To install this app on your iPhone:
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not really. I think it is a matter of preference, available equipment, and personal skills. Several solutions will work.
Hi, I am building a small sailing dinghy with a lug rig. As you probably know, lug rig has massive forces on the halyard and downhaul, which, if attached to the mast partner, will pull it up while trying to pierce the mast through the bottom of the boat.
Any suggestions?
t occurred to me yesterday,while I was reminiscing about something entirely different,that there may be a simple alternative if the mast tube is not capped at both ends yet.I was thinking about a man i used to know who fulfilled the orders for the wooden caps that were fitted to Mirror dinghies when metal masts became an option.He turned them from iroko and they had a slot for a sheave and a lower end that was spigotted to fit inside the tubular section.Which made me think that maybe this mast might be created from a length of uncapped tube and not a home made alternative.This would give access from either end for a simpler solution.If this is the case then I would suggest a Tufnol insert which could be tapped to suit the fasteners used by the cleat and curved to suit tubular section.The technique would be to drill the mast at the required centres and through each of the holes,drop a thin line,take the two lines to the end of the mast,tread them through the holes in the insert and tie them together.Smear epoxy on the bonding surface and carefully tighten the lines to pull the insert into place.Once located tie the external parts of the lines together and roll the mast-when horizontal- until the insert is at the lowest position and hang some weigh on the lines until a cure has taken place.
The technique has worked for me in the past when adding reinforcing pads beneath the double bottom of a Moth.In the instance of a mast tube it might mean creating a curved sanding pad on the end of a batten to prepare the internal surface for bonding.There may be arguments for creating the tapped holes before sliding the insert into place or using an undersized hole and tapping the thread when bonded.These are matters to be decided by the man doing the job.
Yes,it does slightly compromise the mas tube,but there is some compensation in that the Tufnol insert bridges the holes you have created and I wouldn't think a couple of small holes,say M5 maximum would be that great a difference.For your proposed printed core,it wouldn't be too difficult to print a recess to receive the insert,the difficulty might be locating it after the carbon is in place.
Do whatever you're comfortable with laukejas. Everything is a learning experience for the home DIY person.
I would think the simplest way to dilute the stress raiser effect of a hole ,or holes,would be to apply an additional layer of the same carbon with the fibres orientated at +/- 45 degrees to the axis of the spar and extending perhaps 20mm beyond the footprint of the cleat base.
I'm not sure I would enjoy the prospect of laminating the spar,but we all have different levels of tolerance for various processes and mine isn't particularly high where big laminating projects are concerned.
If you are set on using fasteners, the easiest way is to through bolt opposing cleats with a compression tube in between.
If I understand this right, you're talking about the backing plate here? Add a recess in the mast core, add the plate, wrap carbon on top, and add a few additional layers of carbon with that 20mm extension over the area where the plate is? And that would probably offset the loss in strength when I drill the holes through? If so, then it is definitely an easier solution than gluing the cleat onto the surface of the mast without any screws.
I don't think it will make much difference if the additional ply is inside the mast,half way through the laminate stack or on the outside of the spar.The point is to distribute the loads into the laminate.