Dragon boat hull speed: "W" hull vs. flat hull

Discussion in 'Boat Design' started by JosephT, Sep 8, 2010.

  1. tom28571
    Joined: Dec 2001
    Posts: 2,474
    Likes: 117, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 1728
    Location: Oriental, NC

    tom28571 Senior Member

    I agree with you Douglas,

    Now my only thought is that, if it is ok to build a flat bottom (or mostly flat), then that is what I will do if I am asked to build one. Just watching the performance of various teams in sprint races, I would say that crew training is tops, steering and drummer come next. The boats are all so close that I don't see any advantage between them.

    Don't want to argue the air entrainment issue but if it was an advantage would not racing sculls use it? They are faster than the dragon boats (at least the ones I saw) and it would be more of an advantage to them.
     
  2. Douglas Ingram
    Joined: Sep 2010
    Posts: 7
    Likes: 0, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 10
    Location: Lorette, Manitoba, Canada

    Douglas Ingram Junior Member

    It would be fascinating to try building one!

    BTW, if you ever do get involved in building a DB, its not hard to build the hull with a flat bottom and add the W bottom points afterwards. That's how I did mine.

    After re-reading my previous post I am ashamed at all of the typos! That's what you get for writing just before going to bed...
     
  3. troy2000
    Joined: Nov 2009
    Posts: 1,738
    Likes: 170, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 2078
    Location: California

    troy2000 Senior Member

    Putting in my two bits strictly as an amateur when it comes to boats, I'd say that if a particular shape is traditional in building something (whether it be a boat or a barn), it's important to figure out why before changing it. There may have been very practical reasons for doing it the way it was done -- whether it be for strength, ease of construction with the original materials, or practical function.

    Of course, sometimes there isn't a good reason. It may just be that fashion evolved into habit, for better or worse.....

    But getting back to the dragon boats: aside from the ideas already mentioned (about the exaggerated chines helping the boat track; the 'W' shape stiffening the boat and allowing fewer frames; etc), I have one more thought.

    Is it possible that the 'W'-shaped hull transfers some of the buoyancy from the center of the hull to the sides, and helps the boat stay level when 20+ paddlers start rocking and rolling? It seems to me that with short paddles and a short stroke, anything that kept the boat from rolling even a couple of inches might make a difference.

    Or would the difference between the 'W' and a flat hull be negligible?
     
  4. PAR
    Joined: Nov 2003
    Posts: 19,126
    Likes: 498, Points: 93, Legacy Rep: 3967
    Location: Eustis, FL

    PAR Yacht Designer/Builder

    I'm not sure what the PPI for each "sponson" would be, but it wouldn't be as much as the flat bottom hull Troy, so I would assume the flat bottom has a higher initial stability.

    I guess the real question is how much real measuring is done to see if a new build conforms the the standard. If they come out with a tape measure and check; length, beam, freeboard, LWL, etc. then you could optimize the rocker and volume distribution for best preformance. Naturally, if they drag out some templates, you're screwed.
     
  5. Douglas Ingram
    Joined: Sep 2010
    Posts: 7
    Likes: 0, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 10
    Location: Lorette, Manitoba, Canada

    Douglas Ingram Junior Member

    The W bottom on the Dragonboat doesn't add width as a sponson would, its more like dropping the chines along each side down below the bottom panel.

    You can see it here on the drawings that I used to build my DB.

    For a flat bottom DB, just imagine that the bottom panel is extended out sideways to meet the chine panel.
     

    Attached Files:

  6. tspeer
    Joined: Feb 2002
    Posts: 2,319
    Likes: 303, Points: 83, Legacy Rep: 1673
    Location: Port Gamble, Washington, USA

    tspeer Senior Member

    You guys are all assuming the W has a hydrodynamic function. What if it simply makes it easier to pull the boat out of the water & up the beach across rollers?
     
  7. troy2000
    Joined: Nov 2009
    Posts: 1,738
    Likes: 170, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 2078
    Location: California

    troy2000 Senior Member

    Easier than pulling a flat bottom across rollers? I don't think so....:)
     
  8. daiquiri
    Joined: May 2004
    Posts: 5,371
    Likes: 258, Points: 93, Legacy Rep: 3380
    Location: Italy (Garda Lake) and Croatia (Istria)

    daiquiri Engineering and Design

    Found it! The Wikipedia page about dragonboats explains the reason for that odd hullform. Basically, it derives from building method of traditional dragonboats, which were made from three logs - the central one placed slightly above the lateral ones. The lateral logs were acting like sponsons, because the particular paddling technique (http://dragonboats.tripod.com/pages/db_paddling_technique.htm) required an increased stability. So the modern hullform is merely the imitation of the ancient one, adapted to modern building techniques.

