unstayed mast in each cat hull with pleasing effect, I think you should be able to do it in a tri.

    If it really is just not worth it, how best to compromise? Copy that catamaran design? Use some kind of semi-stayed rig? is there one that allows the junk sail to operate as meant to? Are there any other options?

    Thanks!
     
  2. oldsailor7
    Joined: May 2008
    Posts: 2,097
    Likes: 44, Points: 48, Legacy Rep: 436
    Location: Sydney Australia

    oldsailor7 Senior Member

    IMHO junk sails are just that-------JUNK.

    Bin there, Done that. (Ask James Wharram).
     
  3. stozi
    Joined: Dec 2008
    Posts: 3
    Likes: 0, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 10
    Location: BC

    stozi New Member

    Thanks for your opinion. However I wonder how thoroughly Wharram experimented, given the diversity of junk layouts, and his tendancy towards cats rather than tris.
     
  4. Tad
    Joined: Mar 2002
    Posts: 2,321
    Likes: 214, Points: 73, Legacy Rep: 2281
    Location: Flattop Islands

    Tad Boat Designer

    There are few cruising trimaran designs for a number of reasons, high cost relative to interior volume and load carrying ability is one. Also minimal accommodation in relation to all the parts and surface area you must build. and awkward or impossible marina mooring is another negative. The major plus of a tri is high stability with minimal weight. Cruising is rarely about minimal weight. In my experience the majority of cruisers seem to want to take it all along, including the dishwasher and trash compactor.

    To get reasonable accommodation the tri needs to be large, as Juniper is, a 50+ foot boat that has the accommodation of a 36-38' monohull.

    So the main reason for building a trimaran is high performance.

    The major pluses of the junk (chinese lug) rig are, ease of handling and simplicity of construction. High performance is not the intention or aim of this rig. Mediocre to reasonable performance is possible. Some of the problems are lack of sail area for light air, and high weight vs sail area. Obviously less than optimum shape on many (most?) points of sail is also a problem.

    The trimaran form certainly lends itself to installation of unstayed or partially stayed masts on centerline.

    BC is an area of very light air in summer, so then your tri becomes a powerboat, which is fine.

    To me the two concepts (lug plus tri) do not really mesh well into a unified whole. Great boats are conceived as a complete system, all parts must seamlessly integrate with the rest. It takes considerable vision to successfully meld the disparate parts. With clients I discourage this type of undertaking as the potential for failure/major financial loss is very high. White elephants are a glut on the market....

    Good luck with it.
     
    1 person likes this.
  5. oldsailor7
    Joined: May 2008
    Posts: 2,097
    Likes: 44, Points: 48, Legacy Rep: 436
    Location: Sydney Australia

    oldsailor7 Senior Member

    Thanks TAD for a very concise revue of the subject.

    Having been intimately involved in the development of multihulls for the past forty six years I have never heard a better or more clearly put evaluation of the pros and cons of Cat vs Tri as a unified system.

    Cheers. Paddy. :cool: :) :D
     
  6. FAST FRED
    Joined: Oct 2002
    Posts: 4,519
    Likes: 111, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 1009
    Location: Conn in summers , Ortona FL in winter , with big d

    FAST FRED Senior Member

    However I wonder how thoroughly Wharram experimented, given the diversity of junk layouts,

    Interesting that with dozens of Wharram owners experimenting never got it right either.

    How many rigs can you afford to build to compare results?

    Dozens? More? Years you have to refine a 5000year old rig?

    Some folks just prefer to cruise , with out catching the "Bestitis" disease.

    FF
     
    1 person likes this.
  7. Ilan Voyager
    Joined: May 2004
    Posts: 1,292
    Likes: 225, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 758
    Location: Cancun Mexico

    Ilan Voyager Senior Member

    Thanks Tad for the very clear exposition about trimarans. Tris are very interesting boats but not well suited for cruising as Tad has explained so clearly. Tris must be kept light and are ecpensive to build. A catamaran would be more efficient and cheaper for a cruising boat.

    Junk sails have been invented for slow boats going downwind, and are not suitable on "fast" multihulls. And why to go in complications? Fully battened main sails are very well mannered, easy to tune and efficient, and very easy to reef. The technology involved is well known today. Free standing masts are almost impossible to design for multihulls because of the big righting moments of these boats.

