need help -- inclining experiment calculation

Discussion in 'Boat Design' started by jerryah, Nov 27, 2005.

  1. jerryah
    Joined: Nov 2005
    Posts: 4
    Likes: 0, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 10
    Location: CHINA

    jerryah New Member

    Problems of inclining experiment calculation

    Dear all,

    Few questions regarding the inclining test calculation puzzles me for a long time. I need your expert direction now.
    I try to work out test report of a 180m (Lbp) cargo carrier, the vessel have a 0.2m hogging and 1.35m trim (by strern) during test period. The draughts at midship & fore/aft perpendiculars are Df, Dm & Da. The sea water specific gravity is just equal to 1.025:) (I need not consider the correction of different specific gravity, so luck), below are steps of part of my calculation.
    1). do a hogging correction by (Df+6*Dm+Da)/8=Dmn
    2). use even keel hydrostatic data sheet to find out the displacement (Disp1), TPC, MTC, KMT and LCF coresponding to Dmn.
    3). do a displacement correction due to trim by (LCF/Lbp)*Trim*TPC*100
    4). got the actual displacement under inclined condition

    Ok, my question is
    1) is that correct to use (Df+6*Dm+Da)/8 to get Dmn, because I've ever saw another formula (Df+4*Dm+Da)/6, which one is correct or both correct?
    2) is that correct to get TPC, MTC, KMT and LCF corresponding to Dmn? The Dmn is draught at LCF or at Lbp/2? If it is draught at Lbp/2, need I corrected it to draught at LCF coresponding to actual trim?
    3) is that correct to use even keel hydrostatic data to get these parameters mentioned in question 2) or I should use trimed hydrostatic data by interpolate method to get those parameters?

    Thanks for any reply!!!
     
    Last edited: Nov 30, 2005
  2. jerryah
    Joined: Nov 2005
    Posts: 4
    Likes: 0, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 10
    Location: CHINA

    jerryah New Member

    surprise! nobody knows?
     
  3. JLL
    Joined: Oct 2005
    Posts: 11
    Likes: 0, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 10
    Location: SPAIN

    JLL Junior Member

    Hi,
    In my experience, I never use the Dmn. In the input data of my Hydrostatics software that I used to work , I introduce Df&Da , and the software runs with trimmed hydrostatics to calculate CoG
    You could run with even keel hdrostatics at Dmn and compare with the trimmed hydrostatics. Differences is expected to occurs.
     
  4. jerryah
    Joined: Nov 2005
    Posts: 4
    Likes: 0, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 10
    Location: CHINA

    jerryah New Member

    Hi, JLL, thanks for your reply. But I'm really doubt that how your software consider the hogging correction. You know, for small vessel L<50m, normally they don't have obviously hogging. but for big vessel L>150m, 0.1~0.3m hogging is very normal.
     
  5. JLL
    Joined: Oct 2005
    Posts: 11
    Likes: 0, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 10
    Location: SPAIN

    JLL Junior Member

    "have a 0.2m hogging " means initial list? If so, IMO procedure for inclining test accept a initial list not exceeding 0,5º. Due that we correct list by list weights in order not exceed above value, we introduce the mean value of port and starboard deflection. Our range boats are up to 30m length.
     
  6. Guillermo
    Joined: Mar 2005
    Posts: 3,644
    Likes: 189, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 2247
    Location: Pontevedra, Spain

    Guillermo Ingeniero Naval

    JLL:
    Hog means : "Quebranto" and Sag: "Arrufo", in Spanish.


    JERRYAH:
    As a 1.35 m trim is less than 0.01*180, you may use the level hydrostatics.

    I do not know about your Dmn calculation for hogging, either with 6 or 8 times the Dm.

    I know about this correction:
    "In cases the level trim hydrostatic data is used, a correction shall be made to Disp derived from the mean of Df and Da, as follows:
    Cd = 0.75*(Dhs*TPC)
    being Cd the correction to be found, and Dhs the measured hog (-) or sag (+) in centimetres." (TPC you already know)
    I think this correction is all you need for your case.

    I hope this may be of help.
     
  7. JLL
    Joined: Oct 2005
    Posts: 11
    Likes: 0, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 10
    Location: SPAIN

    JLL Junior Member

    Guillermo: Thank you. I didn´t know the term. ¿Where are you?
     
  8. jerryah
    Joined: Nov 2005
    Posts: 4
    Likes: 0, Points: 0, Legacy Rep: 10
    Location: CHINA

    jerryah New Member

    Hello, Guillermo,

    it's pretty good to see your reply. I think you are very good at such calculation. regarding the "hogging correction", actually Cd = 0.75*(Dhs*TPC) is the exactly same correction way as "(1+6+1)/8.

    I check a lot of class rules and IMO regulations. they all said if the trim is less than 1%Lbp, even keel hydrostatic values are acceptable for calculation. I want to get more accurate result. They suggest me to use ship model and loading software, but I don't understand, need I find out all hydrostatic data (LCB, MCT, KMT, TPC, LCF) base on the actual inclining condition?
     
  9. Guillermo
    Joined: Mar 2005
    Posts: 3,644
    Likes: 189, Points: 63, Legacy Rep: 2247
    Location: Pontevedra, Spain

    Guillermo Ingeniero Naval

    JERRYAH
    Yes, if you want to be more accurate, you should obtain the hydrostatic data at the inclining experiment condition, using the trimmed waterplane. But really, using the level trim data is good enough for your case's trim.
     

  10. Syam Krishnan
    Joined: Feb 2018
    Posts: 3
    Likes: 0, Points: 1
    Location: Cochin

    Syam Krishnan New Member

    Please use XShip Inclining App available on the below link to make calculations easy. It will calculate all the parameters for you and give results and GM values and it's totally FREE...!!
    http://inclining.xship.in/

    XShip products - visit www.xship.in
     
Loading...
Forum posts represent the experience, opinion, and view of individual users. Boat Design Net does not necessarily endorse nor share the view of each individual post.
When making potentially dangerous or financial decisions, always employ and consult appropriate professionals. Your circumstances or experience may be different.