    Citation (from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dragon_boat):
    "Canoes are derived from hollowed out tree trunks (either single log, or single log supported by one or a pair of outrigged float pontoons or else catamaran style double logs.); or from birch and other deciduous tree bark shells stretched over wooden frames. Traditional wooden dragon boats, however, derive from rafts of three lashed-together logs which have been hollowed out and are like the long and slender bamboo rafts consisting of lashed bundles of hollow bamboo stalks which can still be seen in China today. The center log acts as the keel with another log attached on each side of it acting like a pair of sponsons for stability, preventing the center log from otherwise rolling. It is the three lashed, rafted logs of old that give the Hong Kong style of dragon boats its characteristic hull form cross section underwater seen today, which is like the shape of the letter "W". Whereas a canoe or outrigger paddler sits INSIDE of the hull formed from a hollowed log that is wide enough to sit IN, dragon boat paddlers sit ON TOP OF the hull formed, traditionally, of the three log raft. The keel (the longitudinal centerline plank) is constructed above the level of the two, downward sloping garboard planks attached on each side of the keel, so there is a kind of tunnel hull shape running down the centerline. This unique design feature is a vestigal throwback to earlier primitive lashed-log raft forms on which modern hulls are based. Traditional wooden boats are slender and heavy, typically weighing in at approximately 1,750 pounds for a 22-person hull. As the sport of dragon boating has increased in popularity and spread to countries outside of Asia, many countries have switched to using dragon boats constructed of fibreglass and plastic resin, which are significantly lighter."

    Cheers!
     
  9. Village_Idiot
    Joined: Oct 2007
    Posts: 382
    Likes: 18, Points: 18, Legacy Rep: 138
    Location: USA

    Village_Idiot Senior Member

    I'm on the side that flat bottom should be faster and more efficient. If offers the most load-carrying capacity with the shallowest draft and least amount of wetted area (friction). As mentioned, keels will help to keep the hull on course.

    If there truly is a positive effect by trapping water/air under the hull, perhaps a better design would be a flat bottom with ice runners (narrow vertical ridges) on the chines. The runners would serve to hold water under the boat without drastically increasing wetted area, and would serve to keep the hull on course.
     
  10. daiquiri
    Joined: May 2004
    Posts: 5,371
    Likes: 258, Points: 93, Legacy Rep: 3380
    Location: Italy (Garda Lake) and Croatia (Istria)

    daiquiri Engineering and Design

    Come on folks, I think it is so overwhelmingly clear and logical that air entrapment has nothing to do with this hullform that it shouldn't be used as an argument. Unless you want to waste some time on empty talks...
    There can be no air below the hull with this hullform and at paddling speeds, hence there can be no friction reduction or else. We can talk about stability if you want, about course keeping, about tradition, about construction methods or about anything else. But let's stop talking about this air entrapment stuff, it is a total nonsense.
    Cheers!
     
  11. JosephT
    Joined: Jun 2009
    Posts: 859
    Likes: 107, Points: 43, Legacy Rep: 218
    Location: Roaring Forties

    JosephT Senior Member

    Thanks for all the responses. As an aerospace geek focused more on aerodynamics vs. hydrodynamics the same principle applies with drag. The more surface area the more drag. It's good to debunk the notion that a W hull somehow provides lift. With a boat + crew (4,000+ lbs) I doubt much if any lift would be generated unless you're in the eye of a hurricane.

    One of my dragon boat captains acknowledged that steering a W hull is easier, so that reinforces their design intent.

    During our marathon we finished in record time with a flat bottom hull and 3 highly skilled steers, so keeping on track wasn't ever an issue. The steering oar alone did the job just fine.

    Thanks again for all the great feedback. :)
     

  12. keith66
    Joined: Sep 2007
    Posts: 346
    Likes: 31, Points: 28, Legacy Rep: 168
    Location: Essex UK

    keith66 Senior Member

    On the 25th September is the Great River race from Greenwhich London to Richmond, though primarily a race for traditional fixed seat rowing boats a good number of dragon boats take part. At 22 miles its a distance race that can be very rough but those dragon boat crews really go for it. At the end of the day the strongest fittest crew that does not sink wins!
     
Loading...
Forum posts represent the experience, opinion, and view of individual users. Boat Design Net does not necessarily endorse nor share the view of each individual post.
When making potentially dangerous or financial decisions, always employ and consult appropriate professionals. Your circumstances or experience may be different.