    A long time ago, my associate and I designed -for a naval architect- a schooner rig for a cruising cat skipped by a lone guy. The rig was composed of 2 "short" identical rotating masts, fully battened mainsails with wishbones, not any jib, except a flying reacher for very light weather.

    So the mast were very light (with very wide spreaders to minimize the compression), the center of sail was adjusted "playing" with the 2 main sails.

    The owner aged of 67 years told us that the journey from Panama to Tahiti was the most boring of his life, as he had nothing to do except sleeping and reading while making 250 miles a day with his 45 feet catamaran, a part a few tacks...
     
    2 people like this.
  8. Tad
    Joined: Mar 2002
    Posts: 2,321
    Likes: 214, Points: 73, Legacy Rep: 2281
    Location: Flattop Islands

    Tad Boat Designer

    Almost.....but not quite impossible.

    See the Dick Newick designs Cheers (40' proa), White Wings (37' tri), and Pat's (51' tri)

    Also a number of cat's with un-stayed biplane rigs, including the Schionning designed Radical Bay...
    mickeyearsweb.jpg
     
  9. Ilan Voyager
    Joined: May 2004
    Posts: 1,292
    Likes: 225, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 758
    Location: Cancun Mexico

    Ilan Voyager Senior Member

    Yes I know these designs and some more as those by Philippe Harlé, Chris White, even Shutlleworth and others, plus in France a few shipyards had in catalogue multis with free standing masts and at my knowledge they were;

    A-Or not very efficient as the mast was too bendy.
    B-Or very, very expensive all carbon and so on.
    C-Many times very expensive and bendy.

    And I do not speak about weight, materials and reefing issues.

    It has been a fashion of these masts in 80-85, and every designer was purposing them. Within the following years, these designs disappeared and many of those which were built were refitted with "classic" masts. I know at least five, the first being Juniper by White.

    Unstayed masts work very well on monohulls and it's a rational solution.
    On tris it's possible, but if you want a rigging able to give the power that a modern tri is able to withstand the task becomes difficult.
    On a catamaran it's almost impossible because of mechanical problems, unless using a twin rig, which has its own little problems (and look closely at the pic of the catamaran...what do you think of the bending of the masts, and the shape of the sails in a very moderate wind?)

    Furthermore, I was answering to a question about junk sails, something thought as cheap and simple, for someone who has not a big wallet. Good unstayed masts are not cheap, and far from simple on multihulls, a part some small ones.

    A rotating aluminium extrusion with wide spreaders, 4 stays and a fully battened mainsail is a solution that has an excellent ratio simplicity/price/efficiency on a cruising boat. Engineering is easy and well documented, and the job can be done by an amateur. If you had a well designed fishbone, you save a lot of expensive hardware, and if you forget the jibs more money is saved.

    2 "short" masts, 2 mainsails, an optional reacher. No tracks, no chariots, no winches, no furlers, no expensive hardware except one all purpose winch. Simple, effective, cheap for a cruising boat boat without search of speed.

    Behind any picture we see, we should ask; was it successful? efficient? what was the cost? how long has taken the tuning? what happened in the following five years?
     
  10. boat fan
    Joined: Sep 2008
    Posts: 717
    Likes: 17, Points: 18, Legacy Rep: 435
    Location: Australia

    boat fan Senior Member

    Yes , the historic data seems to support your statement.

    This approach seems to show some promise , without being excessively
    expensive ;


    http://www.harryproa.com/Builders/BainRobertson/LaunchDec2006/Large/P1010055.jpg

    http://www.harryproa.com/Builders/BainRobertson/LaunchDec2006/Large/P1010054.jpg

    http://www.harryproa.com/Builders/BainRobertson/LaunchDec2006/Large/026.jpg

    Seems to be home buildable , with some care and effort.
     
    Last edited: Dec 31, 2008
  11. boat fan
    Joined: Sep 2008
    Posts: 717
    Likes: 17, Points: 18, Legacy Rep: 435
    Location: Australia

    boat fan Senior Member

    Interesting Gunter rig from B.Kohler at K Designs :

    f060.jpg


    Sliding Gunter Schooner ?
    Low cost , low tech.
     
    Last edited: Dec 31, 2008
  12. Ilan Voyager
    Joined: May 2004
    Posts: 1,292
    Likes: 225, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 758
    Location: Cancun Mexico

    Ilan Voyager Senior Member

    Very interesting...

    The balestron has been tried several times. I have tried it on a 18 feet sport monodromic proa in comparison trials with a wing mast. On this particular case the wing mast was more efficient and lighter.

    I has been also a big fan of RC class M boats (1.27m monohulls with radio command) where the balestron is the best solution. The purpose is to get a high Cz by ventilation of the mainsail extrados.

    After squeezing my old brain, I remember of one made around 1920 by a German guy with fully battened main sail. I have read that in a -I'm not sure- sailing aerodynamics book.

    I know very well the balestron made for Elf Aquitaine II. This balestron has been designed by top cream guys, after a costly wind tunnel campaign and built regardless of cost with the best of the better materials. I remember that the price of the custom conical rollers bearings was superior to the price of a new good car...Brief, it was beautiful, high tech, very expensive and a total, absolute failure.

    In the French Flying Circus of racing multihulls (and everybody agrees that the French have the fastest multihulls of the world), the word balestron gives eczema to the designers, engineers, skippers and sailors. After 30 years of intense racing, where hundreds of millions dollars have been invested in the search of the ultimate sailing multihull, I think that the best solutions have been found and balestron is not among them.

    About the catamaran pics. I'm a hard believer in Occam's razor principle (in plain english MISS principle, Make It Simple and Stupid), and I do not see any advantage on the use of a gaff compared to a classic mast. I won't make any calculation but I have a doubt about the 80/75 mm aluminium tube, heavy for a 6.5m cat (It weights 3.3 to 3.5 kg/meter). The spruce/carbon gaff has to be made (money and work) with tracks, haulyards and so on. Plus a very custom sail, not easy to cut for the sail maker. What's the advantage compared to a "classic" rotating mast and a wishbone?

    03/Jan/09 The german guy was Manfred Curry -a spicy name- in the 30's.
    About balestron: the aerorig (the original internet site has disappeared) but an interesting link.

    http://www.john-shuttleworth.com/Articles/52AeroDesign.html

    With pros and cons -to read between the lines- results heavy and very high tech. The rig cost surely 3 times the price of a "ordinary" rig. Very complicated to install on a catamaran. Gives a lot of aero infos.

    Another link of a aerorig on a monohull

    http://yachtlanovia.com/aerorig-uns...rthanded-performance-ocean-sailing-yacht.html

    Very good results.

    I stay convinced that a schooner rigging (when the boat is long enough) of 2 identical masts (13 meters high on the 14m catamaran) with fully battened mainsails and wishbone, and a flying reacher is a good solution on a cruising cat, kept light. The mast are light (little compression), the height center of sail is low, the longitudinal center of sail easily adjustable and hardware kept to the minimum. Ok aerodynamics are not the best, but efficiency is largely enough for a cruising cat. The cost is rather low.

    For the very heavy cats, the lone solution is diesel and big tanks of fuel, and/or a lot of patience.
     
    Last edited: Jan 3, 2009
  13. BigCat
    Joined: Jan 2008
    Posts: 73
    Likes: 1, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 27
    Location: near Seattle

    BigCat Junior Member

    Some opinions are junk, too.

    If you've been there, done that, and thought it was junk, you didn't know what you were doing. I've been there, done that, and love it. See Batwing in Hasler's Practical Junk Rig - My boat, that I sailed across the Pacific.:eek:
     
  14. BigCat
    Joined: Jan 2008
    Posts: 73
    Likes: 1, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 27
    Location: near Seattle

    BigCat Junior Member

    An other uninformed opinion, worth every nickel it cost you. Junk rigs are weatherly, now, due to the advent of the cambered junk rig. Read about it at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/junkrig/
     

  15. BigCat
    Joined: Jan 2008
    Posts: 73
    Likes: 1, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 27
    Location: near Seattle

    BigCat Junior Member

    A third uninformed opinion worth every nickel it cost. I designed a catamaran with 600,000 foot pounds of righting moment, and the USCG naval architects approved my unstayed biplane rig design. The rig cost is a lot less than a conventional rig. About 1/3, maybe less. See http://bigcatcatamarans.com .
     
Loading...
Forum posts represent the experience, opinion, and view of individual users. Boat Design Net does not necessarily endorse nor share the view of each individual post.
When making potentially dangerous or financial decisions, always employ and consult appropriate professionals. Your circumstances or experience may be different.